Masters of Deception by Zander C. Fuerza

MASTERS OF DECEPTION COVER 1

In this book, “Masters of Deception: Zionism, 9/11 and the War on Terror Hoax,” writer Zander C. Fuerza documents a Zionist conspiracy behind the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the United States. Collecting the most potent pieces of evidence available, the author forms a cohesive narrative demonstrating that the Israeli Mossad, with the assistance of Zionist assets in the American government, conspired to execute the 9/11 attacks as a false-flag event designed to initiate the devilish neocon dream of a “Clash of Civilizations” between the Western world and the Islamic world, for the benefit of Israel and Zionism.

The complete book can be downloaded HERE or HERE

Copyright © 2013 Zander C. Fuerza. All rights reserved.

Posted in Masters of Deception Book | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 39 Comments

Masters of Deception: Chapter Seventeen

MASTERS OF DECEPTION COVER 1CHAPTER SEVENTEEN

Jewish Occupation: Zionism Rules America

Since its founding in 1948, the Zionist entity known as ‘Israel’ has operated as a rogue terrorist state, truly a global pariah having violated over 65 United Nations resolutions from 1955 to 1992. (“UN Resolutions Targeting Israel and the Palestinians,” If Americans Knew Website) Founded upon terrorist atrocities and ethnic cleansing, Israel has consistently waged wars of aggression and conquest against its neighbors, such as the Six Day War (1967), the Yom Kippur War (1973), the invasion and occupation of Lebanon in 1978, 1982 and 2006, and so on. The terrorist state of Israel threatens the entire world with its large nuclear weapons arsenal that is, unlike most other states, not subject to any international inspections or regulations. Despite Israel’s murderous policies against innocent and defenseless people, American politicians are forced to express approval of its atrocious behavior and acquiesce to every Israeli demand, genuflecting at the altar of this entity like servile slaves.

STATUE-OF-ZIONISMThe reason for this should be obvious: Jews completely control the United States. Using their media, economic and political clout, Jews force the American government to support and defend Israel no matter what the cost is to America. In the words of the former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon: “We, the Jewish people, control America!” It is a fact that the U.S. panders to Israel — a state which offers no geostrategic or economic benefits to America — and this essentially validates Sharon’s boastful statement. Pat Buchanan, a well-known author, political commentator, influential staff member in the Nixon and Reagan administrations and former presidential candidate, once said that, “Capitol Hill is Israeli occupied territory.” Former U.S. Congressman Paul Findley documented the reality of Buchanan’s words in a book called, “They Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel’s Lobby”. On page 161 of Findley’s book, he quotes the former Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Thomas Moorer, who said:

“I’ve never seen a President — I don’t care who he is — stand up to them [the Israelis]. It just boggles the mind. They always get what they want. The Israelis know what is going on all the time. I got to the point where I wasn’t writing any­thing down. If the American people understood what a grip those people have got on our government, they would rise up in arms. Our citizens certainly don’t have any idea what goes on.”

In an interview with Vanity Fair magazine, British MP Tom Dalyell echoed these sentiments, stating that “a Jewish cabal have taken over the government in the United States and formed an unholy alliance with fundamentalist Christians.” (“Anger over Dalyell’s ‘Jewish cabal’ slur,” The Scotsman, May 5, 2003.) Israeli columnist Ari Shavit, in an essay reprinted in the May 27, 1996, issue of the New York Times, reflected on the Israeli massacre of hundreds of Lebanese civilians the month before, stating: “[w]e killed them out of a certain naive hubris. Believing with absolute certitude that now, with the White House, the Senate, and much of the American media in our hands, the lives of others do not count as much as our own.” (Joe Sobran, “‘In Our Hands’,” The Wanderer, June 13, 1996.)

The poisonous effects of this control have been felt by numerous U.S. politicians who refused to bow to Zionist demands when it comes to the Middle East. Cynthia McKinney, a former U.S. Congresswoman from the state of Georgia, was railroaded out of office by the Zionist lobby due to her sympathies for the oppressed Palestinians. In 1992, when McKinney’s political career was taking off, she received a fax from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) which she says turned out to be “a pledge stating that as a candidate I would commit my tenure, should I win, to the military superiority of Israel, to Jerusalem as the capital city, to continued aid at the level requested by Israel.” (Dr. Hanan Chehata, “Cynthia McKinney, Former US Presidential candidate, blames the pro-Israel Lobby for ruining her political career,” Memo Middle East Monitor, Dec. 08, 2011.) Standing by her principles, McKinney refused to sign this treasonous ‘pledge’ which is essentially required of every candidate running for Congress if they wish to receive any significant amount of campaign contributions. Because of this, McKinney says, “war was declared” on her by the Jewish lobby, who eventually ousted her from Congress by funding and supporting her political opponents. (Ibid.) In 2009, McKinney told an interviewer that “more than 99% of Congress work for Pro-Zionist Israeli interests.” (TiU Radio, April 30, 2009.) Other American politicians driven from office for taking stances that Israel and its supporters in America didn’t like include Paul Findley, Pete McCloskey, Charles H. Percy, Roger Jepson, Earl Hilliard, Lincoln Chafee and William Fulbright. (Juan Cole, “Only a “For America” PAC Can Stop the Madness,” Jan 12, 2009.)

The righteous former U.S. Congressman James Traficant was also targeted by the Jewish lobby for his patriotic stances and policies. Because of his strong opposition to the war in Iraq and criticism of unilateral American support for Israel, in addition to his efforts to help out an innocent man named John Demjanjuk who was being wrongly pursued as a ‘Nazi war criminal,’ Jewish zealots saw to it that Trafficant was taken out of the picture. (See: Collins, Michael Piper. Target Traficant. American Free Press, 2005.) The Jewish lobby engineered Trafficant’s demise, having him thrown in jail for seven years on trumped-up corruption charges. (Ibid.) After being released from prison in 2009, Traficant hit back in a televised interview with Greta van Susteren of Fox News, in which he forcefully articulated the view that:

“… Israel has a powerful stranglehold on the American government. They [Zionist Jews] control both members of the House, and the Senate. They have us involved in wars in which we have little or no interest. Our children are coming back in body bags. Our nation is bankrupt over these wars. And if you open your mouth, you get targeted. And if they don’t beat you at the poll, they’ll put you in prison. [...] They’re controlling much of our foreign policy. They’re influencing much of our domestic policy. Wolfowitz as undersecretary of defense manipulated President Bush number two back into Iraq. They’ve pushed definitely, definitely to try to get Bush before he left to move into Iran. We’re conducting the expansionist policy of Israel and everybody’s afraid to say it. They control much of the media, they control much of the commerce of the country, and they control powerfully both bodies of the Congress. They own the Congress.” (“James Traficant on the Jewish lobby’s power in the U.S.,” Radio Islam / “Greta Van Susteren – James Traficant,” YouTube)

It is because of this overwhelming Jewish influence that the U.S. government officially gives Israel $3 billion per year in foreign aid and military assistance. James Traficant pointed out that this is a deliberately understated figure, alleging that Israel gets closer to $15 billion per year of American taxpayers’ money. He told Greta Van Susteren:

“I did a live interview satellite with Bryant Gumbel, and I said, “When they put this innocent man [John Demjanjuk] to death, they’re going to lose $15 billion to $20 billion every year they get from the American taxpayers. And Bryant Gumbel says, “What are you talking about? They only get $3 billion.” And I said, “Bryant, that’s only the foreign aid bill. Look at all of the other trade compacts, economic assistance, military assistance.” I am saying this to you right now — Israel gets approximately $15 billion a year from the American taxpayers. That $15 billion is $30,000 for every man, woman and child. And people in my district are losing their pension benefits.” (Ibid.)

Conservative estimates put the total amount of aid that the United States has given to Israel since its founding at over 120 billion dollars. (Shirl McArthur, “A Conservative Estimate of Total U.S. Aid To Israel: More Than $123 Billion,” Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, Nov. 2011.) Taking Traficant’s revelations about U.S. aid to Israel into account, the real amount of U.S. taxpayer dollars that have gone to Israel since it was founded could actually be two or three times as high. This still goes on even at a time when millions of Americans cannot find work and are losing their homes due to foreclosure. As the U.S. economy spirals downward into collapse, Israel still gets its fat paycheck every year, signed by the U.S. government. As millions of American citizens starve on the streets while the government does nothing to help them, Israel receives millions each week to fund its war machine.

In 2010, Helen Thomas, a White House correspondent and fifty year veteran of the White House press corps, was pressured to resign from her position after she was recorded on video making statements against Israel. (“US reporter Helen Thomas quits over Israel comments,” BBC News, June 7 2010.) A rabbi approached her on the street with a video camera and asked her to comment on Israel, to which she remarked: “Tell them [the Jews] to get the hell out of Palestine! Remember, these people [the Palestinians] are occupied, and it’s their land.” (Ibid.) Shortly after the video surfaced, Organized Jewry unleashed a frenzied witch-hunt to demonize Helen Thomas and drive her from her profession, even calling on journalism schools and groups to revoke any honors given to her in previous years. Thomas told an interviewer that the Anti-Defamation League was trying to intimidate her, stating: “I’m going to tell the Anti-Defamation League to back off. They think they have the right of intimidation. They already got my job. They want to get my honorary degrees.” (“Helen Thomas says Anti-Defamation League is intimidating her,” Wake Up From Your Slumber, Dec. 09, 2010.) Reflecting on the debacle, Thomas told another interviewer, “You can’t criticize Israel in this country and survive.” (“Helen Thomas on being anti-Semitic: ‘Baloney!’,” Associated Press, Oct. 12, 2010.) In a public speech Thomas hit back against the Jewish attacks, revealing the true nature of Zionist power over America, stating:

“We are owned by propagandists against the Arabs. There’s no question about that. Congress, the White House, and Hollywood, Wall Street, are owned by the Zionists. No question in my opinion. They put their money where their mouth is…We’re being pushed into a wrong direction in every way.” (“Wayne State ends Helen Thomas Award,” United Press International, Dec. 4, 2010.)

In a 2011 interview with Playboy Magazine, Thomas elaborated:

“[The Jews are] using their power, and they have power in every direction. Power over the White House, power over Congress … Everybody is in the pocket of the Israeli lobbies, which are funded by wealthy supporters, including those from Hollywood. Same thing with the financial markets. There’s total control … It isn’t the 2 percent. It’s real power when you own the White House, when you own these other places in terms of your political persuasion. Of course they have power. [To the interviewer] You don’t deny that. You’re Jewish, aren’t you?” (“Helen Thomas to Playboy: Jews ‘own the White House’,” Politico, Mar. 18, 2011.)

TENTACLES-OF-ZIONUniversity of Chicago Professor, John Mersheimer, and Harvard academic Stephen Walt, co-authored the text “The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy” exposing the death-grip Israel has over American politics through pro-Israeli pressure groups like the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). The Jewish lobby, in conjunction with the Jewish-owned press, launched a vicious smear campaign against these two erudite scholars, labeling them ‘anti-Semitic’ simply for exposing truths about Jewish power in America. In an interview with Amy Goodman of Democracy Now, the former Israeli minister Shulamit Aloni admitted that the defamation tactic of labeling all critics of Israel, Zionism and Judaism ‘anti-Semitic’ is “a trick, we always use it!” (“‘It’s a Trick, We Always Use It.’ (calling people “anti-Semitic”),” YouTube) The vast network of Jewish-Zionist lobby groups in the U.S. represents a giant octopus whose poisonous tentacles have stretched over the entire nation. The combined power of these criminal organizations over American political life, in congruence with Jewish media and financial control, is the death-knell of America. The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations (CoP) describes itself as “a central address for key American, Israeli and other world leaders to consult on issues of critical concern to the Jewish community.” The official CoP website lists fifty-one of its members, America’s most powerful Jewish lobby groups who collaborate and work in tandem with one another to subvert the U.S. government to favor Israeli interests, operating as emissaries of the criminal Zionist regime occupying Palestine. These groups include:

- Ameinu
- American Friends of Likud
-American Gathering/Federation of Jewish Holocaust Survivors
– America-Israel Friendship League
– American Israel Public Affairs Committee
– American Jewish Committee
– American Jewish Congress
– American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee
– American Sephardi Federation
– American Zionist Movement
– Americans for Peace Now
– AMIT
– Anti-Defamation League
-Association of Reform Zionists of America
-B’nai B’rith International
– Bnai Zion
– Central Conference of American Rabbis
– Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America
– Development Corporation for Israel / State of Israel Bonds
– Emunah of America
– Friends of Israel Defense Forces
– Hadassah, Women’s Zionist Organization of America
– Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society
– Hillel: The Foundation for Jewish Campus Life
– Jewish Community Centers Association
– Jewish Council for Public Affairs
– The Jewish Federations of North America
– Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs
– Jewish Labor Committee
– Jewish National Fund
– Jewish Reconstructionist Federation
– Jewish Women International
– MERCAZ USA
– Zionist Organization of the Conservative Movement
– NA’AMAT USA
– NCSJ: Advocates on behalf of Jews in Russia, Ukraine, the Baltic States & Eurasia
– National Council of Jewish Women
– National Council of Young Israel
– ORT America
– Rabbinical Assembly
– Rabbinical Council of America
– Religious Zionists of America
– Union for Reform Judaism
– Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America
– United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism
– WIZO
– Women’s League for Conservative Judaism
– Women of Reform Judaism
– Workmen’s Circle
– World ORT
– World Zionist Executive, US
– Zionist Organization of America

The combined might of this prodigious Jewish crime network is truly breathtaking. According to James Petras’ informative book, The Power of Israel in the United States, AIPAC alone has 60,000 wealthy members with an annual budget of $60,000,000. The foundation of Jewish power is money, which affords them unchallenged political influence. Petras pointed out the extreme concentration of wealth in Jewish hands, stating that, “The basis of the (Jewish) Lobby’s PAC power is rooted in the high proportion of Jewish families among the wealthiest families in the United States. According to Forbes, 25 to 30 percent of U.S. multimillionaires and billionaires are Jewish.” Stephen Steinlight, former Director of National Affairs of the American Jewish Committee, conceded the “disproportionate political power” of Jews which he gloated is “pound for pound the greatest of any ethnic/cultural group in America.” He went on to explain that “Jewish economic influence and power are disproportionately concentrated in Hollywood, television, and in the news industry.” (S. Steinlight, “The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography: Reconsidering a Misguided Immigration Policy,” Center for Immigration Studies, Nov. 2001.)

The Jewish author J.J. Goldberg, in his book “Jewish Power: Inside the American Jewish Establishment” (pp. 38-39), revealed that there are approximately 300 national Jewish organizations in the United States with a combined budget estimated in the range of $6 billion — a sum greater than the gross national product of half the members of the United Nations! And that doesn’t even take into account the influence of wealthy Jewish families or individuals, and Jewish-controlled Wall Street banking houses like Goldman Sachs who hand out millions of dollars in campaign contributions to both the Democratic and Republican parties every election year. (See: Collins, Michael Piper. The New Babylon: Those Who Reign Supreme. American Free Press, 2009.) The Jewish author Henry L. Feingold, writing on page 4 of his book “Jewish Power in America: Myth and Reality,” noted that, “Over 60 percent of campaign funds collected by the Democratic party and a respectable percentage of Republican campaign funds stem from Jewish sources.” The Jewish-American scholar Alfred M. Lilienthal, in his 1978 work “The Zionist Connection,” acknowledged the towering dominance of Jews in American society, writing:

“How has the Zionist will been imposed on the American people?… It is the Jewish connection, the tribal solidarity among themselves and the amazing pull on non-Jews, that has molded this unprecedented power … The Jewish connection covers all areas and reaches every level. Most Americans may not even sense this gigantic effort, but there is scarcely a Jew who is not touched by its tentacles… The extent and depth to which organized Jewry reached – and reaches – in the U.S. is indeed awesome … The most effective component of the Jewish connection is probably that of media control … Jews, toughened by centuries of persecution, have risen to places of prime importance in the business and financial world… Jewish wealth and acumen wields unprecedented power in the area of finance and investment banking, playing an important role in influencing U.S. policy toward the Middle East … In the larger metropolitan areas, the Jewish-Zionist connection thoroughly pervades affluent financial, commercial, social, entertainment, and art circles.” (A. Lilienthal, The Zionist Connection, New York: Dodd, Mead, (1978), pp. 206, 209, 212, 218, 228, 229.)

Manipulating the U.S. political system is something that Jewish supremacists take great pride in. The single biggest donor to American politicians is the billionaire Israeli tycoon and media mogul Haim Saban. In January of 2007, it was revealed that he had donated approximately $13 million to various American political candidates. (“Israeli Billionaire Saban is Biggest Donor to US Politicians,” Ynet News, Jan. 23, 2007.) The New York Times has noted Saban’s ardent devotion to the Jewish state: “He has since emerged as perhaps the most politically connected mogul in Hollywood, throwing his weight and money around Washington, and increasingly, the world, trying to influence all things Israeli. ‘I’m a one-issue guy and my issue is Israel,’ he said.” (“Schlepping to Moguldom,” New York Times, Sept. 05, 2004.) The New Yorker reported that Saban’s “greatest concern… is to protect Israel, by strengthening the United States-Israel relationship.” (Connie Bruck, “The Influencer: An entertainment mogul sets his sights on foreign policy,” The New Yorker, May 10, 2010.) At a conference in Israel in 2009, Saban described his influence-peddling formula, his “three ways to be influential in American politics”: make donations to political parties, establish think tanks, and control media outlets. (Ibid.)

Saban and his kinsmen have been very hard at work trying to brainwash the American public with fallacious Zionist propaganda. Russia Today conducted a very informative interview with Grant F. Smith of the Institute for Research on Middle Eastern Policy about recently declassified documents pertaining to Israeli lobbying and propaganda efforts in the U.S. (“Inquiry exposes massive Israeli media manipulation campaign in US,” Russia Today, Aug. 20, 2010.) Here is the transcript of the interview:

RT Anchorwoman: Files declassified in America have revealed covert public relations and lobbying activities of Israel in the U.S. The National Archive made the documents public following a Senate investigation. They suggest Israel has been trying to shape media coverage of issues it regards as important. You can download the files from the web-site of the Institute for Research on Middle Eastern policy. And we can cross to Washington now and talk to Grant F. Smith who is a director at that Institute. I’d like to begin by asking you what exactly do these files reveal?

Grant F. Smith: These files are from a sealed Senate investigation which was the result of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the US Department of Justice looking into groups that brought $36 million into the US to plant stories in the US media and promote Israeli foreign policy objectives in the US. They’re extremely relevant because they revealed, for example, a vast effort to divert US attention from the Israeli Dimona nuclear weapons facility by saying it was merely a research center…

RT Anchorwoman: What about the media? How susceptible are they to Israeli lobbying?

Grant F. Smith: Well this reveals essentially that major US publications that were on the receiving end of the 36 million dollars really fell into line for a whole host of initiatives. Now, the Senate investigation was a failure, and they essentially heavily censored the Senate transcript and then put all of these extremely damning files into sealed records for years and years so that nobody could really see what was going on. And unfortunately the groups that were involved in this, that were ultimately forced to register as foreign agents and disclose their activities, they simply transferred all of these activities into a group called the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). So, it’s extremely enlightening for Americans to see how media influence functions by looking at internal documents from this investigation.

RT Anchorwoman: Well it also makes you ask how much will Americans really see if the US media is so affected by these lobbyists, no?

Grant F. Smith: That’s exactly the case because once again we’re replaying history. Now, instead of trying to divert attention away from nuclear weapons in the Middle East, a magazine — again The Atlantic — is on the forefront of an AIPAC drive to get the United States to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities, again now under the pretext that they’re nuclear weapons sites. So, for the United States it’s extremely important for people to see this media influence and the mechanics of it because over the passage of time it has only gotten worse.

RT Anchorwoman: What does this suggest about US policy in the Middle East? Is it being shaped around the interests of Israel as you see it?

Grant F. Smith: Well, we’ve done a lot of work over the years obtaining documents about Israeli policy initiatives in the United States. And the documentary record suggests a heavy influence on the parts of Israeli politicians and various para-statal groups that work tightly with Israel without disclosing those relationships. They have successfully built a campaign financing system in the United States that’s extremely effective at pushing Israeli objectives by withholding or dispersing campaign funding to US politicians. So there is a high degree of control that’s in place, but for your average American it’s almost completely hidden.

On numerous television interviews, the former CIA agent Michael Scheuer has lambasted the Israeli lobby, identifying them as an extremely malignant domestic enemy that owns and controls the U.S. Congress, guiding American presidents to do the bidding of the Israeli regime. In an interview with Lou Dobbs, the following exchange took place:

Lou Dobbs: Michael, both the British and the United States have reportedly made it very clear to Israel that they would prefer that there be no military action taken. What are your thoughts?

Michael Scheuer: Well, at least in the United States we’re pretty helpless. If the Israelis attacked Iran, the power of AIPAC and the lobby here, they own the Congress, will lead to our support to whatever the Israelis do I think. (“Michael Scheuer: Israel owns the Congress,” YouTube)

In another interview with Judge Napolitano of “Freedom Watch,” Scheuer accurately expressed the view that,

“the Israelis are an immensely malign influence in the United States. They steal our technology, they suborn government employees to spy for them and transfer documents, and certainly their influence through U.S. citizen groups like AIPAC on the Congress is politically corrupting.” (“Retired CIA Chief: Israelis immensely malign influence in United States,” YouTube)

These sentiments were even reflected by U.S. President Richard Nixon himself. In declassified White House tapes that were recently released to the public, the former President was recorded expressing disdain for Jews and speaking ominously about the Jewish grip over the American mass media and government. In White House tapes from February and March 1973, Nixon is heard saying that “the Jews are just a very aggressive and abrasive and obnoxious personality… [they are] born spies.” (“Nixon’s Jewish Problem,” Slate Magazine, Dec. 13, 2010.) In a candid conversation, Richard Nixon and the Rev. Billy Graham had the following exchange regarding the Jewish stranglehold over the mass media:

Nixon: “… Newsweek is totally [Jewish]. It’s all run by Jews and dominated by them in their editorial pages. The New York Times, The Washington Post, totally Jewish too.”

Graham: “This [Jewish] stranglehold [over the media] has got to be broken or this country is going to go down the drain.”

Nixon: “Do you believe that?”

Graham: “Yes sir.”

Nixon: “I can’t ever say it, but I believe it.”

In addition to their daunting lobbying apparatus and media monopoly, Jews are deeply entrenched inside the highest levels of the American government, directly pulling the strings of whichever puppet president happens to be sitting in the Oval Office. Jews openly brag about the members of their tribe who hold high political office in America. In November of 2008, the Jewish press was roaring with joy and glee after the new list of American Congressmen and Senators was released, showing that “[w]hen the new Congress debuts in January 2009, a record 45 Jews will take the oath of office: 32 in the House of Representatives and … 13 Jews in the Senate.” (“New Congress Has Record Number of Jews,” The Forward, Nov. 18 2008.) Real Jew News editor Brother Nathanael commented on the issue of Jewish infiltration of the U.S. Congress, stating:

“Jews now have capitol hill by the throat – both from the outside and from the inside. As if the powerful Jewish Lobbies from without are not enough for American Jewry to gain total control of the US Congress, Jews have infiltrated the halls of Capitol Hill with more seats than ever before in American history – in both the Senate and in the House. In fact, Jews chair many of the Senate and House committees which oversee every aspect of American affairs. [...] Making up less than 2% of the US population, Jews have insinuated themselves into the highest chairs of American government. How did they do this? … Money and media are the keys to Zionist political hegemony. In other words, America has the best Congress Jewish money can buy…” (“THE JEWS WHO RUN CONGRESS: ‘The Best Congress Jewish Money Can Buy’,” Real Jew News, July 07, 2010.)

ISRAEL-LOBBYThe Zionist website Jewish Virtual Library routinely produces lists of Jews who serve in the American government. The website names thirty-four Jews who have served in the U.S. Senate since 1845. In his comprehensive book “The Jews of Capitol Hill: A Compendium of Jewish Congressional Members” rabbi Kurt F. Stone documented that there have been two hundred Jewish men and women who have served in the United States Congress since 1841. President Bill Clinton brought sixty-four (64) Jews into his two administrations from 1993 to 2001, fifty-three (53) Jews infested the administration of George W. Bush during his two terms in office, and thirty- seven (37) Jews have, at one time, held top positions in the current Obama regime. (“The JEWS who Run Clinton and the USA,” Bible Believers Website / “The JEWS who Run Bush and the USA,” Bible Believers Website / “The JEWS who Run Obama and the USA,” Bible Believers Website) Bill Clinton — a Vietnam War draft dodger — was so enamored by Jewish intrigue that he reputedly told a Jewish audience in Canada that if Iraq or Iran were to ever attack Israel he would personally “grab a rifle, get in the trench and fight and die” to defend the Jewish state. (“Bubba: I’d fight and die for Israel,” The New York Post, Aug. 2, 2002.) Barack Obama’s extreme subservience to Israel and Jewish supremacists led a prominent Jewish-Zionist bigwig named Abner Mikva to declare Obama America’s first “Jewish President.” (James Petras, “America’s First Jewish President,” Voltaire Net, Dec. 12, 2008.) Obama’s Vice President Joseph Biden told an Israeli reporter: “I am a Zionist, you don’t have to be a Jew to be a Zionist.” (“Sen. Joe Biden on Shalom TV,” YouTube) Suffice to say, George W. Bush was not the ‘black sheep’ among this crooked camp of Zionist traitors.

With Jews representing only between two and three percent of the American population, these numbers illustrate the massively disproportionate influence of Jews in the American government. There can be no doubt that Jewish supremacists have essentially achieved dictatorial power in the United States, ordering Presidents, Congressmen and Senators around at a whim, often defaming them in the press if they are not compliant with Jewish aims. Woodrow Wilson, the 28th President of the U.S. who was himself a dedicated Jewish servant, came to regret his treasonous actions against the American people. In 1913, Wilson published a book in which he warned that the U.S. government was controlled by a sinister force that was hidden from public view, stating:

“…we have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated, governments in the civilized world — no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men.” (Wilson, Woodrow, and William Bayard Hale. The New Freedom; a Call for the Emancipation of the Generous Energies of a People. New York: Doubleday, 1913. p. 201)

VOLTAIRE-ZIONThe famous French philosopher Voltaire wisely said, “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” The tremendous power of Israel and the Jews in America is perfectly illustrated by the fact that criticism of either the nation of Israel or the Jews as a group is staunchly opposed, suppressed and censored from mainstream discourse. In America and the broader Western world, publicly criticizing Israel, Jews or Zionism is considered taboo – it is socially, as well as politically, dangerous. Any prominent individual who criticizes Jews quickly find themselves in hot water. Who could forget the infamous debacle involving actor Mel Gibson and his ‘drunken rant’ against the Jews, where he was pulled over by a police officer, who just happened to be Jewish, and reportedly blurted out: “the Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world!” Organized Jewry had their sights set on Gibson long before that episode. After he produced and directed the popular film “Passion of the Christ” in which he depicts Jews as the instigators of the alleged crucifixion of Jesus Christ, Organized Jewry and the Jewish-run press labeled him an ‘anti-Semite’ and a ‘racist’. After his run-ins with Organized Jewry, and the subsequent media campaign to crucify him for his “anti-Semitic rant,” Gibson’s career has never fully recovered. To save himself from being completely black-listed in Hollywood, he was forced to issue a groveling public apology to the Jews for his ‘eternal sin’ of offending them.

The ‘unspoken rule’ of never criticizing Jews or pointing out their pernicious influence even trickles down to the working class of America. In 2010, the former CNN television host Rick Sanchez mentioned the heavy Jewish presence in the media on a radio interview and was predictably fired from his position at CNN the following day. (“Rick Sanchez: Jon Stewart A ‘Bigot,’ Jews Run CNN & All Media,” Huffington Post, Oct. 01 2010.) In 2011, at an ‘Occupy LA’ protest, a substitute school teacher named Patricia McAllister was recorded in a video interview saying: “I think that the Zionist Jews who are running these big banks and the Federal Reserve… they need to be run out of this country.” Because of her honest remarks, Patricia found herself relieved of her teaching duties the following week. (“Patricia McAllister, LAUSD Teacher, Fired After Airing Anti-Semitic Views,” Huffington Post, Oct. 19 2011.) Anyone brave enough to utter even slight criticism of Israel or Jews is publicly targeted by relentless media attacks and defamation. There are many more examples of people being sacked for commenting on Jewish influence, but they are too numerous to mention them all. This extensive Jewish power, opined conservative writer Joe Sobran, is highly visible but completely off-limits to discuss openly. Sobran explained the paradoxical nature of Jewish power in this way:

“Talking about American politics without mentioning the Jews is a little like talking about the NBA without mentioning the Chicago Bulls. Not that the Jews are all-powerful, let alone all bad. But they are successful, and therefore powerful enough: and their power is unique in being off-limits to normal criticism even when it’s highly visible. They themselves behave as if their success were a guilty secret, and they panic, and resort to accusations, as soon as the subject is raised. Jewish control of the major media in the media age makes the enforced silence both paradoxical and paralyzing. Survival in public life requires that you know all about it, but never refer to it. A hypocritical etiquette forces us to pretend that the Jews are powerless victims; and if you don’t respect their victimhood, they’ll destroy you. It’s a phenomenal display not of wickedness, really, but of fierce ethnocentrism, a sort of furtive racial superpatriotism.” (Quoted in K. MacDonald. Separation and Its Discontents: Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Anti-Semitism. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1998.)

In their standard tradition of subverting public opinion and pushing for tyrannical laws that prohibit free speech and free thought — such as the notorious ‘Holocaust Denial’ and ‘Hate Speech’ laws that plague dozens of nations in Europe — Jews have actually pressured the U.S. government to take on the task of “combating anti-Semitism” in America and around the globe! In 2004, the U.S. government passed the “Global Anti-Semitism Review Act” which orders the U.S. State Department to “monitor global antisemitism, reporting annually to the United States Congress.” (“Global Anti-Semitism Review Act (October 8, 2004),” Jewish Virtual Library) Not only does this villainous piece of legislation speak of “monitoring anti-Semitism” but specifically orders the U.S. government to “continue to strongly support efforts to combat anti-Semitism worldwide through bilateral relationships and interaction with international organizations such as the OSCE, the European Union, and the United Nations.” (Ibid.) This treasonous act created a political body within the State Department called the “Office To Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism” which “advocates U.S. policy on anti-Semitism both in the United States and internationally, develops and implements policies and projects to support efforts to combat anti-Semitism.” Included in the U.S. government’s ridiculous definition of ‘anti-Semitism’ is the “vilification of Zionism, the Jewish national movement, and incitement against Israel.” (Ibid.) In 2010, the Zionist Organization of America pressured members of the U.S. Congress to request a crackdown on criticism of Jews and Israel on college campuses across the United States. (“U.S. lawmakers seek action against campus anti-Semitism,” Jewish Telegraphic Agency, July 13, 2010.) In August of 2012, California’s state assembly passed a resolution equating criticism of Israel with generic ‘anti-Semitism’ in a delusional effort to delegitimize and silence all criticism of the rogue Zionist regime on college campuses. (“California State Assembly passes resolution equating criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism,” Mondoweiss, Aug. 29, 2012.) The Associated Press reported:

“An Assembly resolution urging California colleges and universities to squelch nascent anti-Semitism also encouraged educators to crack down on demonstrations against Israel, angering advocates for Muslim students. With no debate, lawmakers on Tuesday approved a resolution that encourages university leaders to combat a wide array of anti-Jewish and anti-Israel actions.”

LENIN-RED-BOLSHEVISMIf these Stalinist bureaucrats got their way, all criticism of Jews, Judaism, Israel and Zionism — no matter how mild or soft — would be strictly forbidden by law, globally! The same people behind this brutal suppression of free speech today perfected their heinous tactics of muzzling political opponents under the savage system of Bolshevism in Russia and Eastern Europe. It is no wonder that the communist mass murderers Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky (Bronstein), and Molotov all made public pronouncements condemning ‘anti-Semitism’ as a capital crime against the state. Considering that the Soviet ‘state’ was entirely run by Jewish communist criminals, resistance to Jewish power was ruthlessly crushed with a vengeance. Many of the leading Soviet-Communist leaders are on record stating that anti-Semitism (opposition to Jewish domination) would be punished with death! In 1918, Lenin ordered all Soviet Deputies to “take uncompromising measures to tear the anti-Semitic movement out by the roots. Pogromists and pogrom-agitators are to be placed outside the law.” (Baron, Salo Wittmayer. The Russian Jew Under Tsars and Soviets. Macmillan, (1976), p. 180.) Leon Trotsky-Bronstein, the genocidal Jewish-Bolshevik kingpin who founded the “Red Army” of the Soviet Union, issued the same murderous directive, announcing that under his leadership all “pogromists,” a Bolshevik catchphrase for Russian freedom fighters resisting the Jewish takeover of their country, “shall be shot down on the spot without trial.” (The Ogden Examiner, Aug. 11, 1918, p. 24.) In 1934, Stalin reiterated Lenin’s and Trotsky’s barbaric decrees, writing: “In the U.S.S.R. anti-semitism is punishable with the utmost severity of the law as a phenomenon deeply hostile to the Soviet system. Under U.S.S.R. law active anti-semites are liable to the death penalty.” (Josef Stalin, Works Vol. 13) The top Soviet-Communist functionary Vyacheslav Molotov proudly acknowledged the fact that “in the Soviet Union actual anti-Semities are shot.” (Hunterberg, Max. Tragedy of the Ages: Anti-Semitism, the Root, Cause, and Cure. New York: Associated Press, 1937, p.144.)

Taking all of these facts together, it becomes a transparent reality that America is ruled by Jewish supremacists, not Jesuits, Luciferians, the Illuminati, WASP’s, Reptilians, Nazis, or a “Germanic Death Cult,” as some deceivers would have us believe. Criticizing other religious, ethnic, racial or political groups – such as Christians, Muslims, Mormons, Scientologists, Whites, the CIA , the FBI, the U.S. President or the U.S. government as a whole – is permissible to a great extent in America. The repercussions of criticizing or bad-mouthing any of those groups is certainly nowhere near as great as the consequences that are incurred when an individual publicly excoriates Jews or Israel – an observation which in and of itself illuminates the true power behind the throne of America, so to speak. Benjamin Freedman, a former Jew and great opponent of the Zionist conspiracy in his own right, said it best when he exclaimed: “Here in the United States, the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government… The Zionists and their co-religionists rule these United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country.” (1961 Speech at the Willard Hotel, Washington, D.C.) The foregoing proofs that I have furnished are strong enough to convince any logical person of the truth of that statement.

© 2013 Zander C. Fuerza

Download the complete book HERE

Posted in Masters of Deception Book | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Masters of Deception: Chapter Fifteen

MASTERS OF DECEPTION COVER 1CHAPTER FIFTEEN

The Neocons and the Holocaust®: Zionism’s Big Lie

Besides Al-Qaeda’s purported sponsorship of 9/11 and Saddam’s alleged “Weapons of Mass Destruction,” the neocons were intoxicated with a third monstrous myth: the holocaust story. Many of the most prominent Jewish neocons have acknowledged that their belief in the holocaust story lies at the very foundation of their Zionist fanaticism and lust for war with the perceived enemies of the Jews and Israel. Gal Beckerman, writing for the Jewish Forward, made note of the “holocaust consciousness” that enshrouds the thinking and worldview of Jewish neocons, writing:

“It was [Norman] Podhoretz, however, who gave neoconservatism its most explicitly Jewish cast. The August 1968 issue of Commentary featured Emil Fackenheim’s famous essay, “Jewish Faith and the Holocaust: A Fragment,” which included Fackenheim’s contention that after Auschwitz, Jews had a moral responsibility to defend Jewish interests so as not to hand Hitler a “posthumous victory.” By February 1972, Podhoretz himself wrote a piece titled, without irony, “Is It Good for the Jews?”

Holocaust consciousness was growing in the 1970s, as was a renewed sense of threat to Jews and a feeling that, as Podhoretz put it, the postwar “statute of limitations” on antisemitism had run out. Israel’s security, threatened in the Six Day War and the Yom Kippur War — both events that gave Jews existential pause — suddenly became a top American Jewish concern. Podhoretz came to identify more and more with the defense of Jews, and by the 1980s, half his articles on international affairs focused on Israel and threats to the Jewish people.” (“The Neoconservative Persuasion: Examining the Jewish roots of an intellectual movement,” The Forward, Jan. 06, 2006.)

The three prime engineers of the war in Iraq — Douglas Feith, Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz — have all conceded that it is the holocaust story that constitutes the engine that drives their calamitous policies of aggressive warfare. Speaking about what motivates his views on foreign policy, Richard Perle said:

“For those of us who are involved in foreign and defense policy today of my generation, the defining moment of our history was certainly the holocaust. It was destruction, a genocide of a whole people, and it was the failure to respond in a timely fashion to a threat that was clearly gathering. We don’t want that to happen again. When we have the ability to stop totalitarian regimes we should do so because when we fail to do so the results are catastrophic.” (“The War Party,” BBC)

A New York Times piece on Paul Wolfowitz noted his status as “one of Israel’s staunchest allies in the [Bush] administration” and explained that his worldview was,

“forged by family history… Brooklyn-born and raised in Ithaca, N.Y., Mr. Wolfowitz, 58, is the son of a Cornell University mathematician who escaped Poland after World War I. The rest of his father’s family perished in the Holocaust. ‘That sense of what happened in Europe in World War II has shaped a lot of my views,’ he said.” (Eric Schmitt, “The Busy Life of Being a Lightning Rod for Bush,” New York Times, April 22, 2002.)

Douglas Feith furnished some autobiographical material to explain why he is such a fervent promoter of war and death, telling journalist Jeffrey Goldberg:

“I had done a lot of reading, relative for a kid, about World War Two, and I thought about Chamberlain a lot. Chamberlain wasn’t popular in my house. What I was hearing from the antiwar movement, with which I had a fair amount of sympathy . . . were thoughts about how the world works, how war is not the answer. I mean, the idea that we could have peace no matter what anybody else in the world does didn’t make sense to me. It’s a solipsism. When I took all these nice-sounding ideas and compared it to my own little personal ‘Cogito, ergo sum,’ which was my understanding that my family got wiped out by Hitler, and that all this stuff about working things out-well, talking to Hitler to resolve the problem didn’t make any sense to me. The kind of people who put bumper stickers on their car that declare that ‘war is not the answer,’ are they making a serious comment? What’s the answer to Pearl Harbor? What’s the answer to the Holocaust? The surprising thing is not that there are so many Jews who are neocons but that there are so many who are not.” (“A Little Learning: What Douglas Feith knew, and when he knew it.,” The New Yorker, May 9, 2005.)

Expressing a deep hatred of gentiles and a desire to exterminate anyone who gets in the way of Jewish group interests, these three Zionist warmongers invoke nonsensical justifications in defense of their evil policies. The argument that they seem to be making, is that since some of their family members perished during the Second World War — along with the over 60 million others who also died in the war — a war instigated by the Jewish elite themselves — they now feel that they have an obligation to crush any possible ‘threat’ to Jewish world hegemony. Neocon crime boss Michael Ledeen also acknowledged the centrality of the holocaust story to his views. In an article entitled “The New Holocaust” (PJ Media, Dec. 22, 2010.) Ledeen writes that he has “spent a lot of time interviewing Holocaust survivors” and goes on to propagate the flaccid falsehood that:

“…unlike most of the Holocaust, the slaughter of contemporary Jews is not carried out in antiseptic gas chambers, but in the streets, markets, restaurants, airports, and skyscrapers of the modern world. These killers do not have the comforting distance that Nazi technology placed between killers and martyrs. The jihadis think of themselves as individual assassins, not deranged industrial managers, as did so many of Hitler’s men.”

Bradley Smith, the founder of the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust (CODOH), opined that this neocon obsession with, and blind belief in, the holocaust dogma of German WMD – the myth of the gas chambers – is what lies behind their sinister policies of open-ended aggression against the entire Arab and Muslim world, with the intention of bolstering Israeli military and economic supremacy in the Middle East. Smith writes:

We are left to imagine how this uninformed (I choose to trust that Wolfowitz is not willfully ignoring revisionist work on the gas chamber fraud) view of what happened between Germans and Jews during World War II influences how he morally justifies the creation of a Jewish state on Muslim land in the Middle East, the ensuing US alliance with Israel, and the war against Iraq which helps to secure Israel as a homeland for Jews, in the short run.” (“Paul Wolfowitz: the Blind Leading the Blind,” Outlaw History Newsletter, Nov. 23, 2004.)

The official account of the ‘holocaust’ is divorced from reality on a multitude of levels. The veracity of the claims made about ‘homicidal gas chambers’ in German concentration camps during the Second World War has been scientifically debunked by chemists and engineers such as Fred Leuchter, Germar Rudolf, Dr. William B. Lindsey and Walter Lüftl. The orthodox holocaust story has been cut to pieces by rigorous analysis and research done by revisionist scholars such as Ernst Zündel, Robert Faurisson, Arthur Butz, Mark Weber, Fredrick Töben, Carlo Mattogno, Jürgen Graf, Bradley Smith, David Cole and many others (whose works can be read for free online at VHO.org). Raul Hilberg, a leading holocaust dogmatist, was obliged to confess on the witness stand at the Toronto kangaroo court of the first Ernst Zündel trial in 1985 that there is neither documentary evidence nor any scientific proof of the holocaust. (“No scientific proof Jews exterminated: witness,” The Montreal Gazette, Jan. 18, 1985.) The French Emperor Napoleon wisely said that authorized history is merely a made-up fable agreed upon by the victors of any battle or war. Thus the professional deceivers calling themselves neoconservatives are not only upholding old lies that were used to justify the Zionist seizure of Arab land, but are continually concocting new lies with which to sucker Westerners into fighting more wars of aggression to secure the Zionist dream.

KABBALISTIC-SIX-MILLIONAt the root of the holocaust deception lies the Zionist desire to conquer what was Arab-held Palestine and form a Jewish ‘homeland’ in its place. This nefarious Zionist conspiracy was articulated in plain English by a prominent American-Jewish rabbi named Stephen S. Wise, an influential adviser to numerous U.S. Presidents, including Woodrow Wilson and Franklin D. Roosevelt. In 1900 — fourteen years before World War One and thirty-nine years before World War Two — rabbi Wise spoke of “6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism,” unveiling the kabbalistic ‘6,000,000’ figure in the context of a Zionist public relations effort to use perceived persecution of Jews as a way of garnering world sympathy for the creation of a Jewish state. (“ZIONISTS’ MASS MEETING: Rabbi Wise’s Address,” New York Times, June 11, 1900.) The grand exaggerations and fabrications of the holocaust story are indeed a critical component of this whole narrative, but the intricacies of the holocaust fraud is a subject for another book. Considering the vastness of the subject, I will simply mention a few examples of the previous attempts by Jews to submerge unsuspecting non-Jewish populations underneath a tidal wave of Jewish persecution stories, invoking the kabbalistic ‘six million’ figure with an obsessive, religious passion. This was usually done as an attempt to divert the world’s attention away from Jewish-inflicted atrocities, like the heinous murders that were being perpetrated by Jewish Bolsheviks in Russia and elsewhere in Europe. It was also intended to elicit public sympathy and support for Jewish political causes, primarily Zionism. Here are a few examples:

1) In 1902, the tenth edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica references “six million Jews” of Rumania and Russia being “systematically degraded.”

2) In 1905, the New York Times released a report on the social situation of the Jews in Russia, claiming that, “From 1890 to 1902 he [Constantine Petrovich Pobiedonostizeff] caused 6,000,000 Jewish families to be expelled from Russia.” (“POBIEDONOSTIZEFF RESIGNS.,” New York Times, Nov. 1, 1905.)

3) In 1906, a German-Jewish publicist named Dr. Paul Nathan disseminated claims about the mistreatment of “6,000,000 Jews” in Russia, alleging that the Russian government had set in motion a “solution to the Jewish question” which amounted to a policy of “systematic… murderous extermination.” (“Dr. Paul Natan’s View of Russian Massacre,” New York Times, Mar. 25, 1906.)

4) In 1910, the American Jewish Committee’s annual report claimed that since the year 1890 Russia “adopted a deliberate plan to expel or exterminate” 6,000,000 Jews. (“The American Jewish Yearbook,” American Jewish Committee, Sept. 23 1911 to Sept. 11 1912, p. 15.)

5) In 1911, at the tenth Zionist Congress in Basle, Switzerland, the co-founder of the World Zionist Organization Max Nordau made a startling prediction that “6,000,000 Jews” would soon be annihilated by European governments. (Hecht, Ben. Perfidy. New York: Messner, 1961. p. 254.)

6) In 1914, the New York Times made reference to “6,000,000 Jews” in the context of being in danger of becoming consumed in the ensuing world war. (“Appeal For Aid For Jews,” New York Times, Dec. 2, 1914.)

7) In 1915, about a year into World War One, Jewish leader Louis Marshall makes a dire proclamation alleging that the lives of “6,000,000 Jews” are at stake and that they are being “subjected to every manner of suffering and sorrow.” (“Jews’ Indifference to War Aid Rebuked,” New York Times, Jan. 14, 1915.)

8) On the 31st of October 1919, shortly after World War One had ended, the Governor of New York at the time, Martin H. Glynn, published an article in the American Hebrew Magazine entitled “The Crucifixion of Jews Must Stop” in which he speaks of the imminent destruction of “six million Jewish men and women,” calling it a “holocaust of human life.”

9) In 1919, the New York Times published a frantic article alleging that 6,000,000 Jews in Ukraine and Poland were being targeted to be “completely exterminated” in pogroms. (“Ukrainian Jews Aim To Stop Pogroms,” New York Times, Sept. 8, 1919.)

10) In 1921, another New York Times article alleges that 6,000,000 Jews in Russia “are facing extermination by massacre.” (“Begs America Save 6,000,000 In Russia,” New York Times, July 20, 1921.)

11) In 1936, Zionist kingpin Chaim Weizmann, in an effort to lobby the British government to permit mass Jewish immigration to Palestine, expressed the view that 6,000,000 Jews had “neither hope nor future” in Europe. (“Before The Royal Commission,” Jewish Western Bulletin, Dec. 11, 1936 / “The Jewish Case: Dr. Weizmann Before Royal Commission,” The London Times, Nov. 26, 1936.)

12) Also in 1936, a desperate appeal for the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine appeared in the New York Times. The article spoke of the “sufferings of millions of persecuted Jews” in “the European holocaust.” Zionists yearned for England to “throw open the gates of Palestine and let in the victimized and persecuted Jews escaping from the European holocaust,” asserting that “the restoration of the land of Israel to the children of Israel is the guiding star in this great struggle for a better world.” (“Americans Appeal For Jewish Refuge,” New York Times, May 31, 1936.) World War Two would not begin for another three years.

13) In 1938, seven years before the end of World War Two, Jews claim exactly six million Jews are victims of “governmental anti-Semitism and persecution.” (“Persecuted Jews Seen On Increase,” New York Times, Jan. 9, 1938.)

14) In 1939, a Jewish publication called The Jewish Criterion predicts that “the coming world war would be the annihilation of six million Jews in East and Central Europe.” (“Review of Events,” The Jewish Criterion (Pittsburgh), Oct. 13, 1939.)

15) In 1941, Nahum Goldmann, the president of the World Jewish Congress at the time, makes an ominous prediction that if the National Socialist Germans are to achieve final victory “6,000,000 Jews in Europe are doomed to destruction.” (“Doom of European Jews Seen If Hitler Wins,” The Palm Beach Post, June 25, 1940.)

16) In November and December of 1944, with a full six months left of the war still to be fought, articles began appearing in Jewish publications already alleging that exactly 6,000,000 Jews had been killed. “Six Million Jews Listed Slaughtered” was the heading of an article published in the November 28, 1944, edition of the Pittsburgh Post. On the same day, the Palestine Post ran the heading “Six Millions Murdered”. These stories were all based on the preposterous claims of Ilya Ehrenburg, a Jewish-Soviet communist propagandist who, in March of 1945, several months before fighting would cease, again prematurely announced that “the world now knows that Germany has killed six million Jews.” (Soviet War News, Mar. 15, 1945.)

That is just a small sample of Jewish persecution propaganda, alleging an imminent “holocaust of six million Jews,” emanating from Zionist media sources. What it shows is that Zionist Jews have been promoting the kabbalistic fable of “six million Jews on the brink of extermination” as a foregone conclusion bound to happen for many years before, during and after World War One. This is documented more thoroughly by Don Heddesheimer in his book “The First Holocaust: Jewish Fundraising Campaigns With Holocaust Claims During and After World War One”. Even as far as the official account is concerned, the figure of ‘six million’ Jewish deaths in their claimed ‘holocaust’ during World War Two was laid to rest long ago. Historian Mark Weber has noted that the “Auschwitz story has changed drastically over the years.” In 1990, the Auschwitz state museum officially revised the alleged death toll there from the absurd figure of 4 million — which was uncritically accepted as ‘fact’ for decades — to 1 or 1.5 million. Other prominent historians have said the total amount of deaths in Auschwitz may be as low as 500,000, whereas revisionists calculate that somewhere between 150,000 and 350,000 Jews and non-Jews died in Auschwitz from all causes, mainly disease and starvation. (Mark Weber, “Auschwitz: Myths and Facts,” Institute for Historical Review, Sept. 2009.) Majdanek, a German concentration camp in Poland, was claimed to be the resting place of 1.5 million murdered victims until, in recent years, the official authorities there drastically reduced the number multiple times, now arriving at a modest figure of 79,000, a bare fraction of its former magnitude. Revisionist historians have arrived at an even lower number. (Jürgen Graf, “A Revisionist Analysis of Majdanek Concentration Camp,” Revisionist History) The 1963 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica speaks of “2,000,000 people, mostly Jews” who were allegedly done to death by the Germans in Mauthausen, a concentration camp in Austria. Establishment sources were forced to concede that this figure is yet another grotesque exaggeration, now placing the Jewish death toll at that camp somewhere around 14,000. (“Mauthausen,” United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Website)

In a rare display of honesty, the Israeli author Tom Segev revealed that the oft-repeated figure of five million non-Jewish victims of Hitler and National Socialism is a tissue of lies. In his book “Simon Wiesenthal: The Life and Legends,” Segev explained that Simon Wiesenthal, the infamous ‘Nazi Hunter’ whose boisterous penchant for fraudulent and exaggerated claims are legend, conjured this figure out of thin air as a marketing ploy to elicit non-Jewish interest in holocaust lore — it has no basis in reality. (Deborah E. Lipstadt, “Simon Wiesenthal and the Ethics of History,” Jewish Review of Books) When taken together, the official reductions of ‘holocaust’ death figures — including the five million gentile victims invented by Wiesenthal — amounts to over 11,000,000 fabricated victims of the Germans! On top of that, there are millions of Jews who claim to be “survivors” of the holocaust. On page 81 of his book “The Holocaust Industry,” Jewish scholar Norman Finkelstein recalled a question that his mother used to ask: “If everyone who claims to be a [holocaust] survivor actually is one, then who did Hitler kill?” Evidently, Hitler did not order the killing of very many Jews at all. His policy all along was never one of extermination, but rather forced deportation.

LITTLE-BOY-HOLOHOAX-BRAINWASHINGYet why, despite these official admissions and astonishing discoveries that have made a gargantuan dent in the sacrosanct “six million dead Jews” figure, are people still being taught in school that this many Jews perished in the Second World War? Why do the media, like trained parrots, endlessly repeat this number? A clue as to why this is was disclosed by the ‘holocaust’ pope Raul Hilberg. Speaking about the Jewish fixation on the ‘six million’ number he said, “call it religious if you like.” (“The war on truth,” The Guardian, Mar. 12, 2001.) Indeed, the holocaust story itself is not a matter of history but a matter of religion — a synthetic mythos designed to pacify the gentiles, paving the way for the creation of Israel and Jewish world dominion. Ian J. Kagedan, a top official of the Jewish-Masonic group B’nai B’rith, let slip the Jewish supremacist agenda underpinning the widespread promotion of the holocaust myth. In 1991, Kagedan said that memorializing the holocaust story “is central to the new world order” and that achieving their “quest of a “new world order” depends on our learning the Holocaust’s lessons.” (Toronto Star, Nov. 26, 1991.) This “New World Order” of global Jewish domination was promised to the leaders of American Jewry by the dedicated Zionist servant Arthur Greenwood, a member of the British War Cabinet during the Second World War. In a vocal pledge of servitude to World Jewry, Greenwood proclaimed that upon Hitler’s defeat in the war Jews everywhere would be given an opportunity to “make a distinctive and constructive contribution in the rebuilding of the world.” (“New World Order Pledged To Jews,” New York Times, Oct. 8, 1940.)

This analysis would not be complete without mentioning the lies that fomented the first Gulf War and their holocaust connection. Most people are unaware of the circumstances that facilitated the first Gulf War between the United States and Iraq. When Saddam Hussein moved his military forces into Kuwait on August 2, 1990, the Zionist Lobby was itching to use this action as an excuse to bomb Iraq and remove Saddam Hussein from power. The American public, however, was not eager to go to war with Saddam and did not feel obliged to get involved in inter-Arab squabbles in the Middle East. To counter the anti-war sentiment, a scheming Jewish-Zionist official in the U.S. government orchestrated a colossal propaganda hoax with which to demonize Iraq and drive the U.S. into war against Saddam and his forces. A short time after Saddam’s occupation of Kuwait, Tom Lantos, the late Jewish democratic Senator from California, created a phony ‘human rights’ organization called the “Congressional Human Rights Foundation”. The group was a front for the Jewish-run public relations firm Hill & Knowlton, which shared the same office building as Lantos’ organization. In October of 1991, Lantos organized a totally scripted conference called the “Congressional Human Rights Caucas” in which Kuwaiti actors posing as ‘downtrodden victims’ of Saddam’s aggression against Kuwait were paid to give false testimony. (“To Sell A War,” CBC News: The Fifth Estate) The star of this Zionist-produced show was a young 15-year-old Kuwaiti girl who appeared at the hearing using the assumed name “Nayirah.” She gave a tearful testimony about how she witnessed atrocities committed by Iraqi soldiers in Kuwait with her own eyes, stating:

“While I was there, I saw the Iraqi soldiers come into the hospital with guns, and go into the room where . . . babies were in incubators. They took the babies out of the incubators, took the incubators, and left the babies on the cold floor to die.” (Ibid.)

Author John R. MacArthur observed that, “Of all the accusations made against the dictator [Saddam Hussein] none had more impact on American public opinion than the one about Iraqi soldiers removing 312 babies from their incubators and leaving them to die on the cold hospital floors of Kuwait City.” (“How PR Sold the War in the Persian Gulf,” PR Watch) It was later revealed that “Nayirah” was a member of the Kuwaiti Royal Family, the daughter of Saud Nasir al-Sabah, Kuwait’s Ambassador to the U.S. She spoke perfect American English without an accent, having lived in the U.S. her whole life. She had been given her lines and trained in the art of acting by the public relations firm Hill & Knowlton. (Ibid.) Her story was a complete fabrication, a lie from A to Z. Nayirah’s false testimony was trumpeted around the world by mainstream media outlets and phony ‘human rights’ groups, and even at the UN by lying Kuwaiti officials seeking Western support in their struggle against Iraq. This fabricated story was the single most critical piece of propaganda that turned the tides of American public and government opinion in favor of war against Saddam. President George H. W. Bush and his top Jewish adviser, the notorious war criminal Henry Kissenger, used it as the casus belli for their policy of aggression in the Gulf.

During the hearing, Lantos and some of his paid stooges incessantly made comparisons between Saddam Hussein and Adolf Hitler, and Iraq and Nazi Germany. Lantos, a Jew of Hungarian origin, claims to be one of the countless millions of ‘holocaust survivors,’ so he is well versed in the art of lying for a political cause. At the heart of his agenda to instigate an American attack against Iraq was certainly his commitment to the cause of Zionism, seeking the destruction of one of Israel’s main adversaries in the Middle East, Iraq and Saddam Hussein. Lantos, who thankfully is now deceased, was one of the featured stars of Steven Spielberg’s egregious holocaust hoax documentary “The Last Days”. The utter fraudulence of Spielberg’s film and the testimony of the interviewees featured in it was exposed in a counter-documentary called “The Last Days of the Big Lie”.

Jewish-Press-Iraqi-Gas-Chambers-HoaxTo top off all of this disgraceful deception on the part of Jewish supremacists and their evil minions, there is another piece of information worth drawing attention to. In a stunning example of the Jewish propensity to spread malicious lies about their enemies, a ridiculous display of anti-Iraqi propaganda was featured in the New York-based Jewish Press, then calling itself “the largest independent Anglo-Jewish weekly newspaper,” which had on its title page on February 21, 1991: “IRAQIS HAVE GAS CHAMBERS FOR ALL JEWS”. Moreover, the front cover announcement of volume 12, number 1 (spring 1991), of Response, a periodical published by the Jewish Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles, was: “GERMANS PRODUCE ZYKLON B IN IRAQ (Iraq’s German-made gas chamber)”. Nobody took these claims seriously, and they were patently untrue, but it goes to show that Jews are not very inventive when it comes to war propaganda, simply repeating lame anti-German canards from the Second World War.

The lesson to be learned from all of this is that Jews love to tell atrocity tales involving young children as the victims. This type of propaganda is very effective at inflaming public opinion because nobody, other than Zionist Jews, likes to see innocent children suffer and die. While Jewish propagandists promulgate phony tales of Germans and Iraqis slaughtering children, the Israeli army actually guns down little Palestinian children in the streets of Gaza and the West Bank on a daily basis, having deliberately murdered tens of thousands of innocent children since the earliest days of the Zionist takeover of Palestine led by the Irgun and Stern gangs. In “Operation Cast Lead,” Israel’s barbaric and lethal siege against the people of Gaza in 2008/09, about one quarter of the nearly 1400 Palestinian casualties were children; of the 5300 injured, 1606 were children. (“Operation Cast Lead, 27 Dec. ’08 to 18 Jan. ’09,” B’tselem, Jan. 01, 2011.) Journalist Stephen Lendman reported that “[s]ince the September 2000 Second Intifada, Israeli forces killed 1179 children, including 865 in Gaza as part of a decades-long policy of collectively punishing millions of Palestinians in the Occupied Territories, mostly civilian men, women, and children.” (“Israeli War Crimes Against Children During Operation Cast Lead,” Global Research, June 12, 2009.) The Jewish lust for the blood of innocent children was perfectly epitomized in an unnerving interview featuring Madeleine Albright, the Secretary of State under Bill Clinton. In an interview with CBS 60 Minutes, the Zionist Jew Albright was asked if the inhuman economic sanctions imposed on Iraq by the U.S. government after the first Gulf War, which caused the deaths of over 500,000 Iraqi children, was “worth the price.” With a sick look in her eyes, Albright coldly responded: “I think this is a very hard choice, but we think the price was worth it.” (“Punishing Saddam,” CBS News 60 Minutes, May 12, 1996.) These facts reveal who the real child-killers are in this world.

Why are Jews such prolific peddlers of lies and falsehoods? The Jewish religion actually advocates lying to and deceiving non-Jews. In his scholarly study “The Truth About the Talmud,” revisionist historian Michael Hoffman noted that in Baba Kamma 113a of the Babylonian Talmud it condones the use of lies and subterfuges to “circumvent a Gentile.” Rabbi Joseph Telushkin plainly admitted that “Jewish tradition is tolerant of those who bend the truth… Jewish law is remarkably tolerant of ‘white lies.’” (“White Lies,” My Jewish Learning Website) Each year, religious Jews undergo a ritual in which they pledge themselves to be recklessly dishonest, relinquishing all future oaths and promises. This ritual, called the “Kol Nidre,” is considered the holiest of Jewish prayers. Critics, however, have called the prayer a license to lie and cheat. (Rev. Ted Pike, “Kol Nidre: Judaism’s License To Lie,” Truth Tellers, Nov. 17, 2008.) On the eve of the ‘Day of Atonement,’ Jews recite these words:

“All vows, obligations, oaths, and anathemas, whether called ‘ḳonam,’ ‘ḳonas,’ or by any other name, which we may vow, or swear, or pledge, or whereby we may be bound, from this Day of Atonement until the next (whose happy coming we await), we do repent. May they be deemed absolved, forgiven, annulled, and void, and made of no effect; they shall not bind us nor have power over us. The vows shall not be reckoned vows; the obligations shall not be obligatory; nor the oaths be oaths.” (“KOL NIDRE,” Jewish Encyclopedia, 1906.)

JUDEO-COMMUNISTSThe communist doctrine — the spawn of Jewish supremacist ideologues — also championed the use of lies and subterfuge to accomplish political objectives. The communist idol and first Soviet dictator Vladimir Lenin, a monstrous Jewish criminal who founded the Cheka, the genocidal secret police apparatus of the Soviet regime, once said that “a lie told often enough becomes the truth.” (M. Kumar. Dictionary of Quotations. APH Publishing: New Delhi, India, 2008. p. 134) Promises, Lenin surmised, “are like pie-crusts—made to be broken.” (LIFE Magazine, Dec. 23, 1957.) Extolling the virtues of deception, Lenin instructed his underlings to “utilize all possible cunning and illegal methods, deny and conceal the truth.” (“The present stage of Soviet global expansion: sources, goals and prospects,” U.S. Army Institute for Advanced Russian and East European Studies, p. 29.) In contrast, compare the maniacal teachings of Judaism and its birth-child Bolshevism with that of National Socialism. The ideology of Adolf Hitler and his National Socialist German Workers’ Party (NSDAP) is exactly the opposite of Judaism and Bolshevism, preaching honor, integrity, loyalty, pride and truth. (Gottfried Feder, “Programme of the Party of Hitler, the NSDAP and its General Conceptions,” Zentralverlag der NSDAP, 1932.) National Socialism is the most vilified political philosophy on earth due to its staunch opposition to Jewish domination. Despite the deliberate distortions and hatred surrounding Hitler and his movement, the true facts of the time paint quite a drastically different picture of the man and the philosophy he espoused. Unlike Bolshevism and its father, Judaism, National Socialism practiced a rather benevolent strategy when it came to propaganda. The NSDAP’s “Handbook On Propaganda” itself states on page 5:

… we are not propagandizing lies and untruths as England did during the War, but rather we are preaching freedom and prosperity, socialism and patriotism to our confused people. Our struggle and our propaganda have one supreme principle: to take truth and only truth as the foundation of our propaganda.”

The National Socialist propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels, dubbed a “big liar” by the Jewish-dominated press, always held that the best propaganda is that which does no more than serve the truth. In 1935, at a Nuremberg rally, Goebbels righteously explained that, “Good propaganda does not need to lie … It has no reason to fear the truth. … A propaganda that lies proves that it has a bad cause. It cannot be successful in the long run.” (“Goebbels at Nuremberg — 1934,” Calvin German Propaganda Archive) The late Jacques Ellul, a French professor of history and sociology at the University of Bordeaux and a former anti-German partisan during World War Two, conceded that Goebbels “never stopped battling for propaganda to be as accurate as possible.” (Garth S. Jowett and Victoria O’Donnell. Readings in Propaganda and Persuasion: New and Classic Essays. SAGE, 2006, p. 48, note 47) Hitler, in his autobiography ‘Mein Kampf,’ repeated a phrase coined by the German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer that the Jews are the ‘Great Master of Lies,’ explaining that “[f]rom time immemorial … the Jews have known better than any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited.” (Mein Kampf, Murphy Translation, p. 134) Hitler harshly condemned the use of “big lies” in political propaganda and identified Jewish supremacists and their tool of Marxism as the source of this technique. (Ibid.) Hitler stressed that those who are too foolish or dimwitted to recognize the deceitful nature of supremacist Jews will “never be able to lend a hand in helping truth to prevail.” (Ibid.)

Hitler’s profound wisdom came through in his extraordinary speeches and writings. He was vastly knowledgeable and possessed expert reasoning abilities. He was a tremendously skillful logical thinker and had the uncanny gift of foresight. Writing about the Jewish lust for a ‘homeland’ in Palestine, Hitler sniffed out the insincerity of this Zionist endeavor, suggesting that the Jews did not actually want a state of their own for the purpose of living there. The real aim of Zionism, Hitler theorized, was to establish a “central organization for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.” (Mein Kampf, Chapter XI: Nation and Race) In much the same way that Osama bin Laden described the desire of Jewish supremacists to control and subjugate their foes, Hitler once stated that the modus operandi of International Jewry is to “exploit nations and make them the slaves of their international guild of criminals.” (Adolf Hitler, and Max Domarus. The Essential Hitler: Speeches and Commentary. Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers, Illinois. 2007. pp. 406-412.)

Undoubtedly, the Zionist propaganda of the past is propelling the Zionist propaganda of the present. In essence, these atrocious lies are designed to drive a wedge between the Christian world and the Muslim world, railroading gentiles into a third world war in which the only real victor will be World Jewry and their fabricated nation-state of Israel. Most importantly, the religious creed of these neoconservative warmongers is the holocaust fable – it is the backbone of neocon thinking. This dangerous convergence of historical untruths, and the blind acceptance of these falsehoods by the majority of the masses of people, is leading the entire planet toward perpetual hostilities and bloodshed.

© 2013 Zander C. Fuerza

Download the complete book HERE

Posted in Masters of Deception Book | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Masters of Deception: Chapter Fourteen

MASTERS OF DECEPTION COVER 1CHAPTER FOURTEEN

Neoconservatism: A Treacherous Guild of Jewish Imperialists

ISRAEL-US-ZIONISMIt is impossible to understand 9/11 and the illegal wars that followed without examining the diabolical intrigues of what are known as the “neoconservatives.” This tightly-knit network of ‘intellectuals’ and political lobbyists are first-class warmongers. They were the driving force behind the genocidal U.S. war against Iraq and are still today aggressively advocating for new wars against Arabs and Muslims in the Middle East. The neocons are, at their very core, a racist cult of psychopathic Jewish supremacists. This mendacious Jewish clique formed a dangerous Zionist fifth-column inside the United States, burrowing their way into the highest echelons of power in the White House and the Pentagon, during the Bush administration. Operating as de-facto agents of the Israeli government, these Zionist schemers were tasked with harnessing American military might in the service of Israel. To the detriment of the world, especially Iraqis, Afghans and Palestinians, these evil sociopathic criminals succeeded in their wicked objective of dragging the U.S. into several senseless wars of conquest in the Middle East, needlessly causing the deaths of millions of innocent people. The former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad once stated: “The Jews rule the world by proxy. They get others to fight and die for them.” A glance at the neoconservative warlords and their hidden Jewish agenda validate his every word.

The Jewish origins and agenda of neoconservatism, much like the Jewish origins and agenda of Communism, is a carefully guarded secret that has been hidden from the general public. No mainstream history text dares to mention this fact — almost no prominent professors of political science are willing to broach it for fear of being labeled ‘anti-Semitic.’ The movement itself was born and codified in the United States in the early 1960s. Several Jewish-Marxist intellectuals and agitators from the Trotskyite camp – ideological disciples of the Jewish-Communist theorist and mass murderer Leon Trotsky – conceived this malicious doctrine of death. Like its counterpart Bolshevism, Jewish extremists have used neoconservatism as a carnivorous tool of destruction to root out the enemies of Zionism in the Middle East. Metapedia, the Alternative Encyclopedia, surmised that,

“Neoconservatism is a political ideology with origins in the Marxist Trotskyite movement that has played a critical role in formulating American foreign policy, especially since the 9/11 attacks. The ideology represents the embrace of Zionism and is totally focused upon the racial supremacy and group interests of Jews and the Israeli state. Neoconservatism can be seen as a strategy replacing the previous Jewish objective of Marxist world revolution.” (“Neoconservatism,” Metapedia)

Author Michael Collins Piper explained that the neocons are nothing more than “Trotskyite communists of the old school who re-tooled and re-configured their own philosophy in order to adapt it to the needs of the modern period.” (“The Judas Goats: The Enemy Within,” American Free Press, (2006), p. 28.) Gal Beckerman, a Jewish writer for the Jewish publication The Forward, put it this way:

“Acknowledging the Jewishness of neoconservatism has always triggered the red, flashing lights of antisemitism, especially since the start of the Iraq War…. But there is some truth to the suspicion. If there is an intellectual movement in America to whose invention Jews can lay sole claim, neoconservatism is it. …it is a fact that as a political philosophy, neoconservatism was born among the children of Jewish immigrants and is now largely the intellectual domain of those immigrants’ grandchildren.” (“The Neoconservative Persuasion: Examining the Jewish roots of an intellectual movement,” The Forward, Jan. 06, 2006.)

Notable among the ideological founders of neoconservatism were Irving Kristol, Irving Howe, Daniel Bell, Nathan Glazer, Norman Podhoretz and his wife Midge Decter, Max Shachtman, Albert Wohlstetter, and Leo Strauss. All Jews, avid Marxists and staunch Zionists, this coterie of crooks formulated a duplicitous plan for the infiltration and subversion of the “right-wing” of American politics, launching a ‘putsch’ to neutralize the conservative movement and Republican Party, shaping them into a wing of Zionism. Benjamin Ginsberg, a Jewish political scientist and professor at Johns Hopkins University, pointed out the communist roots of the neoconservatives, noting that “the neocons are internationalists. Many neocons were at one time liberal Democrats or, in some cases, even Socialists or Marxists.” (Ginsberg, Benjamin. The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1993. p. 231.) He also keenly observed their essentially Jewish ethnic motivation for shifting from the left to the right side of the political spectrum, attributing it to tribal loyalties and concern for the well-being of Israel:

“One major factor that drew them [the Jewish neocons] inexorably to the right was their attachment to Israel and their growing frustration during the 1960s with a Democratic party that was becoming increasingly opposed to American military preparedness and increasingly enamored of Third World causes [e.g., Palestinian rights]. In the Reaganite right’s hard-line anti-communism, commitment to American military strength, and willingness to intervene politically and militarily in the affairs of other nations to promote democratic values (and American interests), neocons found a political movement that would guarantee Israel’s security.” (Ibid.)

Ginsberg revealed that the ‘conservative’ philosophy espoused by these Marxist Jews was nothing more than a mask – a facade that provided a convenient smokescreen for their real Zionist motivations:

“A number of Jews ascertained for themselves that Israeli security required a strong American commitment to internationalism and defense. Among the most prominent Jewish spokesman for this position was Norman Podhoretz, editor of Commentary Magazine. Podhoretz had been a liberal and a strong opponent of the Vietnam War. But by the early 1970s he came to realize that continued American support for Israel depended upon continued American involvement in international affairs – from which it followed that American withdrawal into [isolationism] represented a direct threat to the security of Israel. This was one major reason that Podhoretz broke with liberals…” (Ibid., pp. 204, 231.)

In 1973, Irving Kristol, the Marxist-Zionist Jew who has been called the “godfather of neoconservatism,” let slip his real agenda when he said:

“Senator McGovern is very sincere when he says that he will try to cut the military budget by 30%. And this is to drive a knife in the heart of Israel… Jews don’t like big military budgets. But it is now in the interests of the Jews to have a large and powerful military establishment in the United States… American Jews who care about the survival of the state of Israel have to say, no, we don’t want to cut the military budget, it is important to keep that military budget big, so that we can defend Israel.” (Congress Bi-Weekly, a publication of the American Jewish Congress, 1973.)

Irving Kristol was quite frank in his pro-Zionist view that the U.S. should support Israel even if it is not in America’s national interest to do so. He once said that,

“Large nations, whose identity is ideological, like the Soviet Union of yesteryear and the United States of today, inevitably have ideological interests in addition to more material concerns…. That is why we feel it necessary to defend Israel today, when its survival is threatened. No complicated geopolitical calculations of national interest are necessary.” (Seltzer, Irwin. Neoconservatism. Atlantic Books, 2004, p. 36.)

Norman Podhoretz, a Marxist-Zionist Jew and early progenitor of the neoconservative philosophy, admitted that the safety and hegemony of Israel is at the heart of neoconservative thinking. In his own memoir he confessed:

“There was, to be sure, one thing that many of even the most passionately committed American Zionists were reluctant to do, and that was to face up to the fact that continued American support for Israel depended upon continued American involvement in international affairs – from which it followed that an American withdrawal into the kind of isolationist mood that prevailed most recently between the two world wars, and that now looked as though it might soon prevail again, represented a direct threat to the security of Israel.” (Norman Podhoretz, “Breaking Ranks: A Political Memoir,” Harper & Row, 1979.)

Prime among the early theoretical forebearers of neoconservatism was Leo Strauss, another Marxist-Zionist Jew. Strauss taught political science at the University of Chicago and was an influential teacher of many of the top neocons who would later go on to usurp the Bush administration and orchestrate the war against Iraq in 2003. Stauss’s political philosophy was Machiavellian in nature, whereby he advocated the perpetual deception of the public by those in power. Noam Chomsky has argued that Strauss’s theory is a form of Leninism, in which society should be led by a group of elite vanguards whose job is to protect liberal society against the dangers of excessive individualism, and by creating inspiring myths to trick the masses into believing that they are fighting against evil. Journalist Seymour Hersh opined that Strauss endorsed noble lies, “myths used by political leaders seeking to maintain a cohesive society.” (“Selective Intelligence,” The New Yorker, May 12, 2003.) As a youth growing up in Germany, Stauss embraced political Zionism and became an activist for the movement. At age 17, Strauss became a dedicated disciple of the extremist Zionist leader Vladimir Jabotinsky. (“Leo Strauss: Strauss and Zionism,” Wikipedia) The connection with Jabotinsky is a common theme among the neocons and the murderous Israeli politicians with whom they are intimately associated.

In addition to all of the Jewish-owned mass media outlets that have given the Jewish neocons a platform to disseminate their hateful propaganda, they established a vast and harrowing conglomeration of magazines, journals, periodicals and think-tanks with which to promote and advance their pernicious policies of war and aggression. Some of their publications include:

* Commentary Magazine (founded in 1945 by the American Jewish Committee; neocon godfathers Irving Kristol and Norman Podhoretz served as editors)
* National Review (founded in 1955 by Zionist agent William F. Buckley)
*The Weekly Standard (founded in 1995; chief editor is William Kristol, son of Irving Kristol)
* The New Republic
* The National Interest (founded by Irving Kristol in 1985)
* The Public Interest

Kevin MacDonald is a professor of psychology at the University of California-Longbeach, who has authored several books, viewing Jews and Judaism as an evolutionary group strategy. He produced a list of the most prominent Pro-Israel and neocon groups in the U.S. in his well-written study entitled “Understanding Jewish Influence”. These organizations include:

* AEI: American Enterprise Institute—A neoconservative think tank; produces and disseminates books and articles on foreign and domestic policy; http://www.aei.org.
* AIPAC: American Israel Public Affairs Committee—The main pro-Israel lobbying organization in the U.S., specializing in influencing the U.S. Congress; http://www.aipac.org.
* CSP: Center for Security Policy—Neoconservative think tank specializing in defense policy; formerly headed by Douglas Feith, CSP is now headed by Frank Gaffney; the CSP is strongly pro-Israel and favors a strong U.S. military; http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org.
* JINSA: Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs—Pro-Israel think tank specializing in promoting military cooperation between the U.S. and Israel; http://www.jinsa.org.
* MEF: Middle East Forum—Headed by Daniel Pipes, the MEF is a pro-Israel advocacy organization overlapping with the WINEP but generally more strident; http://www.meforum.org.
* PNAC: Project for the New American Century—Headed by Bill Kristol, the PNAC issues letters and statements signed mainly by prominent neocons and designed to influence public policy; http://www.newamericancentury.org.
* SD/USA: Social Democrats/USA—“Left-neoconservative” political organization advocating pro-labor social policy and pro-Israel, anticommunist foreign policy; http://www.socialdemocrats.org.
* WINEP: Washington Institute for Near East Policy—Pro-Israel think tank specializing in producing and disseminating pro-Israel media material; http://www.washingtoninstitute.org.
* ZOA: Zionist Organization of America—Pro-Israel lobbying organization associated with the more fanatical end of the pro-Israel spectrum in America; http://www.zoa.org.

A 2003 documentary produced by the BBC called The War Party offers great insight into the behind-the-scenes machinations of the Jewish neocons in Washington. In the film, British reporter Steve Bradshaw follows around several high-profile neocons in the run-up to the war in Iraq. He attended some of their meetings and conducted one-on-one interviews with the biggest players in neoconservatism, including numerous high-ranking Bush administration officials who were devout neocons. In the film, a number of top neocons brag about their successful usurpation of the Bush administration and American foreign policy; some even admitted the Jewishness of the movement. Richard Perle, who headed the powerful “Defense Policy Board” in the Pentagon under Bush, acknowledged that “the President of the United States on issue after issue has reflected the thinking of neoconservatives.” Bill Kristol, a Jewish neocon kingpin who is the son of Irving Kristol and editor of The Weekly Standard, boasted that “George Bush’s current foreign policy is basically a neoconservative foreign policy.” Meyrav Wurmser, a neocon Jewess who founded the Zionist propaganda outlet “The Middle East Media Research Institute” (MEMRI), was obliged to confess: “Yes, many of us [neocons] are Jewish… Most of us, all of us in fact, are Pro-Israel. Neocon Jew Eliot Cohen, a member of the Defense Policy Board in the Pentagon under Bush, complained that in Washington the term ‘neoconservative’ is often used as a euphemism for ‘Jew.’ “Well sometimes the word neoconservative is used when what they really would like to say is ‘Jew’… and as a Jew I find it offensive,” said Cohen.

A look at the roster of the Project for the New American Century group proves this notion to be correct; ‘neoconservative’ can accurately be considered synonymous with ‘Zionist Jew.’ This warmongering neocon think-tank was founded in 1997 by two Jewish neocon kingfish, Bill Kristol and Robert Kagan. In the tradition of his father, PNAC’s founder Bill Kristol let slip the real Zionist objectives behind his subversive lobbying activities. Despite his disingenuous rhetoric about “global crusades for democracy,” Kristol’s chief concern is the power and well-being of Israel. He told the Jerusalem Post (27th July 2000): “I’ve always thought it was best for Israel for the US to be generally engaged and generally strong, and then the commitment to Israel follows from a general foreign policy.” A look at the authors and signatories of any given PNAC document show an abundance of Jewish names, some of which are: Mark Gerson (PNAC project director), Randy Scheunemann (PNAC project director), Charles Krauthammer, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, Elliott Abrams, Eliot Cohen, Dov Zakheim, Paula Dobriansky, Aaron Friedberg, Peter W. Rodman, Michael Goldfarb, Stephen P. Rosen, Midge Decter, I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, Norman Podhoretz, John Podhoretz, Kenneth Adelman, Reuel Marc Gerecht, Robert B. Zoellick, Donald Kagan, John Lehman, and so on. (“Project for the New American Century: Persons Associated With PNAC,” Wikipedia) In total, at least half of PNAC’s members and signatories were Jewish. The non-Jewish members all had long-standing ties with the Jewish lobby, serving as nothing more than useful tools for Jewish intrigue. There have been a number of corrupt non-Jews who have achieved prominent status within the ranks of the neoconservatives. On the participation of non-Jews in the movement, Kevin MacDonald intelligently observed that,

“As with the other Jewish intellectual and political movements, non-Jews have been welcomed into the movement and often given highly visible roles as the public face of the movement. This of course lessens the perception that the movement is indeed a Jewish movement, and it makes excellent psychological sense to have the spokespersons for any movement resemble the people they are trying to convince. That’s why Ahmed Chalabi (a Shiite Iraqi, a student of early neocon theorist Albert Wohlstetter, and a close personal associate of prominent neocons, including Richard Perle) was the neocons’ choice to lead postwar Iraq.” (“Understanding Jewish Influence III: Neoconservatism as a Jewish Movement,” The Occidental Quarterly)

So this is just another part of the deception. In order to sell their ideas to the gentiles whom they are trying to trick, they recruit non-Jews to promote their objectives. Jews have mastered this deceitful stratagem. Its usage can also be noticed with the advent of Bolshevism in Russia, where non-Jew Stalin served as the figurehead for the Jewish-dominated regime of the USSR. In America, Organized Jewry always select a subservient gentile frontman to serve as President of the country; that way, when things go south, the puppet non-Jew is left holding the bag, while his coterie of Jewish advisers generally avoid any serious scrutiny. The Jewish-owned press also helps to create the illusion that the President of the USA actually has control of his own ship, when in reality he is nothing more than a lowly pawn on the grand Jewish chessboard.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERAMany researchers have noted PNAC’s leading role in fomenting a war with Iraq, having aggressively advocated military action against the country in two letters to President Bill Clinton in 1998, continuing their maniacal push for war until it was finally achieved in 2003. After the election of George W. Bush in 2000, a number of PNAC’s members were appointed to key positions within the President’s administration. In a letter to President Bush dated April 3, 2002, the PNAC group revealed the Jewish-Zionist motivations underlying their treasonous agenda. Seizing the opportunity to capitalize on the 9/11 attacks, the letter — which was signed by Jewish neocon luminaries such as William Kristol, Ken Adelman, Richard Perle, Midge Decter, Robert Kagan, Joshua Muravchik, Daniel Pipes, and Norman Podhoretz — urged the president to support Israel by attacking Iraq. Here is a portion of the letter:

“In particular, we want to commend you [President Bush] for your strong stance in support of the Israeli government as it engages in the present campaign to fight terrorism. . . . Israel now needs and deserves steadfast support. This support, moreover, is essential to Israel’s continued survival … for only the United States has the power and influence to provide meaningful assistance to our besieged ally. And with the memory of the terrorist attack of September 11 still seared in our minds and hearts, we Americans ought to be especially eager to show our solidarity in word and deed with a fellow victim of terrorist violence. No one should doubt that the United States and Israel share a common enemy. . . . You have declared war on international terrorism, Mr. President. Israel is fighting the same war.

… Furthermore, Mr. President, we urge you to accelerate plans for removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq . . . . It is now common knowledge that Saddam, along with Iran, is a funder and supporter of terrorism against Israel . . . . If we do not move against Saddam Hussein and his regime, the damage our Israeli friends … have suffered until now may someday appear but a prelude to much greater horrors. Israel’s fight against terrorism is our fight. Israel’s victory is an important part of our victory. For reasons both moral and strategic, we need to stand with Israel in its fight against terrorism.” (“Letter to President Bush on Israel, Arafat and the War on Terrorism,” PNAC Official Website, April 3, 2002.)

The ghastly grip of Jewry over George W. Bush and his administration was something to behold. In order to gain an overview of this development it is imperative to reproduce a full list of Jews who served in the Bush administration during his two terms in office from 2001 to 2008. This list reveals how much control Zionist Jews had over the U.S. government when the 9/11 attacks took place, in the crucial years that followed when the cover-up was instituted, and the wars against Iraq and Afghanistan were initiated. The Jewish officials in the Bush administration included:

* Richard Perle – Foreign policy advisor, chairman of the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board;
* Edward Luttwak – Member of the National Security Study Group of the Department of Defence at the Pentagon;
* Henry Kissinger – Foreign Policy Advisor, sits on the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board under Perle;
* Kenneth Adelman – Foreign Policy Advisor, Adelman also sits on the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board under Perle;
* Robert Satloff – U.S. National Security Council Advisor;
* Marc Grossman – Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs;
* Richard Haass – Director of Policy Planning at the State Department and Ambassador at large;
* Robert Zoellick – U.S. Trade Representative, a cabinet-level position;
* James Schlesinger – Foreign Policy Advisor, sits on the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board;
* David Wurmser – Special Assistant to John Bolton, the under-secretary for arms control and international security;
* Eliot Cohen – Member of the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board;
* Steve Goldsmith – Senior Advisor to the President, and Bush’s Jewish domestic policy advisor;
* Joseph Gildenhorn – Bush Campaign’s Special Liaison to the Jewish Community;
* Samuel Bodman – Deputy Secretary of Commerce;
* Bonnie Cohen – Under Secretary of State for Management;
* Ruth Davis – Director of Foreign Service Institute, who reports to the Office of Under Secretary for Management;
* Lincoln Bloomfield – Assistant Secretary of State for Political Military Affairs
* Ken Melman – White House Political Director;
* Elliott Abrams – Director of the National Security Council’s Office for Democracy Human Rights and International Operations;
* Jeffrey Berkowitz – White House Liaison to the Jewish Community and then office of presidential scheduling, 2005-2006;
* Stuart Bernstein – Ambassador to Denmark;
* Brad Blakeman – White House Director of Scheduling;
* Josh Bolten – Chief of Staff, 2006-;
* Nancy Brinker – Ambassador to Hungary and then chief of protocol for the State Department;
* Michael Chertoff – Head of the Justice Department’s criminal division;
* Douglas Feith – Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, 2001-2005;
* Ari Fleischer – White House Press Secretary, 2001-2003;
* David Frum – Speechwriter, 2001-2002;
* Chris Gersten – Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Administration for Children and Families at HHS;
* Adam Goldman – White House Liaison to the Jewish Community, 2001-2003;
* Blake Gottesman – President’s personal aide;
* Jeremy L. Katz – White House Liaison to the Jewish Community, 2007-;
* Daniel Kurtzer – Ambassador to Israel, 2001-2005;
* Frank Lavin – Ambassador to Singapore;
* Jay Lefkowitz – Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of the Domestic Policy Council, 2001-2004;
* I. Lewis Libby – Chief of Staff to the Vice President, 2001-2005;
* Ken Mehlman – White House Political Director;
* John Miller – Director, State Department Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons;
* Michael Mukasey – Attorney General, 2007-;
* Noam Neusner – White House Liaison to the Jewish Community, 2004-2005;
* Mel Sembler – Ambassador to Italy;
* Martin Silverstein – Ambassador to Uruguay;
* Cliff Sobel – Ambassador to the Netherlands;
* Tevi Troy – White House Liaison to the Jewish Community;
* Mark D. Weinberg – Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for Public Affairs, 2003-2004;
* Ron Weiser – Ambassador to Slovakia;
* Paul Wolfowitz – Deputy Secretary of Defense, 2001-2005;
* Dov Zakheim – Undersecretary of Defense, Controller, 2001-2004;
* Jay Zeidman – White House Liaison to the Jewish Community, 2006-2007;
* Randy Scheunemann – Member of the U.S. Committee on NATO, Project on Transitional Democracies, International Republican Institute;
* Paula Dobrinansky – Under-Secretary of State for Global Affairs, 2001–2007;
* Aaron Friedberg – Deputy Assistant for National Security Affairs and Director of Policy Planning, Office of the Vice President, 2003–2005;
* Peter W. Rodman – Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security, 2001–2007

Fifty-three in total, these Jewish-Zionist partisans established a powerful foothold inside the Bush administration, many of whom purportedly hold dual Israeli-American citizenship. (Dan Eden, “Dual Citizenship — Loyal to Whom?,” View Zone) It can be said with a great degree of certitude that these fifty-three Zionist Jews represented the real ‘power behind the throne’ of the Bush administration — a true “shadow government.” Bush merely served as a figurehead, a useful gentile frontman, for the sadistic ambitions and genocidal desires of the Jewish-Zionist elite. The goal of the Jewish elite from the outset of Bush’s first term in office was war with Iraq. Paul O’Neill, the former Treasury Secretary under Bush, who was fired for constantly challenging the President’s policy decisions, revealed that eight months before 9/11 at Bush’s first ever National Security Council meeting, removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq was already being discussed and meticulously planned out. According to O’Neill, Bush asked his foreign policy advisers to “find me a way” to invade Iraq. (“Paul O’Neill Speaks Out,” CBS 60 Minutes, June 14, 2006.) Ari Shavit, an Israeli senior correspondent at Haaretz Newspaper and a member of its editorial board, brazenly admitted that the Iraq war was instigated by Zionist Jews. In an article for that newspaper, Shavit conceded that “the war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history.” (“White man’s burden,” Haaretz, Mar. 04, 2003.) He goes on to acknowledge that,

In the course of the past year, a new belief has emerged in the town: the belief in war against Iraq. That ardent faith was disseminated by a small group of 25 or 30 neoconservatives, almost all of them Jewish, almost all of them intellectuals (a partial list: Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, William Kristol, Eliot Abrams, Charles Krauthammer), people who are mutual friends and cultivate one another and are convinced that political ideas are a major driving force of history. They believe that the right political idea entails a fusion of morality and force, human rights and grit.” (Ibid.)

In 2008, the University of Chicago professor John Mersheimer gave a speech at the World Affairs Council of Oregon, in which he affirmed the admissions of Ari Shavit regarding the Jewish-Zionist push for war with Iraq:

“There’s no question that the neoconservatives, one of the core constituencies in the [Israel] lobby, were the main driving force behind the [Iraq] war. They were supported by key organizations in the lobby like AIPAC. Now that the war has gone south it’s common to hear Israel’s supporters say that the main organizations in the Lobby did not push for war. But that’s not true. This point is made clear in a May 2004 editorial that appeared in The Forward:

‘As President Bush attempted to sell the war in Iraq, America’s most important Jewish organizations rallied as one to his defense. In statement after statement community leaders stressed the need to rid the world of Saddam Hussein and his weapons of mass destruction. Concern for Israel’s safety rightfully factored in to the deliberations of the main Jewish groups.’

One sometimes hears the argument today that AIPAC took no position on the Iraq war and certainly did not advocate it. But this is not true either. First of all, this claim fails the common sense test as AIPAC usually supports what Israel wants and Israel certainly wanted the United States to invade Iraq. Second, there is hard evidence that AIPAC lobbied for the war. For example, AIPAC’s executive director Howard Core told the New York Sun in January 2003 that one of AIPAC’s successes over the past year was ‘quietly lobbying congress to approve the use of force in Iraq.’

The neoconservatives of course were the main driving force behind the war. They initiated the idea of using force to topple Saddam in two letters written to President Clinton in early 1998. Over the next five years, and especially after 9/11, they pushed relentlessly for war against Iraq. No other group or institution in the United States was seriously committed to invading Iraq over that five year period. Indeed, there was significant opposition to invading Iraq, even after 9/11, within the State Department, the intelligence community and the Uniformed Military. The neoconservatives are, by their own admission, deeply committed to Israel. In fact, many of them are connected with key organizations in the Lobby like the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.” (“Iraq, the Neocons and the Israel Lobby – John Mearsheimer,” YouTube)

Mersheimer also made the key point that it was the events of 9/11 “that created circumstances where they could help convince both President Bush and Vice President Cheney that invading Iraq was a smart idea.” (Ibid.) To sell the war in Iraq to the American people the neocons needed an excuse, a pretext. Section V of the PNAC group’s “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” report entitled “Creating Tomorrow’s Dominant Force” includes the sentence: “Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor.” That prophetic and disturbing sentence was penned in September of 2000, a full year before the September 11 attacks. 9/11 was the ‘New Pearl Harbor’ that the neocons needed to fully implement their program of invasion and conquest — without it their wet dreams of war would have never come to fruition. Immediately after the attacks, the Zionist neocons in the government and media began to make baseless accusations of Iraqi involvement in 9/11, Iraqi “ties to Al-Qaeda,” and began frantically hyping the ‘threat’ of Saddam Hussein’s alleged “Weapons of Mass Destruction” (WMDs) to the American people. Although no evidence existed connecting Iraq to 9/11 — just as no evidence exists tying Osama bin Laden or Al-Qaeda to the events of that day — many naive people bought into these lies. Although there was no evidence that Iraq had any “Weapons of Mass Destruction” — it is now admitted that there weren’t any such weapons — nor was there any conceivable way that Iraq posed any kind of military threat to the United States, the ignorant American masses believed the big lie.

The three primary architects of the war in Iraq were Richard Perle (Defense Policy Board chairman), Paul Wolfowitz (Deputy Defense Secretary) and Douglas Feith (Undersecretary of Defense for Policy) — all neocon Jews and dual citizens of the U.S. and Israel who had long-standing relationships with one another. This terrible trio were all members of PNAC, JINSA, the AEI, and had close connections with AIPAC and other U.S.-based Pro-Israel groups. Each of them also had intimate ties with Israel itself and a clear record of disloyalty to America in favor of Israel. Perle, Wolfowitz and Feith had all been investigated for passing classified documents to Israeli agents while serving in high positions in previous American administrations, primarily that of Ronald Reagan. (Stephen Green, “Serving Two Flags: Neo-Cons, Israel and the Bush Administration,” CounterPunch, Feb. 28, 2004.) Due to the overwhelming Jewish grip over the American government and judicial system, all investigations into their spying activities for Israel were eventually quashed. Despite their past malfeasance, this triad of traitors held three of the top four civilian leadership positions in the Pentagon.

ZIO-TRIO-FROM-HELLRichard Perle, who was known in Washington as “The Prince of Darkness,” was not only Pro-Israel, he was directly linked with the rogue Zionist state as a board member and director of the Israeli newspaper The Jerusalem Post and also having worked as a lobbyist for the Israeli weapons manufacturer Soltam. (Jeff Gerth, “Aide Urged Pentagon To Consider Weapons Made By Former Client,” New York Times, April 17, 1983.) He was also very tight with Israel’s Likud Party and the Israeli military. Paul Wolfowitz is no slouch when it comes to Zionist fanaticism. His father was a Zionist through and through. Like many top neocon Jews, Wolfowitz was a student and disciple of Jewish neocon ideologues Leo Strauss and Albert Wohlstetter at the University of Chicago. (Mann, Jim. Rise of the Vulcans: The History of Bush’s War Cabinet. New York: Viking, 2004, pp. 28-31.) One source inside the Bush administration has described Wolfowitz as “over-the-top crazy when it comes to Israel.” (Kathleen and Bill Christison, “Dual Loyalties: The Bush Neocons and Israel,” CounterPunch, Sept. 06, 2004.) A New York Times Magazine profile of Wolfowitz cites critics who say that “Israel exercises a powerful gravitational pull on the man” and noted that he “is friendly with Israel’s generals and diplomats and that he is something of a hero to the heavily Jewish neoconservative movement.” (Bill Keller, “The Sunshine Warrior (Paul Wolfowitz),” New York Times Magazine, Sept. 22, 2002.) As a teenager, Wolfowitz lived in Israel for a time and his older sister, Laura, is married to an Israeli. (Ibid.) As the number two man in the Pentagon under Defense Secretary and fervent neocon Donald Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz is widely viewed as the cardinal architect of the Iraq war, the “most passionate and compelling advocate” of the war within the Bush administration. (Peter J. Boyer, “The Believer: Paul Wolfowitz Defends His War,” The New Yorker, Nov. 1, 2004.)

Notably, in 1992 Wolfowitz conceived the U.S. government’s doctrine of pre-emptive warfare, dubbed the ‘Wolfowitz Doctrine.’ Later, when President Bush adopted Wolfowitz’s heinous ideas, Jewish neocon commentator Charles Krauthammer revised the phrase to the ‘Bush Doctrine.’ (Maidhc Ó Cathail, “Dear Mr. President: Letters from Israel partisans that took America to war,” The Passionate Attachment, Mar. 14, 2012.) In June of 2001, just months before the events of 9/11 would unfold, Paul Wolfowitz delivered a chilling commencement speech at West Point wherein he focused on ‘surprise attacks,’ making heavy reference to Pearl Harbor. (“Wolfowitz chilling speech,” YouTube) In an audacious act of Zionist arrogance, Wolfowitz actually acknowledged in the speech that the Pearl Harbor incident, which created circumstances that led to the United States’ entry into World War Two, was “preceded by an astonishing number of unheeded warnings and missed signals.” (Ibid.) This bizarre speech – viewed in light of the PNAC report in which Wolfowitz and his Zionist colleagues envisioned a new ‘Pearl Harbor’-type attack on the U.S. homeland that would help facilitate their militaristic and imperialist policies – is beyond surreal. As I pointed out earlier, the Jewish power elite – believing that the ‘stupid goyim’ won’t even notice – enjoy the ritual of announcing their evil plans publicly; albeit in subtle, cryptic ways. Wolfowitz certainly was rejoicing afterwards, when in February of 2002 he impudently spoke of 9/11 as “an opportunity” to accomplish his globalist aims. (Interview with Robert Collier, San Francisco Chronicle, Feb. 23, 2002.)

Douglas Feith’s feverish commitment to Zionism is certainly no less evident. In the 1930s, Feith’s father, Dalck Feith, was an active member in Betar, the youth terrorist wing of the Revisionist Zionist movement founded by Vladimir Jabotinsky in Poland. (Jim Lobe, “Loss of Feith in Douglas,” Asia Times Online, Nov. 07, 2003.) This group later morphed into the Irgun which then became the Likud Party itself after the illegal formation of Israel in 1948. Back in 1986, Feith founded the Feith & Zell law firm, based initially in Israel. (Tom Barry, “Douglas Feith: Portrait of a Neoconservative,” Anti War, Sept. 16, 2004.) Feith and his evil father have both been honored by the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) for their allegiance to Israel and the Zionist cause. In 1997, Douglas Feith and his father were the Guests of Honor at the 100th anniversary dinner of the ZOA in New York City where Dalck Feith received the organization’s special Centennial Award for his “lifetime of service to Israel and the Jewish people.” (ZOA News Release, Official Website, Oct. 13, 1997.) At the dinner, Douglas Feith received the prestigious Louis D. Brandeis Award for his loyalty to the cause of Jewish supremacy. (Ibid.) On August 18, 2010, the Zionist group “Americans for a Safe Israel” held a special memorial to the Jewish terrorist leader Vladimir Jabotinsky, where Feith was the keynote speaker. (“Yizkor for Jabotinsky: The Prophet Half-Heeded,” The Forward, Aug. 25, 2010.) Commenting on the event, Jewish writer Gal Beckerman pointed out that “Jabotinsky simply does not need a special day to be remembered, not when most of the members of the current Israeli government would classify themselves as ‘Jabotinskyites.’” (Ibid.) If these facts do not illustrate clearly enough that Feith’s loyalties lie with Israel and Zionism, the following piece of information should pacify any doubts in your mind. Journalist Jeffrey Goldberg, a Jewish-Zionist zealot himself, visited Douglas Feith’s home and reported that Feith literally has a large portrait of Theodore Herzl, the “Godfather of Zionism,” hanging on the wall of his library! (“A Little Learning: What Douglas Feith knew, and when he knew it.,” The New Yorker, May 9, 2005.)

The villainous goal of Jabotinsky and his “Revisionist Zionism” movement was to establish a ‘Greater Israel’ in which all of the land between the Nile and the Euphrates rivers would be grafted into a Jewish super-state. Of course, the indigenous non-Jewish inhabitants of these lands were to be expelled or killed — Old Testament-style. In Jabotinsky’s most famous essay, “The Iron Wall,” he expressed the belief that the Jewish state could only survive by using brutal, unrelenting military force that would crush all opposition and drive its Arab opponents into hopelessness and despair. Speaking bluntly about his own vicious ideology, Jabotinsky was open about his criminal aims, stating: “Revisionism is naïve, brutal and primitive. It is savage. You go out into the street and pick any man—a Chinaman—and ask him what he wants and he will say 100 percent of everything. That’s us. We want a Jewish Empire.” (Brenner, Lenni. Zionism in the Age of the Dictators. Lawrence Hill & Co, 1983, ch. 10) The Likud Party and its neoconservative patrons in Washington strictly adhere to Jabotinsky’s doctrine of death.

Cheney_SharonTo deflect blame from the Jewish-Neocon cabal, dishonest writers and commentators in the alternative media who are sympathetic to Jews always bring up the name of Vice President Dick Cheney and are keen to point out that he is not Jewish. Although not a Jew, Cheney was nothing more than a workhorse for Zionism — an acquiescent vassal of Jewish intrigue. Before becoming Vice President, Cheney was a member of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA) as well as the Jewish-led PNAC group. His wife, Lynne Cheney, was a member of the Jewish-led American Enterprise Institute (AEI). Cheney is the one who brought all of his Jewish neocon associates into Bush’s administration and handed them key policy-making positions. Cheney’s Chief of Staff was none other than PNAC member I. Lewis Libby, a Zionist Jew and diehard neocon. Libby is responsible for hand-picking most of Cheney’s staff from Pro-Israel think-tanks. On Libby’s relationship to Israel, an article in The Jewish Daily Forward reported that “Israeli officials liked Libby. They described him as an important contact who was accessible, genuinely interested in Israel‐related issues and very sympathetic to their cause.” (Ori Nir, “Libby Played Leading Role on Foreign Policy Decisions,” The Forward, Nov. 4, 2005.) The article also noted Libby’s extremely influential position, basically operating as the ‘brains’ behind all of Cheney’s decisions:

“With the indictment and subsequent resignation of Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff, I. Lewis Libby, the Bush administration has lost its most influential Jewish foreign-policy maker, Washington insiders say. Following the departure over the summer of top Pentagon officials Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith, no Jewish official in the administration had more power than Libby, 55. In fact, some say that his relationship with Cheney — widely viewed as America’s most influential vice president ever — was so symbiotic that Libby was even more influential than Feith and Wolfowitz. Libby’s formal title, assistant to the president, gave him a rank that was equivalent to the president’s national security advisor.

… Known for his obsessive tendency to avoid publicity, Libby does not wear his Jewishness on his sleeve. However, he is a member of Virginia’s largest Reform synagogue, Temple Rodef Shalom, which is not far from his home in the Washington suburb of McLean. . . . Libby’s fingerprints, Washington insiders said, were on most major foreign policy decisions made by the Bush administration. On Iraq and the war on terrorism, he played a leading role…” (Ibid.)

In 2005, Libby resigned after being indicted for perjury for leaking the name of an undercover CIA agent named Valerie Plame to reporters, as an act of revenge for her husband’s public criticism of the Jewish-Neocon conspiracy to start a war with Iraq on false pretenses. (Jeffrey Steinberg, “The Plame Affair: Rove and Cheney Are Guilty As Charged,” Executive Intelligence Review, July 16, 2005.) Another influential neocon Jew in the Bush White House was Ari Fleischer who held the position of White House Press Secretary, the ‘mouth of Sauron.’ Not only is he a zealous neocon and a dual citizen of Israel, Fleischer is a prominent member of the racist supremacist cult of Hasidic Jews known as ‘Chabad Lubavitch.’ It was reported that Fleischer picked up an award from “American Friends of Lubavitch” and helped “boost the group’s extensive Jewish outreach efforts on Capitol Hill.” (James Besser, “Ari Flesicher: Reform Lubavitch,” Baltimore Jewish Times, Oct. 26, 2001.) He was given the group’s “Young Leadership” award for his work as an early leader and co-president of Chabad’s Capitol Jewish Forum “which brings together lawmakers and congressional and administration staffers for Jewish events study.” (Ibid.) Fleischer also “lavished praise on the active Chabad effort that emphasizes the army of young staffers in government and political jobs.” (Ibid.) Forthrightly describing his passionate devotion to Israel, Flesicher told a Jewish audience: “It is terribly important for Israel to have throughout American political parties, strong support, in the most liberal wings of the Democratic Party and the most conservative wings of the Republican Party. This is good for Israel.” (Dallas Jewish Week, Jan. 24, 2004.) His main concern, evidently, is not what is good for the United States, but what is good for Israel.

I mentioned earlier that Bush’s primary speechwriter who coined the Talmudic ‘Axis of Evil’ catchphrase was the venomous Zionist-Neocon Jew, David Frum. Frum, opined journalist Robert Novak, was “more uncompromising in support of Israel than any other issue” and co-authored a propagandistic book with Richard Perle called An End To Evil: How To Win The War On Terror. Natan Sharansky, a high-ranking Israeli cabinet minister who heads the “Jewish Agency” and hard-line extremist Jew who once called Ariel Sharon “soft,” has been dubbed “Bush’s brain” by commentators. It has been confirmed that President Bush’s call for “worldwide democratic revolution” — deceptive neocon code-speak for global communist tyranny — was inspired by the neocon philosophy espoused by Natan Sharansky in his book “The Case For Democracy”. (Michael Collins Piper, “An Israeli Fanatic Is ‘Bush’s Brain’,” Rense, Jan. 01, 2005.) Another neocon Jew who was extremely influential in these circles was Princeton professor and infamous orientalist Bernard Lewis, the man who contrived the iniquitous ‘Clash of Civilizations’ idea.

Michael Ledeen, a Zionist Jew who has been described by the Jerusalem Post as “Washington’s neoconservative guru,” was one of the most fanatical warmongers in Washington, being a founding member of JINSA and a leading spokesperson for the AEI. Ledeen, an unscrupulous criminal, has a long and loathsome history of being involved in government corruption. As one of Ronald Reagan’s National Security advisers in the 1980s, he played a role in the infamous Iran-Contra affair as “the administration’s intermediary with Israel in the illegal-arms deal.” (James Bamford, “Iran: The Next War,” Rolling Stone, July 24, 2006.) Ledeen was the ringleader behind the ridiculous ‘Niger Forgeries scandal’ wherein neocon Jews concocted phony documents to make it appear as though Saddam Hussein had tried to purchase yellow cake uranium from the African nation of Niger. (Thomas Keyes, “Did Michael Ledeen Circulate The Niger Forgeries For Karl Rove?,” Useless-Knowledge, July 23, 2005.) This hoax was quickly exposed as a fraud, much to the embarrassment of the neocon Jews.

Despite not having an official government post, Ledeen was an influential outside adviser to Bush’s chief deputy Karl Rove and thus had direct input in the shaping of U.S. foreign policy. (Jim Lobe, “Veteran neo-con advisor moves on Iran,” Asia Times Online, June 26, 2003.) A Jew and Zionist extremist, Ledeen admitted the Machiavellian roots of his beliefs, stating: “I’m a student of Machiavelli, I wrote a book about Machiavelli, and I know the struggle against evil is gonna go on forever.” (“The War Party,” BBC) “Evil,” in the eyes of a neocon, is whatever gets in the way of the neocon ideal of Jewish world domination. Ledeen wrote an article titled “What Machiavelli (A Secret Jew?) Learned From Moses” (Jewish World Review, June 7, 1999.) in which he posits the theory that his idol, Machiavelli, could have been a secret Jew. In the piece, Ledeen revealed his deep-seated desire to commit evil deeds, stating that “[t]here are circumstances when only doing evil ensures the victory of a good cause.” “A good cause,” in the mind of a neocon, is simply what is good for the Jews. Ledeen’s latest book is called “Obama’s Betrayal of Israel,” which should tell you something about his loyalties. In his atrocious neocon manifesto entitled, “The War Against the Terror Masters,” Ledeen proudly confessed to his purposefully destructive, megalomaniacal aims, stating:

“Creative destruction is our middle name, both within our own society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law. Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity, which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace. Seeing America undo traditional societies, they fear us, for they do not wish to be undone. They cannot feel secure so long as we are there, for our very existence—our existence, not our politics—threatens their legitimacy. They must attack us in order to survive, just as we must destroy them to advance our historic mission.” (Ledeen, Michael Arthur. The War Against the Terror Masters: Why It Happened. Where We Are Now. And How We’ll Win. New York: St. Martin’s Press, pp. 212/3.)

Zionist-Butcher-SharonThe “war for Israel” thesis would not be complete without mentioning that in 1996 both Richard Perle and Douglas Feith, along with David and Meyrav Wurmser, participated in an Israeli study group called the “Study Group on a New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000”. Under the auspices of an Israeli policy think-tank known as the “Institute for Advanced Strategic & Political Studies,” this team of Zionist extremists authored a strategy paper intended as advice for incoming Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanayhu entitled, “A Clean Break: A New Strategy For Securing The Realm”. In it, they urged Netanyahu to break off the then-ongoing peace initiatives and suggested strategies for reshaping the Middle East in the Zionists’ favor. Among the group’s arguments was the idea that “removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq is an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right.” They also ferociously advocated the violent overthrow of the governments of Iran and Syria — essentially calling for the destruction of all remaining impediments to Jewish domination of the entire Middle East. Author James Bamford highlighted the significance of this paper in his book “A Pretext For War” (pp. 261-269):

“The blueprint for the new Bush policy [of aggression against Iraq] had actually been drawn up five years earlier by three of his top national security advisors. Soon to be appointed to senior administration positions, they were Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, and David Wurmser. Ironically the plan was originally intended not for Bush but for another world leader, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

At the time, the three officials were out of government and working for conservative pro-Israel think tanks. Perle and Feith had previously served in high level Pentagon positions during the presidency of Ronald Reagan. In a very unusual move, the former–and future–senior American officials were acting as a sort of American privy council to the new Israeli Prime Minister. The Perle task force to advise Netanyahu was set up by the Jerusalem based Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies, where Wurmser was working. A key part of the plan was to get the United States to pull out of peace negotiations and simply let Israel take care of the Palestinians as it saw fit. “Israel,” said the report, “can manage its own affairs. Such self-reliance will grant Israel greater freedom of action and remove a significant lever of pressure used against it in the past.”

But the centerpiece of the recommendations was the removal of Saddam Hussein as the first step in remaking the Middle East into a region friendly, instead of hostile, to Israel. Their plan “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm,” also signaled a radical departure from the peace-oriented policies of former Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, who was assassinated by a member of an extreme right-wing Israeli group.

As part of their “grand strategy” they recommended that once Iraq was conquered and Saddam Hussein overthrown, he should be replaced by a puppet leader friendly to Israel. Whoever inherits Iraq, they wrote, dominates the entire Levant strategically. Then they suggested that Syria would be the next country to be invaded. Israel can shape its strategic environment, they said.

This would be done, they recommended to Netanyahu, by re-establishing the principle of pre-emption and by rolling back its Arab neighbors. From then on, the principle would be to strike first and expand, a dangerous and provocative change in philosophy. They recommended launching a major unprovoked regional war in the Middle East, attacking Lebanon and Syria and ousting Iraq’s Saddam Hussein. Then, to gain the support of the American government and public, a phony pretext would be used as the reason for the original invasion.”

The Clean Break document and its psychopathic authors were likely influenced by an earlier Israeli strategy, conceived by Zionist zealot Oded Yinon in his paper “A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties,” published by the World Zionist Organization in 1982. Yinon’s paper outlined a wicked scheme in which the Arab states surrounding Israel would be destroyed from within by exploiting their internal religious and ethnic tensions. Yinon singled out Iraq in particular as Israel’s primary hegemonic roadblock. He methodically laid out how he wished to annihilate and then feast upon Iraq’s corpse in this way:

Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel’s targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. An Iraqi-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it is able to organize a struggle on a wide front against us. Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon. In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible. So, three (or more) states will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shiite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north.”

The neocon Jews believe that by weakening Israel’s external enemies they will thereby weaken Israel’s internal enemies, the native Palestinians, who have received support from countries like Iran, Iraq, Lebanon and Syria. In the psychotic tradition of Jabotinsky, they plan on accomplishing their vile goals by any means necessary.

All of the false and fabricated propaganda that was used by President Bush and his Jewish administration to justify a pre-emptive invasion of Iraq emerged from a shadowy group within the Pentagon called the ‘Office of Special Plans’ (OSP). Established by Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz shortly after 9/11 as a way to bypass the intelligence community, it was headed by Jewish neocon kingpin Douglas Feith. The co-director of the OSP was the neocon Jew Abram Shulsky, an apprentice of Richard Perle and disciple of neocon grandsire Leo Strauss. Reporter Jim Lobe, a critic of the neocons and the Iraq war, pointed out the absurdity of the situation:

“What would you do if you wanted to topple Saddam Hussein, but your intelligence agencies couldn’t find the evidence to justify a war? A follower of Leo Strauss may just hire the “right” kind of men to get the job done – people with the intellect, acuity, and, if necessary, the political commitment, polemical skills, and, above all, the imagination to find the evidence that career intelligence officers could not detect.” (“Leo Strauss’ Philosophy of Deception,” AlterNet, May 18, 2003.)

In 1999, Shulsky wrote an essay about his mentor Leo Strauss within which he suggests that deception is the norm in political life. (Ibid.) Shadia Drury wrote in her book “Leo Strauss and the American Right” that Strauss argued for the need of an ‘external threat’ which is used to maintain control over society. If no external threat existed, Strauss argued, “then one has to be manufactured.” How ironic that these dedicated political deceivers, ensconced in the diabolical doctrine of Strauss, are the ones who fed us the myth of the “dangers of Islamic terrorism” and the myth of Iraq’s “Weapons of Mass Destruction”. Robert Dreyfuss and Jason Vest, in their January 26, 2004, Mother Jones article “The Lie Factory,” wrote about the skullduggery of the Jewish cabal running the OSP:

“Kwiatkowski, 43, a now-retired Air Force officer who served in the Pentagon’s Near East and South Asia (NESA) unit in the year before the invasion of Iraq, observed how the Pentagon’s Iraq war-planning unit manufactured scare stories about Iraq’s weapons and ties to terrorists. “It wasn’t intelligence-it was propaganda,” she says. “They’d take a little bit of intelligence, cherry-pick it, make it sound much more exciting, usually by taking it out of context, often by juxtaposition of two pieces of information that don’t belong together.” It was by turning such bogus intelligence into talking points for U.S. officials-including ominous lines in speeches by President Bush and Vice President Cheney, along with Secretary of State Colin Powell’s testimony at the U.N. Security Council last February-that the administration pushed American public opinion into supporting an unnecessary war. [...]

As the momentum for war [in Iraq] began to build in early 2002, Paul D. Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith beefed up the intelligence unit and created an Iraq war-planning unit in the Pentagon’s Near East and South Asia Affairs section, run by Deputy Undersecretary of Defense William Luti, under the rubric Office of Special Plans, or OSP; the new unit’s director was Abram N. Shulsky. By then, David Wurmser had moved on to a post as senior adviser to Undersecretary of State John Bolton, yet another neocon, who was in charge of the State Department’s disarmament, proliferation, and WMD office and was promoting the Iraq war strategy there. Shulsky’s OSP, which incorporated the secret intelligence unit, took control, banishing veteran experts-including Joseph McMillan, James Russell, Larry Hanauer, and Marybeth McDevitt-who, despite years of service to NESA, either were shuffled off to other positions or retired. For the next year, Luti and Shulsky not only would oversee war plans but would act aggressively to shape the intelligence product received by the White House. …

According to Lt. Colonel Kwiatkowski, Luti and Shulsky ran NESA and the Office of Special Plans with brutal efficiency, purging people they disagreed with and enforcing the party line. ‘It was organized like a machine,’ she says. ‘The people working on the neocon agenda had a narrow, well-defined political agenda. They had a sense of mission.’ At NESA, Shulsky, she says, began ‘hot-desking,’ or taking an office wherever he could find one, working with Feith and Luti, before formally taking the reins of the newly created OSP. Together, she says, Luti and Shulsky turned cherry-picked pieces of uncorroborated, anti-Iraq intelligence into talking points, on issues like Iraq’s WMD and its links to Al Qaeda. Shulsky constantly updated these papers, drawing on the intelligence unit, and circulated them to Pentagon officials, including Rumsfeld, and to Vice President Cheney. ‘Of course, we never thought they’d go directly to the White House,’ she adds.

Kwiatkowski recalls one meeting in which Luti, pressed to finish a report, told the staff, “I’ve got to get this over to ‘Scooter’ right away.” She later found out that “Scooter” was none other than I. Lewis Scooter Libby, Vice President Cheney’s chief of staff. According to Kwiatkowski, Cheney had direct ties through Luti into NESA/OSP, a connection that was highly unorthodox.”

The OSP cabal conspired with Ariel Sharon’s government in Israel to promote an invasion of Iraq. Dozens of Israeli military and intelligence officials would just traipse in and out of Douglas Feith’s office in the Pentagon without going through regular check-in procedures. Journalist Julian Borger revealed that,

“The OSP was an open and largely unfiltered conduit to the White House not only for the Iraqi opposition. It also forged close ties to a parallel, ad hoc intelligence operation inside Ariel Sharon’s office in Israel specifically to bypass Mossad and provide the Bush administration with more alarmist reports on Saddam’s Iraq than Mossad was prepared to authorise. “None of the Israelis who came were cleared into the Pentagon through normal channels,” said one source familiar with the visits. Instead, they were waved in on Mr Feith’s authority without having to fill in the usual forms. The exchange of information continued a long-standing relationship Mr Feith and other Washington neo-conservatives had with Israel’s Likud party.” (“The spies who pushed for war,” The Guardian (UK), July 17, 2003.)

Jim Lobe also made note of this astonishing fact:

[Retired Lt Col Karen Kwiatkowski] recounts one incident in which she helped escort a group of half a dozen Israelis, including several generals, from the first floor reception area to Feith’s office. “We just followed them, because they knew exactly where they were going and moving fast”. When the group arrived, she noted the book which all visitors are required to sign under special regulations that took effect after the Sep. 11, 2001 attacks. “I asked his secretary, ‘Do you want these guys to sign in’? She said, ‘No, these guys don’t have to sign in’. It occurred to her, she said, that the office may have deliberately not wanted to maintain a record of the meeting.” (“Pentagon Office Home to Neo-Con Network,” Inter Press Service, Aug. 7, 2003.)

Larry Franklin, a Pentagon staffer who worked with Feith and Shulsky in the OSP, was indicted and sentenced to 12 years in jail for passing classified documents to Israel through two employees of AIPAC. (“Pentagon Analyst Gets 12 Years for Disclosing Data,” New York Times, Jan. 20, 2006.) Espionage charges were also brought against the two AIPAC staffers involved in the affair, Keith Weissman and Steve Rosen, for accepting the classified documents, but due to Jewish pressure the charges against them were not pursued. In his article “AIPAC on Trial,” sociologist James Petras noted that,

“The Franklin-AIPAC-Israeli investigation was more than a spy case. It involved the future of US-Middle East relations and more specifically whether the “neo-cons” would be able to push the US into a military confrontation with Iran. Franklin was a top Pentagon analyst on Iran, with access to all the executive branch deliberations on Iran. AIPAC lobbying and information gathering was aggressively directed toward pushing the Israeli agenda on a US-Iranian confrontation against strong opposition in the State Department, CIA, military intelligence and field commanders.”

Referring to the political appointees associated with the OSP, Jim Lobe observed that “[a]long with Feith, all of the political appointees have in common a close identification with the views of the right-wing Likud Party in Israel.” (“How neo-cons influence the Pentagon,” Asia Times Online, Aug. 8, 2003.) Specifically, he mentioned three more neocon Jews on the OSP staff: Michael Rubin, a Middle East specialist, previously with AEI; David Schenker, previously with the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP), a think-tank associated with AIPAC; and Michael Makovsky, “the younger brother of David Makovsky, a senior WINEP fellow and former executive editor of pro-Likud Jerusalem Post.” (Ibid.)

Many people have been duped by the false theory that the Iraq war was a “war for oil.” This theory is promoted mainly by anti-war leftists who refuse to acknowledge the overwhelming evidence of the “war for Israel” thesis because then they would have to concede that Jews have enough power over the American government and media to bring about wars that are not in America’s interests. To point out truths about Jewish power would contradict political correctness and thus they blame it all on the desire for oil and greed. Academics John Mersheimer and Stephen Walt laid this myth to rest in their book “The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy,” writing:

“Some Americans believe that this was a “war for oil,” but there is hardly any direct evidence to support this claim. Instead, the war was motivated in good part by a desire to make Israel more secure. According to Philip Zelikow, a member of the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (2001-2003), executive director of the 9/11 Commission, and now Counselor to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, the “real threat” from Iraq was not a threat to the United States. The “unstated threat” was the “threat against Israel,” Zelikow told a University of Virginia audience in September 2002, noting further that “the American government doesn’t want to lean too hard on it rhetorically, because it is not a popular sell.”

On August 16, 2002, eleven days before Vice President Cheney kicked off the campaign for war with a hard-line speech to the Veterans of Foreign Wars, the Washington Post reported that “Israel is urging U.S. officials not to delay a military strike against Iraq’s Saddam Hussein.” By this point, according to Sharon, strategic coordination between Israel and the U.S. had reached “unprecedented dimensions,” and Israeli intelligence officials had given Washington a variety of alarming reports about Iraq’s WMD programs. As one retired Israeli general later put it, “Israeli intelligence was a full partner to the picture presented by American and British intelligence regarding Iraq’s non- conventional capabilities.”

… At the same time, former Prime Minister Ehud Barak wrote a New York Times op-ed warning that “the greatest risk now lies in inaction.” His predecessor, Benjamin Netanyahu, published a similar piece in the Wall Street Journal entitled “The Case for Toppling Saddam.” Netanyahu declared, “Today nothing less than dismantling his regime will do,” adding that “I believe I speak for the overwhelming majority of Israelis in supporting a pre-emptive strike against Saddam’s regime.” Or as Ha’aretz reported in February 2003: ‘The [Israeli] military and political leadership yearns for war in Iraq.’”

The only point that needs to be made in regard to oil is that Israel plundered Iraq’s oil soon after the American occupation. Likud kingpin Benjamin Netanyahu told a group of British investors: “Soon you will see Iraqi oil flowing to Haifa. It is just a matter of time until the pipeline is reconstituted, and Iraqi oil will flow to the Mediterranean. It’s not a pipe dream.” (Steven Scheer, “Netanyahu Says Iraq-Israel Oil Line No Pipe-Dream,” Reuters, June 21, 2005.) Haaretz reported that “[t]he new pipeline would take oil from the Kirkuk area, where some 40 percent of Iraqi oil is produced, and transport it via Mosul, and then across Jordan to Israel.” (“U.S. checking possibility of pumping oil from northern Iraq to Haifa, via Jordan,” Haaretz, Aug. 25, 2003.) Another profiteering element of the Iraq war was exposed by Tom Barry who pointed out that Douglas Feith’s law firm, Feith & Zell, merged with the Israeli firm ‘Zell, Goldberg & Co.’ to become the ‘Fandz International Law Group’ which is responsible for bringing American companies into Iraq after the invasion and assisting them in “reconstructing” the shattered nation. (“Douglas Feith: Portrait of a Neoconservative,” Anti War, Sept. 16, 2004.) Iraqi writer Jonathan Azaziah exposed the fact that,

“it would be none other than Feith who would be put in charge of “reconstructing” Iraq. To maximize Zionist profits, Marc Zell, Feith’s partner in Fandz International Law Group, would go on to found the “Iraqi International Law Group (IILG)” with Salem “Sam” Chalabi, the nephew of none other than Ahmad Chalabi. This joint “Israeli”-Iraqi venture was the very first international law firm to open on Iraqi soil and it boastfully proclaimed on its website that, “Our clients number among the largest corporations and institutions on the planet.” Zell is an ultra-Zionist “Israeli” citizen and illegal settler that lives in the Jewish colony of Alon Shevut in the occupied West Bank. He served as a member of the Likud Party’s central committee and like Feith, is a vehement anti-Arab racist. Jewish birds of a feather indeed do flock together and in this case, the species of bird is ‘Zionist hawk.’” (“Jewish At The Root: Iraq’s Destruction, Hell Weapons, Hatred, Networking And The Interconnectedness Of It All,” Mask of Zion, April 14, 2012.)

Of course, in every war there are profiteers, and not always Jewish ones. But with respect to Iraq, nearly all of the beneficiaries and financial parasites who fleeced and robbed the country of all its resources and valuables were Jewish-Zionist criminals. (Ibid.) That is why, in 2008, Israel’s chief Ashkenazi rabbi Yona Metzger gleefully thanked President Bush for attacking Iraq. “I want to thank you for your support of Israel and in particular for waging a war against Iraq,” the ‘man of God’ told Bush in a brief verbal exchange at the Ben-Gurion airport terminal. (“Chief rabbi thanks Bush for ‘war against Iraq’,” Jerusalem Post, Jan. 10, 2008.) A lot of attention is focused on the war in Iraq, but not much is said about Afghanistan. The war in Afghanistan was launched on the false pretense that the Afghanistan-based Osama bin Laden and his Al-Qaeda group were responsible for the 9/11 attacks. Since there is no evidence that OBL, Al-Qaeda or the Taliban had anything to do with 9/11, the war in Afghanistan is an illegitimate and illegal act of naked aggression. NBC News made note of the incredible fact that the U.S. government already had detailed plans to attack Afghanistan many months before 9/11. NBC journalist Jim Miklaszewski reported:

“President Bush was expected to sign detailed plans for a worldwide war against al-Qaida two days before Sept. 11 but did not have the chance before the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, U.S. and foreign sources told NBC News. The document, a formal National Security Presidential Directive, amounted to a “game plan to remove al-Qaida from the face of the earth,” one of the sources told NBC News’ Jim Miklaszewski.The plan dealt with all aspects of a war against al-Qaida, ranging from diplomatic initiatives to military operations in Afghanistan.

… In many respects, the directive, as described to NBC News, outlined essentially the same war plan that the White House, the CIA and the Pentagon put into action after the Sept. 11 attacks. The administration most likely was able to respond so quickly to the attacks because it simply had to pull the plans “off the shelf,” Miklaszewski said. … In another striking parallel to the war plan adopted after Sept. 11, the security directive included efforts to persuade Afghanistan’s Taliban government to turn al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden over to the United States, with provisions to use military force if it refused.

… The couching of the plans as a formal security directive is significant, Miklaszewski reported, because it indicates that the United States intended a full-scale assault on al-Qaida even if the Sept. 11 attacks had not occurred.” (“U.S. sought attack on al-Qaida White House given plan days before Sept. 11,” MSNBC, May 16, 2002.)

The BBC’s George Arney confirmed that the war in Afghanistan was pre-arranged. Niaz Naik, a former Pakistani diplomat, told the BBC that “the US was planning military action against Osama Bin Laden and the Taleban even before last week’s [9/11] attacks.” According to Naik, the wider objective of the planned U.S. invasion “would be to topple the Taleban regime and install a transitional government of moderate Afghans in its place.” Naik said that the U.S. would be unlikely to drop its plans “even if Bin Laden were to be surrendered immediately by the Taleban.” (“US ‘planned attack on Taleban’,” BBC News, Sept. 18, 2001.) Months before the events of 9/11, the American government had already informed several other countries such as India, Russia, Uzbekistan, and others, that an initiative to oust the Taliban from power in Afghanistan was going to be undertaken by October of 2001 at the latest. (Ibid.)

When the strict Islamist Taliban movement came to power in Afghanistan in September of 1996, they immediately undertook a program of eradicating the opium crop, which was the country’s largest export up until that time. Opium is used to make the dangerous drug called heroin. Religious Muslims, like the Taliban, have a very negative view of drugs and alcohol, and it is considered sinful behavior to ingest these harmful substances. For this reason, they banned opium. Frederick Starr, the chairman of the Central Asia Institute at Johns Hopkins University, said that “the reduction [of opium crop in Afghanistan] is probably the most dramatic event in the history of illegal drug markets, not only in scale, but also in the fact that it was done domestically, without international assistance.” (“Taliban’s Eradication of Poppies Is Convulsing Opium Market,” New York Times, June 13, 2001.) This bold move by the Taliban to eliminate opium from their lands upset the world’s biggest drug dealers: the CIA and the Mossad. Since the American occupation of Afghanistan and the ousting of the Taliban, opium cultivation is back in full swing and the heroin drug market is stronger than ever. (“Who benefits from the Afghan Opium Trade?,” Global Research, Sept. 21, 2006.) The opium drug trade has largely been in the hands of Jewish financiers since the 1800s. The extended family of David Sassoon, a Jew of Iraqi origin who settled in Bombay, India in 1829, were the most prolific and successful opium peddlers in history, and were the principal cause of the bloody British-Chinese “opium wars” of 1839 to 1842 and 1856 to 1860. (“How the Opium War was started by the Jew!,” Wake Up From Your Slumber, Nov. 2, 2008.) Since the days of David Sassoon, not much has changed in terms of the ethnic character of the opium business. Today, Israeli and Russian-Jewish mobsters are controlling large segments of the global drug trade, working in collaboration with the Israeli and American secret services. (See: “Red Mafiya: How the Russian Mob Has Invaded America” by Robert I. Friedman)

Chris Bollyn has written extensively about 9/11 and the war in Afghanistan. In his 2001 article “The Great Game: The War for Caspian Oil and Gas,” Bollyn pointed out that the Israelis are deeply engaged in the Central Asian region and have established a strong economic foothold there. He wrote:

“Turkmenistan and Azerbijan are also both closely allied with Israeli commercial interests and Israeli military intelligence. In Turkmenistan, a former Israeli intelligence agent, Yosef A. Maiman, president of Merhav Group of Israel, is the official negotiator and policy maker responsible for developing the energy resources of Turkmenistan.

“This is the Great Game all over,” Maiman told the Wall Street Journal about his role in furthering the “geopolitical goals of both the U.S. and Israel in Central Asia. “We are doing what U.S. and Israeli policy could not achieve,” he said, “Controlling the transport route is controlling the product.”

“Those that control the oil routes out of Central Asia will impact all future direction and quantities of flow and the distribution of revenues from new production,” said energy expert James Dorian recently in Oil & Gas Journal on September 10, 2001.

Foreign business in Turkmenistan is dominated by Maiman’s Merhav Group, according to the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA). Maiman, who was made a citizen of Turkmenistan by presidential decree, serves as Turkmenistan’s official negotiator for its gas pipeline, special ambassador, and right-hand man for the authoritarian President Saparmurad Atayevich Niyazov, a former Politburo member of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.

The Merhav Group of Israel officially represents the Turkmen government and has brokered all of the energy projects in Turkmenistan, contracts worth many billions of dollars.”

On the Zionist objective in the Afghan war, Bollyn explained:

“The main Zionist goal in Afghanistan and Pakistan is to “pacify” these nations to allow the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) gas pipeline to be built. This line, once completed, could be extended to China. This project is the pipe dream of Joseph A. Maiman (a.k.a. Josef, Yosef, Yossi), one of the most powerful men in Israel. The Jerusalem Post of 23 July 2004, described Maiman as one of the leading miners of the gas of Central Asia, specifically Turkmenistan. … The “former” Israeli Mossad agent Joseph A. Maiman is reportedly the owner or co-owner of much of that gas and has been the key person managing the development of Turkmenistan’s gas fields. If the TAPI pipeline were to be completed, the Israelis connected with Maiman and Merhav would collect tens of billions of dollars by selling the gas of Turkmenistan to Pakistan, India, and China. This is certainly one of the key Israeli strategic goals in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The pipeline is meant to pass through Kandahar, the area where Canadians are serving and which Canada is obliged to defend until 2012.” (“Obama’s Deception — 9/11 and Afghanistan,” Bollyn Website, June 5, 2009.)

The occupation of Afghanistan proved very profitable indeed for the Jewish power elite and their minions in the West. Indisputably, ousting Saddam Hussein in Iraq and the Taliban in Afghanistan were on the agenda from the outset of Bush’s presidency. All that was needed was a “catalyzing event” to fast-track these imperialist endeavors. Tony Blair, the criminal British PM at the time of 9/11, made the candid admission that “there was no way we could have got the public consent to have suddenly launched a campaign on Afghanistan but for what happened on September 11.” (Michael Meacher, “This war on terrorism is bogus,” The Guardian, Sept. 06, 2003.) Besides Iraq and Afghanistan, the Jewish clique in the Pentagon had Iran and Syria in their cross-hairs from day one as well. Juan Cole described their heinous war plans in this way:

It is an echo of the one-two punch secretly planned by the pro-Likud faction in the Department of Defense. First, the United States would take out Iraq, and then Iran. David Wurmser, a key member of the group, also wanted Syria included. These pro-Likud intellectuals concluded that 9/11 would give them carte blanche to use the Pentagon as Israel’s Gurkha regiment, fighting elective wars on behalf of Tel Aviv (not wars that really needed to be fought, but wars that the Likud coalition thought it would be nice to see fought so as to increase Israel’s ability to annex land and act aggressively, especially if someone else’s boys did the dying).” (“AIPAC’s Overt and Covert Ops,” Anti War, Aug. 30, 2004.)

After Baghdad fell, the neocon Jews began to push hard for a U.S. attack on Syria. Two articles that appeared in The Forward described the driving forces behind the U.S.’s aggressive policies toward that nation. In one article from mid‐April, the author noted: “A sudden flurry of U.S. warnings to Syria in recent days indicates that Washington has undertaken what Israel and its supporters here have been urging for months: a comprehensive reassessment of Syrian ruler Bashar Assad.” (M. Perelman, “Behind Warnings to Damascus: Reassessment of Younger Assad,” Forward, April 18, 2003.) A few months later in mid‐July, the same author wrote: “During the past several months, top Israeli officials have warned their American counterparts and audiences about Assad’s unreliability. American officials have echoed the stance and press reports have speculated about possible American military intervention in Syria.” (M. Perelman, “Syria Makes Overture over Negotiations,” Forward, July 11, 2003.) It wouldn’t be until 2011 that serious action against Syria would be undertaken by these dark forces. At this time of writing, Syria is being dismantled in a brutal internal conflict wherein CIA and Mossad-sponsored mercenaries and terrorists are tearing the country apart, while the Jewish-owned media routinely fabricates war propaganda against Syria’s righteous ruler Basher al-Assad. A vindictive proxy war is being waged against the government of Assad by the familiar foes of humanity — the Zionist state and its Western surrogates. They plan to topple Assad and install an Israel-friendly stooge in his place. (Jonathan Azaziah, “Syria Under Fire: Zionist Destabilization Hits Critical Mass,” Mask of Zion, Aug. 14, 2011 / “Syria: Zionist Mobilization Kicks Into High Gear,” Mask of Zion, July 16, 2011.) Paul Craig Roberts, a former Reagan administration official, identified who is behind the charge to vaporize Syria. In an article called “The Neoconservative War Criminals In Our Midst,” Roberts said:

What the State Department needs is an office that rounds up American war criminals. They are in abundance and not hard to find. Indeed, recently 56 of them made themselves public by signing a letter to President Obama demanding that he send in the US Army to complete the destruction of Syria and its people that Washington has begun. … Among the 56 signatures are a few names from the Syrian National Congress, believed to be a CIA front, and a few names from dupes among the goyim. The rest of the signatures are those of Jewish neoconservatives tightly allied with Israel, some of whom are apparently dual-Israeli citizens who participate in the formation of US foreign policy. The names on this list comprise a concentration of evil, the goal of which is not only to bring armageddon to the Syrian people but also to the world.”

Libya, another target of Israel and the neocons for decades, was next on the chopping block. The fiendish campaign to destroy Libya began as a proxy war in early 2011, with U.S. and Israeli-backed mercenaries and insurgents being sent in to create chaos, turmoil and civil war, which later developed into a full-on bombing offensive by NATO. Led by the U.S., France and Britain, NATO pummeled Libya with bomb after bomb, mauling the entire nation and its people. The goal was to overthrow the anti-Zionist leader of Libya, Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, and install a stooge friendly to Israel and International Jewry’s vassal states in the West. (Jonathan Azaziah, “Libya: The Zionist Dragon and The Drums of War,” Mask of Zion, March 25, 2011.) To the delight of the Jewish Media, Gaddafi was assassinated in a barbaric manner by a violent mob of terrorists on the 20th of October, 2011, which the researcher Martin Iqbal has established was carried out at the behest of NATO Special Forces. (“The ‘rebel’ assassination of Muammar Gaddafi: a NATO operation from A to Z,” Empire Strikes Black, Oct. 22, 2011.) To trace the origins of the butchery that has befallen Libya, look no further than the March 28, 2011 article in the neocon rag The Weekly Standard entitled “Qadaffi Must Go”. In this piece, Jewish neocon commentator Max Boot reveals his lust for Libyan blood. The British journalist David Swanson was quite correct in his depiction of the Libyan travesty as “another neocon war.” (“Libya: another neocon war,” The Guardian, April 21, 2011.) Jonathan Azaziah made note of the fact that,

“an organization called the Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI) wrote a letter to Obama, puppet of Zion, urging an immediate full-scale military intervention to take out Qaddafi and “end the violence.” Who are the leaders of FPI, you ask? PNAC repackaged: Wolfowitz, Kristol, Abrams, Kagan, Edelman and Senor. The genocidal maniacs who designed the ravaging and pillaging of Iraq and Afghanistan. In line with FPI’s request, Zionist hawks Joe Lieberman and John McCain called Washington from Tel Aviv demanding that Obama arm the “rebels,” who were already receiving training from Western Special Ops.”

A key architect of the aggression against Libya was the French Jew Bernard-Henri Levy who persuaded France’s President Nicolas Sarkozy to support intervention there. Levy’s 2012 documentary “The Oath of Tobruk” details his carnivorous quest to bring doom upon the people of Libya. The film contains footage of Levy’s visit to Israel where he debriefed 9/11 mastermind Benjamin Netanyahu about the progress of Libya’s dismemberment and the benefits that the Zionists will reap upon Gaddafi’s defeat. French reporter Leela Jacinto acknowledged Levy’s leading role in the instigation of the war against Libya and made note of his “Jewish roots and his pro-Israeli views.” (“The Libyan War, brought to you by Bernard-Henri Levy,” France 24 News, July 6, 2012.) Nicolas Sarkozy himself is Jewish and a radical Zionist. His intense devotion to Israel’s cause was explained by a report from the influential French daily Le Figaro which unveiled that Sarkozy is a long-standing asset of the Israeli Mossad, having been recruited by the terrorist group back in the 1980s. (“Sarkozy accused of working for Israeli intelligence,” Global Research, Nov. 3, 2007.) This has earned him the nickname “Sarko the Sayan” in anti-Zionist circles. The French intelligence service, the DGSE, has for quite some time operated as a mere conduit of Israel’s Mossad, taking orders from their Zionist handlers in Tel Aviv. It’s not surprising that the French government, under such a brutal Jewish occupation, has even tried to jail peaceful activists who have called for a boycott of Israeli goods. (“In blow to Israel, French BDS activists acquitted of crime in calling for boycott,” Electronic Intifada, Dec. 18, 2011.) Since World War Two and the defeat of the Axis Powers, this once great European nation has quickly degenerated into a slaving surrogate of World Zionism.

The push for an American attack on Iran is now, as of late 2012, on the precipice. Thirsty for Iranian blood, Netanyahu and his neoconservative henchmen are flagrantly and aggressively agitating for the annihilation of Iran and the ousting of its valiant anti-Zionist leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. At a speech at the United Nations in September of 2012, Netanyahu held up a childish drawing of a cartoon bomb and claimed that this was “proof” Iran is close to acquiring atomic weaponry. (“Netanyahu’s bomb steals the show in his UN speech,” Fox News, Sept. 28, 2012.) Netanyahu’s pathetically foolish and inept sales pitch for a war with Iran was scoffed at and ridiculed even by mainstream political commentators. The man has clearly lost his marbles. All of America’s sixteen intelligence agencies unanimously agree that Iran has no nuclear weapons and is not seeking to acquire them. (“U.S. does not believe Iran is trying to build nuclear bomb,” Los Angeles Times, Feb. 23, 2012.) In spite of this, Israel and their neocon loyalists are keen on propagating the same false allegations about WMDs that they foisted upon us in 2003, during the run-up to the war in Iraq. While hissing about the so-called threat of Iran’s nuclear program, Netanyahu and the Jewish neocons always neglect to mention that Israel has hundreds of nuclear bombs, including thermo-nuclear warheads and the devices required to launch them, refusing to allow inspections of their facilities or to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which Iran has signed. (“IRAN LIE same as IRAQ LIE,” YouTube)  Bluffing with their pants down, Netanyahu and his neocon friends are looking more foolish by the day. The pure desperation of these cowardly warlords has shown itself in their flimsy rhetoric and cheap accusations.

EHUD-BARAK-911Looking at what has unfolded in the Middle East since the September 11 attacks, one is reminded of the nauseating diatribes of Ehud Barak on the BBC shortly after the collapse of the Twin Towers, wherein he called for military action against all of the countries that have since fallen victim to Zionist-led Western aggression and terrorism. Does Ehud Barak possess the supernatural gift of clairvoyance or have his devious Zionist war plans been implemented to the letter? All of these endless wars and acts of aggression against the Middle East and North Africa are part of a long-term Zionist plan – first enunciated by the very founders of the Jewish state itself in the 1950s but most vividly put into words by Oded Yinon in his 1982 paper “A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties” – to reconfigure the Middle East, making it easier for Israel to dominate, usurp and plunder the entire region. The reality of this demonic agenda was confirmed by Wesley Clark, a retired general of the U.S. Army and the former Supreme Allied Commander Europe of NATO from 1997 to 2000. Clark claims that shortly following the 9/11 attacks in 2001 a top general in the Pentagon showed him a piece of paper and said:

“I just got this memo today or yesterday from the office of the secretary of defense upstairs. It’s a, it’s a five-year plan. We’re going to take down seven countries in five years. We’re going to start with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, then Libya, Somalia, Sudan, we’re going to come back and get Iran in five years.” (“‘Seven countries in five years’,” Salon, Oct. 12, 2007.)

The Jewish-Zionist conspiracy to unleash a Straussian ‘war of civilizations’ between the West and the Islamic world has uncoiled before our very eyes. The evidence for this is so substantial, that it is a wonder why so many people refuse to recognize it. Hypnotized by the Jewish-controlled media, they cannot see the forest for the trees. Even more evidence for this collective Zionist effort to plunge the world into chaos and anarchy came on the day of 9/11 itself. At about 10:30 on the morning of the attacks, the White House received a call saying “Angel Is Next.” (“Egads! Confidential 9/11 Pager Messages Disclosed,” CBS News, Nov. 25, 2009.) ‘Angel’ was the Secret Service’s code word for Air Force One, the presidential plane that was safeguarding Bush on 9/11. (Ibid.) Here is Webster Tarpley’s take on the matter:

“Look, this is a forgotten clue of 9/11, which seems to me is the most important, because this is when the invisible government speaks. You may remember that at one point during the morning, 10:00 probably on 9/11, a death threat against Bush came into the Secret Service, saying, “Angel is next.” It essentially means, Air Force One will be shot down as the next step in these developments.

‘Angel is next’ implies the top-secret codename or codeword for the Presidential aircraft, Air Force One. I go into intelligence agency reports. . . . The Réseau Voltaire version, which came out September 20th (or) 25th, says that the ‘Angel is next’ phone call came complete with top secret codeword, across a variety of agencies, suggesting that the people that were behind the attacks were a powerful faction inside the US intelligence community and government in general.

And that secondly, they had the nuclear launch codes in their possession. This report goes on to say that the Bush team thought during most of the day, that they were the target of a military coup. And it was only somehow later in the day that the situation was recomposed. Now what would it mean?

Essentially it means that the invisible government force behind 9/11 tells Bush that he must respond by stating that its Bin Laden, Al Qaeda, the Arabs, the Islamic world, and that what’s gonna happen is the invasion of Afghanistan, and above all the beginning of the ‘war of civilizations’ that Samuel Huntington writes about. An open-ended aggression of the United States against the Arab and Islamic world.” (“Angel is next- a clue 911 was a set up by a faction in the government,” Democratic Underground, April 14, 2006.)

As a result of his adherence to political correctness, or perhaps his servitude to Jewish interests, Tarpley refuses to correctly identify the individuals who comprise what he vaguely calls the “rogue network.” This “invisible government force” that he speaks of was the Jewish-Neocon nexus embedded in the White House and the Pentagon, working with the Israeli Mossad. It is only Israel, with its vast network of spies in the United States, including inside the government, that could have acquired these top secret codes with which to threaten and blackmail the President. It is the intrigues of the Mossad-controlled firm Ptech, with its backdoor software installed on the most sensitive U.S. government computer systems, including those of the military, that could have made this happen. Look no further than Mossad’s computer guru Amit Yoran, the czar of cyber-security at the Pentagon, and the Zionist operative Michael Goff of Ptech. It was a contingent of Jewish conspirators who issued this dire threat against President Bush as a way of blackmailing him into acquiescing to their agenda of world war. Ironically, it was Osama bin Laden himself who correctly perceived that “the leaders in America and in other countries as well have fallen victim to Jewish Zionist blackmail.” (Chris Bollyn, “What Does Bin Laden Really Want?,” American Free Press, Oct. 11, 2001.) In his unheard protestations of innocence shortly after the attacks, bin Laden was not hesitant to clarify who runs the shadow “government within the government” of the United States, stating:

“… Is it not that there exists a government within the government in the United States? That secret government must be asked as to who made the [9/11] attacks. … This [American] system is totally in [the] control of the American Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States.” (Ummat, Sept. 28, 2001.)

As soon as 9/11 occurred Barak, Sharon, Netanyahu, Perle, Wolfowitz and other Jewish kingpins unleashed a collective rallying cry for a third world war. Efraim Halevy, Mossad’s chief on 9/11 who spent 40 years with the terror agency, disseminated the same message of world war. In June of 2002, Halevy informed a closed meeting of the NATO Alliance Council in Brussels that the September 11 attacks had been “an official and biting declaration of World War III,” emphasizing that there should be no distinction between the various Arab and Muslim resistance groups that Israel considers enemies – they should be treated as one entity and targeted for extinction. In a stunningly arrogant display of psychological projection, Halevy proclaimed:

“The 11th of September was, if you will, an official and biting declaration of World War III. … Only on September 11, was the die cast, and the true character of the new war was revealed to the eyes of all. This is a war in which the sides are not only countries but also terrorist groups, that operate almost with impunity. It is a war which does not have clear fighting lines; it is a war that is being waged against free societies, with weapons and strategies we have not known until now. It is a war which does not adhere to the rules of war, or the international legal norms.” (Yidiot Aharonot, June 28, 2002.)

EFRAIM-HALEVYIn a revealing televised interview with the Canadian news program The Standard, Halevy was put on the spot and asked whether there was any merit to the suspicions of many people that the Mossad was behind the 9/11 attacks. Amazingly, Halevy admitted openly that Israel and Zionist Jews were the greatest beneficiaries of the attack, but lamely denied that they were behind the operation by simply chastising the allegations of Israeli involvement as “a very vicious libel.” Here is a portion of the exchange:

Peter Klein (Interviewer): That reputation could also backfire can’t it? After 9/11, for instance, there were conspiracies all over, certainly within the Arab world but even beyond that, that Mossad was the only one who had the power and the strength and the organizational skills to pull off something that spectacular — somehow Israel was behind that for political gain. Do you feel that’s the dark side of the reputation of Mossad?

Efraim Halevy: Well, like everything in life, there’s a downside to the mystique as well. On 9/11, I was head of the Mossad. And within hours of the event becoming public there were rumors flying around the Middle East that this was a Mossad operation because, after all, one of the immediate results of the 9/11 was clearly a very very severe backlash of international approbation of Islam in general. Islam had a very bad day. The Saudis had a very bad day. Muslim countries had a very bad day, including moderate countries. So who benefits from it? And as you know in a crime the immediate question is asked: “Who benefits? Who benefits from something?” Obviously Israel benefited, the Jewish people benefited. So it was the Mossad. This of course was a very vicious libel, it was a clear lie. . . . But yes, in situations like this obviously it is easy to pin things on the Mossad. (“Efraim Halevy interviewed by Peter Klein on The Standard – Part 1,” YouTube)

The significance of Halevy’s stunning admission — that 9/11 was a blessing of good fortune for Israel and the Jewish people — cannot be taken lightly. Next to Benjamin Netanyahu and Ehud Barak, Halevy is a prime suspect as a cardinal mastermind of 9/11 and has stated on record that Israel benefited exponentially from this disaster. As head of Mossad at the time the attacks took place, he must have been heavily involved in overseeing the operation, guiding the Israeli agents who carried out this act of mass murder. Working in collaboration with the Jewish-Neocon clique inside the White House and the Pentagon, Halevy and his murderous Mossad henchmen are riddled with guilt and must be held accountable for their sickening crimes.

As the evidence presented here undeniably shows, the neoconservatives in Washington are Israeli empire builders, not American ones. They worked in lock-step with the Israeli government led by Ariel Sharon and share the ideology of the Jabotinskyites who run that evil regime. When it is all said and done, anyone with the capacity to read cannot escape the conclusion that neoconservatism is a Jewish movement fueled by Jewish motivations and for Jewish gain. The hellish wars against Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and the push for imperialist incursions into Syria, Iran, Sudan and other countries, are Jewish wars fueled by Jewish motivations for Jewish gain.

Many authors have written lengthy books which corroborate this thesis. Dr. Stephen Sniegoski cogently documented this inescapable truth in his book “The Transparent Cabal: The Neoconservative Agenda, War in the Middle East, and the National Interest of Israel”. Likewise, Michael Collins Piper confirmed this reality in his informative text “The High Priests of War”. Even Jewish writers such as Murray Rothstein, author of “The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and the Shaping of Public Policy”, and Yuri Slezkine, author of “The Jewish Century”, admit this fact. These writers make quick work of the fools and shills who seek to hide and bury these forbidden truths underneath an edifice of lies and deceit.

© 2013 Zander C. Fuerza

Download the complete book HERE

Posted in Masters of Deception Book | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Masters of Deception: Chapter Seven

MASTERS OF DECEPTION COVER 1CHAPTER SEVEN

The Myth of Osama bin Laden & the Nineteen Arab Oswalds

What evidence exists that nineteen Islamic fanatics directed by a man in a cave thousands of miles away were involved in 9/11? None. Nada. Zero. Not a shred. When pressed on the issue, the FBI quietly confessed that they have no evidence linking Osama bin Laden with 9/11. (Ed Haas, “The FBI admits: No Hard Evidence Connecting Bin Laden to 9/11,” Muckraker Report, July 25, 2009.) Shortly after 9/11, the Taliban offered to hand bin Laden over to the U.S. if the Bush administration would simply provide them with sufficient proof of his guilt. Bush and his cronies scoffed at the offer and continued dropping bombs on Afghanistan. (“Bush rejects Taliban offer to hand Bin Laden over,” The Guardian, Oct. 14 2001.)

If, as I contend, 9/11 was an Israeli plot, then who were these 19 men whose pictures and identities were flashed all over our TV screens within a few days of the attacks? (“FBI list of individuals identified as suspected hijackers,” CNN, Sept. 14, 2001.) Patsies. Dupes. Fall guys for the Mossad. The Mossad’s motto is: “By way of deception thou shalt do war.” It is the Mossad’s specialty to frame Arabs and Muslims for acts of terror that they commit themselves, just as it is generally the Jewish specialty to frame non-Jews for their own misdeeds and to fabricate the extent of non-Jewish persecution of Jews. As we learned earlier in this text, on 9/11 the Mossad tried to trick the NYPD into thinking Palestinians were going to bomb the Holland tunnel when in reality two Israelis attempted to explode a truck bomb on the George Washington Bridge. We also witnessed the Jewish-owned news media promulgate a fraudulent video clip purporting to show Palestinians celebrating the 9/11 attacks in the West Bank, when five Israelis were actually celebrating the attacks in New Jersey, right across the Hudson river! The brazen pattern of criminal Jewish manipulation of this event does not stop there.

The nineteen 9/11 “hijackers” have proved to be phantoms and dupes set up to take the blame for a crime they did not commit. (David Ray Griffin, “Was America Attacked by Muslims on 9/11?”) This is a standard component of a false-flag operation — Lee Harvey Oswald served this function in the JFK assassination conspiracy. How could these 19 men have been working for “Al-Qaeda” when that organization doesn’t even exist? (“BBC now admits al qaeda never existed,” YouTube) The term ‘Al-Qaeda’ has several translations, one of which is ‘the toilet’ and the other is ‘the base’. It is actually just a reference to the database of Arab and Islamic fighters and mercenaries financed, armed, trained and used by the CIA, the Saudis, the Pakistani ISI and the Mossad to wage an insurgency against the Soviets in the Afghan-Soviet war, which lasted nine years from December 1979 to February 1989. (Pierre-Henri Bunel, “Al Qaeda: The Database,” Global Research, May 12, 2011.) Osama bin Laden was the CIA’s/Mossad’s point man in Afghanistan in the 1980s, leading a segment of the Islamic Mujaheddin fighters against the Soviet occupiers. The CIA called this endeavor “operation cyclone,” the second largest covert operation in its history. In his book “The Other Side of Deception,” former Mossad officer Victor Ostrovsky acknowledged that this operation was under the direct supervision of Mossad. Bin Laden’s CIA/Mossad handlers would later turn him into a convenient scapegoat and scarecrow for international terrorism when it suited their purposes.

A large portion of the American government’s case against ‘Al-Qaeda’ rests on a series of amusingly implausible scenarios and highly dubious “discoveries” by U.S. “investigators.” One major claim of the official conspiracy theory that defies all possible logic, and even contradicts basic laws of physics, is the story that several of the alleged Muslim hijackers’ passports, and other flimsy items supposedly belonging to them, miraculously managed to survive the violently explosive plane crashes, conveniently falling into the hands of American government officials and used to “prove” their sham version of events.

MIRACLE-PASSPORTAccording to the New York police commissioner Bernard Kerik, in what can only be described as the most asinine assertion of all time, the passport of Satam Al Suqami (who is claimed to have been one of the hijackers on Flight 11) miraculously survived the crash into the North Tower of the WTC and the subsequent fireball explosion, escaping the cabin of the plane, falling hundreds of feet to the ground, and was then picked up by some random passerby a few blocks away who turned it in to the NYPD. (“New arrest warrants issued in terrorism probe,” CNN, Sept. 17, 2001.) The passport appeared to be in pristine condition — remarkably unburned with no visible damage! It is extremely important to note that on August 26, 2001, NYPD chief Bernard Kerik made a four day trip to Israel to discuss “terrorism” related issues with Israeli security officials. (“Kerik Plans Mission To Israel,” NY Daily News, Aug 26, 2001.) In 2007, Kerik was indicted on 16 counts including fraud and conspiracy as well as taking and failing to report a $250,000 loan from billionaire Israeli tycoon Eitan Wertheimer, who spent time with Kerik on his trip to Israel in August of 2001. (“Kerik Loan Activity Is Brought to Light After Indictment,” New York Times, Nov. 24, 2007.) A Jewish marble and stone merchant from Brooklyn named Shimon Cohen was the intermediary for the loan transaction. Interestingly, the Wertheimer family’s vast holdings include companies that have contracts with the United States Department of Defense. (Ibid.) It is more than likely that this Jewish loan shark, Eitan Wertheimer, was Kerik’s handler and his trip to Israel shortly before 9/11 was where he received his instructions.

The official narrative gets even more ridiculous. According to the official story, Flight 93 is said to have crashed in a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, after the passengers stormed the ‘Al-Qaeda’ hijackers in the cockpit, bringing the plane down in an act of heroism. Many researchers have pointed out the complete lack of any recognizable debris in and around the cartoon cut-out impact crater that was present in that field in Shanksville, which is said to have been caused by the plane crash. The official propagandists have attempted to explain away this discrepancy like this:

United Airlines Flight 93 slammed into the earth Sept. 11 near Shanksville, Somerset County, at more than 500 mph, with a ferocity that disintegrated metal, bone and flesh. It took more than three months to identify the remains of the 40 passengers and crew, and, by process of elimination, the four hijackers.”(Pittsburgh Post Gazette, Dec. 30, 2001.)

Other defenders of the official story have postulated that Flight 93 crashed so horribly that the entirety of it was buried dozens of feet underground, leaving absolutely no visible debris on the surface. These explanations are simply not believable and are quite preposterous. Every other major plane crash site in history left a highly visible trail of wreckage. The Flight 93 debris field covered between five and eight square miles, which is more consistent with a mid-air explosion or a shoot-down rather than an ordinary crash. (“Flight 93 Crash Site,” 911 Research WTC-7 Website) Moreover, satellite images of the same field where Flight 93 is alleged to have crashed taken by the U.S.G.S. (United States Geological Survey) in 1994 undeniably proves that the crater which authorities claim was caused by the impact of Flight 93 was already present in that field for years before 9/11 happened — although it appears to have been slightly modified for 9/11. (Chris Bollyn, “The Shanksville Deception of 9-11,” Bollyn Website, Feb. 4, 2010.)

FLIGHT-93-CRASH-ITEMSWhat totally undermines these feeble attempts at writing off the lack of plane debris in and around that phony crater is that the FBI also claims to have recovered from the wreckage of Flight 93 the passport of alleged hijacker Ziad Jarrah, the passport of alleged hijacker Saeed Al Ghamdi, an Islamic “martyrdom note,” as well as a red bandana, which authorities claim the hijackers were wearing. Three of the items were not burned or damaged in any way, and luckily most of the face is visible on the indestructible passport of Ziad Jarrah. (See picture) So we are being asked to believe that three paper documents and a piece of cloth material magically survived the same impact that steel-titanium jet engines could not. These items are an obvious fabrication of the government to prop up the “Arab hijackers” fable.

This fairy tale actually gets better. The official story says that Mohammed Atta was the ringleader of the 9/11 attackers and precision piloted Flight 11 into the North Tower of the WTC. The official story also ludicrously asserts that Atta brought luggage with him on his suicide flight containing these items: a Boeing 757 training video, a flight data recorder, a Quran, a switch blade, pepper spray, and a written letter containing his last will with instructions to the other ‘Muslim hijackers,’ including their names. What’s more incredible is that Atta’s luggage, the official story attests, did not get loaded onto the plane and fell right into the hands of the FBI! (“Koran and plane video found in flight bag,” The Telegraph, Sept. 12, 2001.) Indeed, a former FBI agent says that Atta’s bag, and the bizarrely incriminating items found within it, literally “made their case” against ‘Al-Qaeda’:

“A former FBI agent and a former federal prosecutor who helped direct the New England investigation of the Sept. 11 attacks told Newsday that one bag found in Boston contained far more than what the commission report cited, including the names of the hijackers, their assignments and their al-Qaida connections.

“It had all these Arab-language papers that amounted to the Rosetta stone of the investigation,” former FBI agent Warren Flagg said. The former federal prosecutor, who declined to be identified publicly, supported Flagg’s account.

“How do you think the government was able to identify all 19 hijackers almost immediately after the attacks?” Flagg asked. ‘They were identified through those papers in the luggage. And that’s how it was known so soon that al-Qaida was behind the hijackings.’” (Michael Dorman, “An untold story of 9/11,” Newsday, April 17, 2006.)

Sounding like a script of a bad Hollywood action film, these nonsensical claims raise a few logical questions. Firstly, why would these ‘Muslim hijackers’ bring passports on domestic flights when they are not needed? Secondly, why would Atta pack luggage for a suicide mission where it is just going to get destroyed in the crash anyway? More importantly, why fill this bag with a plethora of highly incriminating material that would surely get one detained at the security check-in, needlessly jeopardizing the entire mission!? And these people are supposed to have been geniuses who outsmarted the most sophisticated military-defense system in the history of the world!? When you take a close look at the alleged hijackers and the circumstances surrounding their movements and activities in the United States prior to the attacks, this fable begins to fall apart at the seams. There is no shortage of illogical fallacies which shatter the myth of the 19 Arab Oswalds. If you are not already convinced that the official story concerning 9/11’s “Muslim hijackers” is a bogus fairy tale, then you will be soon enough.

The official story also contends that the day before 9/11 Mohammed Atta and Abdul Alomari drove to Portland, Maine, stayed overnight, and then caught a connecting flight back to Boston the next morning, allegedly boarding and then hijacking Flight 11 at Boston’s Logan Airport. What would be the point of this unnecessary and needlessly risky trip to Portland? The only known airport security video in which Atta appears to be boarding a flight is from Portland, not Boston. (“Mohamed Atta: Terrorist, Patsy, or Scapegoat?,” What Really Happened) These brilliant ‘terrorists’ obligingly left numerous clues behind to incriminate themselves, such as Arabic language flight training manuals that are said to have been discovered in a rented white Mitsubishi Mirage found at Boston’s Logan Airport on the evening of 9/11. (Naftali Bendavid, “Officials scour U.S. for clues,” The Baltimore Sun, Sept. 13, 2001.) Agents allegedly found a 1989 Pontiac Grand Prix at Logan Airport in Boston as well, which purportedly belonged to Atta. (Ibid.) How can this be if Atta drove to Portland with Alomari the night before 9/11 and took a connecting flight back to Boston in the morning? That would require two cars. Why would Atta leave a car containing incriminating evidence at Boston’s Logan Airport, rent a second car in Boston to drive to Portland, and then fly back to Boston again? The incompetent authors of this farcical script obviously did not think things through. They were counting on the ignorance of the American public when they conceived this hoax knowing that most people are too lazy and apathetic to think critically about these things or even take the time to analyze these critical details.

The abandoned rental cars containing Arabic flight manuals, Atta’s magical luggage and the indestructible passports of several of these 9/11 patsies, are obvious concoctions of the Mossad and its Zionist helpers in the FBI. All of these illogical oddities, irrational absurdities and fictitious fabrications unveil an incompetent storyline authored by beguiling Zionist scriptwriters. We have also been led to believe that these alleged hijackers were devout Muslims motivated by an extreme interpretation of their religion. However, the activities of these individuals in the year leading up to 9/11 contradict that assertion. The San Francisco Chronicle reported that Atta and other alleged hijackers had made at least six trips to Las Vegas where they had “engaged in some decidedly un-Islamic sampling of prohibited pleasures,” including heavy drinking, cavorting with lap dancers, and bringing call girls to their rooms. (Kevin Fagan, “Agents of terror leave their mark on Sin City,” San Francisco Chronicle, Oct. 4 2001.) The night before 9/11, three men were witnessed in a bar making loud anti-American statements and spoke of impending bloodshed, according to John Kap, the manager of the Pink Pony and Red Eyed Jack’s Sports Bar in Daytona Beach. The unidentified men conveniently left a Holy Quran behind at the bar! (“Manager: Men spewed anti-American sentiments,” USA Today, Sept. 14, 2001.)

The real Mohammed Atta was indeed a very religious man. This was confirmed by Dittmar Machule, Mohammed Atta’s thesis advisor in Hamburg, who described him as “a very nice young man: polite, very religious and with a highly developed critical faculty.” (Joel Achenbach, “‘You Never Imagine’ A Hijacker Next Door,” The Washington Post, Sept. 16 2001.) This description of him is vastly at odds with the personality of the “Mohammed Atta” living and going to flight school in Florida, according to the testimony of his former girlfriend Amanda Keller, an American stripper and lingerie model. According to Keller’s testimony, the Florida Atta “loved to party… He was out with Keller nearly every night they were together… He was a heavy drinker, snorted coke, was a stylish dresser and wore expensive jewelry.” (“Mohamed Atta loved pork chops, and 49 other things you may not know,” Democratic Underground, April 18, 2004.) Keller also said that Atta, or the person claiming to be him, loved porkchops, spoke fluent Hebrew and associated with people connected to the Mafia. Moreover, six nights before the attack, at a bar called Shuckums in Ft Lauderdale, Atta and two companions got “wasted” and then Atta blasphemed, yelling “Fuck God” out loud, according to Tony Amos and bartender Patricia Idrissi. All of this is documented in a book called “Welcome to Terrorland” by Daniel Hopsicker. The outrageous activities of these “devout Muslims” are not consistent with religious fanatics about to perform a martyrdom operation but are consistent with Israeli imposters mixing business with pleasure. Sophisticated terrorists certainly wouldn’t leave a mile-wide trail of evidence behind them for the FBI to follow, almost as if they wanted to get caught. On the other hand, Israeli Mossad assets trying to establish a ‘legend’, a back-story, which could then be played up by the Jewish-owned media to implicate Muslims for 9/11, certainly would have engaged in this type of attention-seeking behavior to fulfill their ‘role’ impersonating the 19 Arab Oswalds.

Within a few weeks of the attack reports surfaced showing that several of the named 9/11 terrorists were actually alive and well in the Middle East, apparent victims of identity theft! (“Hijack ‘suspects’ alive and well,” BBC News, Sept. 23, 2001 / “At Least 7 of the 9/11 Hijackers are Still Alive,” What Really Happened) Among those found alive were: Abdul Aziz al-Omari, Salem al-Hamzi, Saeed al-Ghamdi, Ahmed al-Nami, Wail al-Shehri, Waleed M. al-Shehri, and Mohand al-Shehri. (“MANY 9-11 “HIJACKERS” ARE STILL ALIVE.,” Guardian 150m Website) Abdul Aziz al-Omari told reporters he was an engineer who had no clue how to fly a plane and that “his passport was stolen when his apartment in Denver, Colorado, was burgled in 1995.” (David Harrison, “Revealed: the men with stolen identities,” UK Telegraph, Sept. 23, 2001.) The picture used on the FBI suspects’ list for Abdul Aziz al-Omari was that of another person, also alive, named Abdul Rahman al-Omari, a Saudi Airlines pilot who went to the U.S. embassy in Jeddah demanding to know why he was being declared a dead terrorist. (Robert Fisk, “‘Suicide hijacker’ is an airline pilot alive and well in Jeddah,” The Independent, Sept. 17, 2001.) In 1999, while living in Germany, Mohammed Atta and two of his alleged accomplices reported their passports had been stolen. (“Investigating Terror People: Mohammad Atta,” BBC News) Ziad Jarrah, who is alleged to have been the lead hijacker on Flight 93, was not religiously or politically inclined, according to his Lebanese family and his German flight school roommate Thorsten Biermann. In a stunning revelation, the New York Times reported that Ziad Jarrah’s Lebanese Muslim cousin, Ali al-Jarrah, was a paid spy for Israel, serving the Mossad for more than two decades! Under the cover of a supporter of the Palestinian cause, Ali al-Jarrah was conducting spying operations for Israel against Palestinian groups and the Lebanese resistance movement Hezbollah. (Robert F. Worth, “Lebanese in Shock Over Arrest of an Accused Spy,” New York Times, Feb. 18, 2009.) Commenting on this intriguing discovery, journalist Michael Collins Piper opined:

The gratuitous Times suggestion that the two cousins “do not appear to have known each other well” is intriguing, inasmuch as it is an admission that they did, in fact, know one another. And that could be very telling, for there are those who are now suggesting that the older cousin may indeed have recruited his younger cousin as an asset for Israeli intelligence.” (“Mossad Link Found to One of Key 9-11 Hijackers,” American Free Press, March 2009.)

In February of 2000, Jarrah lost his passport while waiting for a visa to go to the U.S. Furthermore, it has been established that the photograph which appears on Ziad Jarrah’s passport that was allegedly recovered from the wreckage of Flight 93 is not the real Jarrah. (“Photographic Evidence Showing Ziad Jarrah Was Not a 9/11 Hijacker,” What Really Happened) In an investigative article titled “The Two Jarrahs,” which can be viewed on the ‘From The Wilderness’ website, Paul Thompson conclusively demonstrates that there were two “Ziad Jarrahs”. While many of the details are sketchy, Thompson shows that there was another person named Ziah Jarrah living in the United States prior to the Lebanese Jarrah ever arriving in the country. In 1995, writes Thompson, “a person named Ziad Jarrah rented an apartment in a three-family house on East Third Street in Brooklyn, New York. … Landlords there identified his photograph as being the same as that of the 9/11 hijacker.” The Jarrah accused of participating in 9/11 didn’t arrive in the U.S. until June of 2000. Confirmation of the existence of this second, identical-looking Jarrah came on January 30, 2001, when a man named Ziad Jarrah was questioned for several hours at the Dubai International Airport in the United Arab Emirates at the behest of the CIA, who suspected he was involved in terrorist activities. During questioning, this Jarrah acknowledged having spent the previous two months in Pakistan and Afghanistan. (“September 11 hijacker questioned in January 2001,” CNN, Aug. 1, 2002.) The problem with this story is that the real Ziad Jarrah was somewhere else at the time, a Florida Flight Training facility where he had been studying for the previous six months. Paul Thompson observed that,

“These two examples are just the most glaring clues of many that someone was posing as Ziad Jarrah for years. The story of Jarrah in New York in 1995 is truly amazing, because that would have happened presumably before the 9/11 plot was even conceived, and before Mohamed Atta or most of the other 9/11 terrorists even joined al-Qaeda. Additionally, it was before Jarrah had moved to Germany so he couldn’t possibly have had come into contact with any al-Qaeda operatives yet. Yet, not only is there another Ziad Jarrah, but two looked similar enough for people in Brooklyn to confuse the two.”

A plausible conclusion that can be drawn from this information is that the Ziad Jarrah who was accused of hijacking United Airlines Flight 93 was framed by a Doppelgänger with a similar appearance. Mossad is known for such elaborate schemes. Ziad Jarrah was not the only one that was the victim of a frame-up. Initially a sloppy attempt was made to frame two Arab brothers, Adnan and Ameer Bukhari. Their names were tied to a silver-blue Nissan Ultima found in Portland, Maine. Investigators initially listed the brothers as hijackers who boarded Flight 11. Authorities even said that Adnan’s name appeared on the passenger manifest of Flight 11. (“Saudi flight engineer no longer part of investigation,” Associated Press, Sept. 14, 2001.) The information found in the rental car led authorities to a house in Vero Beach, Florida, that had allegedly been rented by these two brothers. Inside it were two pilot’s certificates in the names of Adnan Bukhari and his brother, Ameer Abbas Bukhari. (“Evidence trails lead to Florida,” BBC News, Sept. 13, 2001.) This ridiculous sham completely fell apart when it surfaced that Adnan Bukhari was still alive and his brother Ameer had died in a small plane crash a year earlier! (“Feds think they’ve identified some hijackers,” CNN, Sept. 13, 2001.) In 2002, British intelligence reported that the so-called Al-Qaeda cells blamed for the 9/11 attacks had been controlled and directed by Israeli Mossad agents posing as Islamic radicals. This revelation was uncovered by Wayne Madsen who wrote:

“British intelligence reported in February 2002 that the Israeli Mossad ran the Arab hijacker cells that were later blamed by the U.S. government’s 9/11 Commission for carrying out the aerial attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon. WMR has received details of the British intelligence report which was suppressed by the government of then-Prime Minister Tony Blair.

A Mossad unit consisting of six Egyptian and Yemeni-born Jews infiltrated “Al Qaeda” cells in Hamburg (the Atta-Mamoun Darkanzali cell), south Florida, and Sharjah in the United Arab Emirates in the months before 9/11. The Mossad not only infiltrated cells but began to run them and give them specific orders that would eventually culminate in their being on board four regularly-scheduled flights originating in Boston, Washington Dulles, and Newark, New Jersey on 9/11.

The Mossad infiltration team comprised six Israelis, comprising two cells of three agents, who all received special training at a Mossad base in the Negev Desert in their future control and handling of the “Al Qaeda” cells. One Mossad cell traveled to Amsterdam where they submitted to the operational control of the Mossad’s Europe Station, which operates from the El Al complex at Schiphol International Airport. The three-man Mossad unit then traveled to Hamburg where it made contact with Mohammed Atta, who believed they were sent by Osama Bin Laden. In fact, they were sent by Ephraim Halevy, the chief of Mossad.

The two Mossad teams sent regular coded reports on the progress of the 9/11 operation to Tel Aviv via the Israeli embassy in Washington, DC. WMR has learned from a Pentagon source that leading Americans tied to the media effort to pin 9/11 on Arab hijackers, Osama Bin Laden, and the Taliban were present in the Israeli embassy on September 10, 2001, to coordinate their media blitz for the subsequent days and weeks following the attacks. It is more than likely that FBI counter-intelligence agents who conduct surveillance of the Israeli embassy have proof on the presence of the Americans present at the embassy on September 10. Some of the Americans are well-known to U.S. cable news television audiences.

In mid-August, the Mossad team running the Hamburg cell in Boston reported to Tel Aviv that the final plans for 9/11 were set. The Florida-based Mossad cell reported that the documented “presence” of the Arab cell members at Florida flight schools had been established. [...]

WMR previously reported that the Mossad cell operating in the Jersey City-Weehawken area of New Jersey through Urban Moving Systems was suspected by some in the FBI and CIA of being involved in moving explosives into the World Trade Center as well as staging “false flag” demonstrations at least two locations in north Jersey: Liberty State Park and an apartment complex in Jersey City as the first plane hit the World Trade Center’s North Tower. One team of Urban Moving Systems Mossad agents was arrested later on September 11 and jailed for five months at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. Some of their names turned up in a joint CIA-FBI database as known Mossad agents, along with the owner of Urban Moving Systems, Dominik Suter, whose name also appeared on a “Law Enforcement Sensitive” FBI 9/11 suspects list, along with the names of key “hijackers,” including Mohammed Atta and Hani Hanjour, as well as the so-called “20th hijacker,” Zacarias Moussaoui.” (“British Intelligence Reports Mossad Ran 9/11 “Arab” Hijacker Terrorist Operation,” Wayne Madsen Report, Jan. 27, 2011.)

Madsen’s report dovetails nicely with two other important facts. The hundreds of detained Israeli spies fronting as “art students” had been following and living “within hundreds of yards” of the Arab patsies who were later blamed for 9/11. Keith Phucas, writing for The Times Herald, reported:

“A memorandum sent to the 9/11 Commission, and Senate and House intelligence committees in September 2004, suggests that young Israelis who canvassed dozens of U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) offices in 2000 and 2001 trying to sell paintings to federal workers, may have been spying not only on the DEA, but also on Arab extremists in the United States – including the Sept. 11 hijackers who were living in Florida and New Jersey. The Israeli “art student” story, which first surfaced in 2001 in news reports, has yet to be explained by U.S. authorities. Curiously, the 9/11 Commission did not venture to connect the myriad of dots to solve the mystery. [...]

In 2001, a Fox News report by Carl Cameron laid out the Israeli spy scenario, however, the story was short-lived, and Shea was told by a representative at the news organization that there was outside pressure to kill the story. Several publications, including The Forward, Insight and the French newspaper, Le Monde, picked up the story in 2002. All indicated there was extreme reluctance by U.S. officials – and practically anyone else – to discuss the matter publicly. [...]

One of the memorandum’s most fascinating revelations puts the Israelis and would-be 9/11 hijackers in close proximity geographically in the months prior to the terrorist attacks in Florida, Oklahoma and New Jersey. As the DEA was compiling its report in June 2001, 15 or the 19 plotters of the Sept. 11 attacks were living in the Hollywood, Fla., area, according to Shea’s research, and more than 30 of the young Israelis also lived in the same area during this time period.

According to the memorandum, some of the Israelis and hijackers in Florida lived “within hundreds of yards” of each other. Besides Hollywood, the Israelis and hijacker lived within about five miles of one another in other southern Florida towns, including Coral Springs, Plantation, Fort Lauderdale, Miami and Coral Gables.” (“Sept. 11 riddles remain,” The Times Herald, Aug. 08, 2005.)

These two reports paint a clear picture of Israeli malfeasance. The Israelis, impersonating Muslim radicals, were creating a legend that was utilized by their kinsmen in the media and their stooges in the American government to propagate the ‘Al-Qaeda’ narrative. The second meaningful connection to all of this that must be noted is the foul intrigues of the corrupt Washington lobbyist Jack Abramoff. Abramoff is an Orthodox Jew and an avid reader of the Talmud. He has been described as “a fierce supporter of Israel — “a super-Zionist,” one associate says.” (Michael Isikoff, “Fund-Raising: Take It to the (West) Bank,” Newsweek, May 2, 2006.) In his career as a professional lobbyist, Abramoff was neck-deep in, as writer Justin Raimondo opined, “payoffs, phony nonprofit foundations, and other criminal activities up to and including murder.” (“Abramoff and the Israeli Connection,” Anti War, Jan. 12, 2006.) Using a phony charity called the Capital Athletic Fund, Abramoff funneled fraudulently obtained funds from Indian tribes to subsidize the murderous activities of fanatical Jewish settlers in the West Bank, such as a paramilitary outfit based in the ultra-Orthodox settlement of Beitar Illit. (Ibid.) Michael Isikoff, reporting on Abramoff’s illegal fundraising activities on behalf of Jewish colonizers in occupied Palestine, noted:

“More than $140,000 of foundation funds were actually sent to the Israeli West Bank where they were used by a Jewish settler to mobilize against the Palestinian uprising. Among the expenditures: purchases of camouflage suits, sniper scopes, night-vision binoculars, a thermal imager, and other material described in foundation records as ‘security’ equipment.” (“Fund-Raising: Take It to the (West) Bank,” Newsweek, May 2, 2006.)

Abramoff, who once referred to Palestinians as “dirty rats,” had extensive ties to the Jewish-Zionist world. The Jewish Telegraphic Agency admitted:

“While Abramoff has been portrayed as a man willing to do nearly anything to further his political goals and wallet, he also has been an idiosyncratic player in the Jewish community of the nation’s capital, starting several short-lived, money-losing ventures to fill religious gaps he saw in the city’s Jewish world. He also used his largess to further Israeli businesses and charities that appealed to his conservative worldview. Specifically, Abramoff is accused of using money from a Washington charity he oversaw to fund military-type programs in the West Bank. Indian tribes donated money to tax-exempt charities, believing they were supporting anti-gambling foundations, but the money was redirected to help a “sniper school” in the West Bank, operated by a friend of Abramoff. According to congressional documents, Abramoff sought night-vision goggles and a vehicle for the sniper-training facility.” (“Abramoff’s Jewish ties in spotlight,” Jewish Telegraphic Agency, Jan. 09, 2006.)

In 2006, Abramoff and his criminal cohort Adam Kidan were convicted of multiple counts of fraud, corruption, conspiracy, and tax evasion. Both of them were sentenced to 70 months in Federal prison, but Abramoff’s lawyers lobbied authorities to “place their client in a low-security prison with special facilities for observant Jews.” (Philip Shenon, “Abramoff Sentenced to Nearly 6 Years in Prison in Fraud Case,” New York Times, Mar. 29, 2006.) Abramoff only served 43 months of his sentence before being released on December 3, 2010. Abramoff had a certain suspicious connection to the 9/11 patsies discussed at length in this section. SunCruz Casinos was a company fraudulently acquired by Abramoff and Kidan from “Gus” Boulis, who was later gunned down Mafia-style in his car on February 6, 2001. (“More Guilty Pleas From Abramoff,” CBS News, May 3, 2010.) Several of the Arab patsies who were blamed for 9/11 reportedly boarded one of Abramoff’s SunCruz gambling boats in a still-unexplained visit on September 5th of 2001. (“SunCruz Casinos turns over documents in terrorist probe,” Associated Press, Sept. 26, 2001 / Daniel Hopsicker, “The Secret World of Jack Abramoff: Terrorists, Torpedos and Republican ‘Muscle’,” Mad Cow Morning News, June 21, 2005.) What possible thrill could gambling offer men getting ready to die in less than a week? And why would “fanatical Muslims” whose religion harshly condemns gambling as immoral be doing on a casino boat owned by a Zionist Jew? The Take Our World Back website, in its extensive report entitled “9/11 For Reality Deniers,” posited the following plausible scenario regarding this incident:

“Some of the alleged “9/11 hijackers” were reportedly seen on a SunCruz gambling boat shortly before 9/11. Any Arab patsies whom the 9/11 perpetrators needed to eliminate could have been lured into an ambush with the promise of “something special” such as a poker game where the patsies would be told they could “make a killing”.”

We have seen that most of these Arab patsies had reported that their passports had been lost or stolen in the years preceding the attack on 9/11. Stealing and forging passports to use on covert missions is a classic Mossad technique. Spy expert Gordon Thomas revealed that the Mossad “have a unit, a special team, who are trained in lifting passports.” (“Gordon Thomas, Mossad expert, on Dubaigate,” Euro News, Mar. 15, 2010.) In his book “By Way of Deception,” Victor Ostrovsky revealed that the Mossad has a factory in the illegal settlement of Petah Tikva dedicated specifically to producing fake passports for its spies and operatives. Back in 1997, Israel was forced to apologize to Canada after “two Mossad agents, using fake Canadian passports, failed in a bid to assassinate the Hamas leader Khalid Meshal in Amman, the Jordanian capital.” (Fred Lingel, “Israeli Agents Arrested in Plot To Forge Passports,” American Free Press, July 23, 2004.) In 2004, two reckless Mossad agents named Uriel Kelman and Eli Cara were convicted and jailed for six months for fraudulently attempting to obtain a New Zealand passport in the name of a tetraplegic man in order to create a false identity for another Mossad agent named Zev Barkan. (“‘Mossad spies’ jailed over New Zealand passport fraud,” The Guardian, July 16, 2004.) In 2010, a cadre of bloodthirsty Mossad assassins used dozens of false EU passports to travel to Dubai in order to kill Hamas commander Mahmoud al-Mabhouh. (“Arrest head of Mossad, Dubai police chief says,” The Telegraph, Feb. 18, 2010.) It should now be rather obvious to the reader what is really going on here.

All of these facts, occurrences and circumstances are consistent with, and highly indicative of, a typical Mossad false-flag provocation. That was the conclusion of Mohammed Atta’s own father, Muhammad Al Amir Atta, a semi-retired lawyer who lives in Cairo, Egypt. In a press conference shortly after the attacks, Atta’s father said that he spoke with his son on September 12th, the day after 9/11, and had a “normal conversation” with him. When asked about his son’s alleged involvement in the 9/11 attacks, the elder Atta frankly stated: “Mossad and Israel are who benefits the most from this… They want to try to hang this on the Arab world. When America learns that Mossad did it, they won’t be able to say anything.” (Ashraf Khalil, “Muhammad Atta Sr is in the center of the media storm,” Cairo Times, Volume 5, Issue 29, 27 Sept. – 3 Oct., 2001.) Based on all of these incredible facts and observations we can confidently surmise that Mohammed Atta, Ziad Jarrah, and by extension their seventeen alleged Arab-Muslim co-conspirators, are innocent victims of a Mossad conspiracy – a highly sophisticated frame-up operation on a scale that even Mossad had never before attempted in its long history of false-flag terrorism.

A significant part of the U.S. government’s version of events also rests on the comical “confessions” of the alleged masterminds of the atrocity – Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM) and Osama bin Laden (OBL). It has been widely acknowledged that all of the information and claims of responsibility that came from KSM were extracted through torture, and are thus completely useless and unreliable. (Richard Esposito, “How the CIA Broke the 9/11 Attacks Mastermind,” ABC News, Sept. 13, 2007 / “CIA waterboarded al-Qaida suspects 266 times,” The Guardian, April 20, 2009.) The New York Times reported that,

“C.I.A. officers used waterboarding at least 83 times in August 2002 against Abu Zubaydah, according to a 2005 Justice Department legal memorandum. Abu Zubaydah has been described as a Qaeda operative. …The 2005 memo also says that the C.I.A. used waterboarding 183 times in March 2003 against Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the self-described planner of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.” (Scott Shane, “Waterboarding Used 266 Times on 2 Suspects,” New York Times, April 19, 2009.)

KSM’s “confessions” were such an obvious farce that even former U.S. intelligence officers were openly doubting the credibility of his torture-induced claims of responsibility. (“March 15-23, 2007 and Shortly After: Media and Terrorism Analysts Respond to KSM Confession with Scepticism,” History Commons) On top of that, there is the issue of the dubious “bin Laden confession tape” which was touted by Zionist media pundits and American government officials as the ultimate proof of bin Laden’s and Al-Qaeda’s presumed guilt. (“Tape ‘proves Bin Laden’s guilt’,” BBC News, Dec. 14, 2001.) The tape was magically “discovered” in an abandoned house in Jalalabad, Afghanistan, by U.S. intelligence officials in December 2001, according to the official story. This ‘fortunate find’ doesn’t pass the smell test. The likelihood of finding such a small tape in a large city with a lot of buildings is astronomically low. Were squads of video watchers sent in to view every tape found just in case one showed Osama confessing? Top Bush administration officials have actually asserted that since bin Laden allegedly “confessed” to planning 9/11 on this tape they don’t have to prove his involvement in the attacks with tangible evidence. How convenient! U.S. Senator Ron Wyden, a Jew, revealed a distinct Zionist motivation behind the release of the video, stating that he’d hoped it would “remove suspicions in countries such as Pakistan that the 11 September attacks were an Israeli plot aimed at drawing the US into a war with Islamic countries.” (Ibid.) And that was the purpose the video ultimately served.

OBL-FAUX-CONFESSION-TAPEThe ‘confession tape’ is of very poor audio and visual quality, and the words being spoken by those seen on screen are barely audible. The authenticity of the tape has been seriously questioned by video experts. (“The Fake 2001 bin Laden Video Tape,” What Really Happened) In fact, a German television program investigated the matter and determined that the translation of the tape provided by the Pentagon was false. The show consulted two independent translators and an expert on oriental studies who analyzed the tape and found that the White House’s translation was not merely inaccurate but manipulative. (Craig Morris, “Mistranslated Osama bin Laden Video – the German Press Investigates,” Dec. 30, 2001.) One of the translators, Arabist Dr. Abdel El M. Husseini, stated: “I have carefully examined the Pentagon’s translation. This translation is very problematic. At the most important places where it is held to prove the guilt of Bin Laden, it is not identical with the Arabic.” (Ibid.) Gernot Rotter, a professor of Islamic and Arabic Studies at the Asia-Africa Institute at the University of Hamburg, explained: “The American translators who listened to the tapes and transcribed them apparently wrote a lot of things in that they wanted to hear but that cannot be heard on the tape no matter how many times you listen to it.” (Ibid.) I previously quoted from an interview conducted by the Pakistani daily Ummat with OBL that was published in Karachi a few weeks after the attacks in which he vehemently denies being behind 9/11, stating that people should investigate Israel and Zionism to trace the authorship of this crime as they were the only beneficiaries of such an event. Why would he initially deny involvement only to go on to take credit for it a few months later? If bin Laden was truly responsible for 9/11 he would have immediately and proudly acknowledged that fact.

Since 9/11 we have been inundated with a barrage of poor quality video and audio tapes purporting to be messages from Osama bin Laden, none of which have been authenticated or proven legitimate in the slightest degree. All of these were released at the most opportune times for the Bush administration. For example, in 2004, during Bush’s campaign for re-election, another OBL video surfaced at a time when Bush seemed to be falling in the polls. (“The Fake 2004 Bin Laden Video Tape,” What Really Happened) After the video was continuously aired and re-aired on all the mass media outlets, Bush’s approval rating quickly rose above that of his opponent John Kerry, leading to his re-election. Unsurprisingly, the video was proven to be a digitally created fake — a political ploy to help Bush win the election. (“Osama bin Laden: A Weapon of Mass Convenience,” What Really Happened)

It shouldn’t come as much of a surprise to learn that two former CIA officials have admitted to creating a fake video in which “darker-skinned” intelligence officers dressed up as Osama bin Laden and his associates in an effort to defame and discredit the Islamic leader throughout the Middle East. A former Army Intelligence case officer named Jeff Stein outlined the details in a Washington Post article. Stein revealed that during the planning of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the CIA’s Iraq Operations Group tossed around the idea of creating a fake video depicting Saddam Hussein having sex with a young teenage boy, and flooding copies of the tape throughout Iraqi cities to discredit and embarrass the Iraqi leader amongst his people. This dirty project never came to fruition, but Stein’s sources told him that the agency did previously concoct at least one fake bin Laden video:

“The agency actually did make a video purporting to show Osama bin Laden and his cronies sitting around a campfire swigging bottles of liquor and savoring their conquests with boys, one of the former CIA officers recalled, chuckling at the memory. The actors were drawn from “some of us darker-skinned employees,” he said.” (Jeff Stein, “CIA unit’s wacky idea: Depict Saddam as gay,” The Washington Post, May 25, 2010.)

Another reason to dismiss the legitimacy of these bin Laden tapes is that a preponderance of evidence indicates that OBL died in December of 2001. Sources in Pakistan and Afghanistan have confirmed this. In 2002, Pakistan’s President Pervez Musharraf and the Afghan President Hamid Karzai both stated that Bin Laden was “probably dead.” (“Karzai: bin Laden ‘probably’ dead,” CNN, Oct. 7, 2002 / “Pakistan’s Musharraf: Bin Laden probably dead,” CNN, Jan. 18, 2002.) A Taliban leader announced that OBL had “died a peaceful death due to an untreated lung complication” in December of 2001 in the vicinity of the Tora Bora Mountains and that thirty of OBL’s close followers and associates laid him to rest in a traditional Wahabi Muslim funeral. (“Report: Bin Laden Already Dead,” Fox News, Dec. 26, 2001.) An Egyptian newspaper carried a report on the funeral which was held in mid-December of 2001. (“News of Bin Laden’s Death and Funeral 10 days ago,” al-Wafd, Vol 15, No 4633, Dec. 26, 2001.)

Prior to 9/11, OBL had often been reported to be in poor health. It was reported that two months before September 11, OBL flew to Dubai for 10 days for treatment at the American hospital where he was visited by the local CIA agent. (“CIA agent alleged to have met Bin Laden in July,” The Guardian, Nov. 1, 2001.) In 2000, Le Figaro reported that OBL ordered a mobile dialysis machine to be delivered to his base at Kandahar in Afghanistan in order to treat his failing kidneys. (Ibid.) CNN’s medical correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, confirmed that OBL was most likely suffering from chronic kidney failure which requires dialysis treatment. Dialysis machines require electricity, clean water, and a sterile setting — without those things it is not likely that a person with this condition could survive for more than a few days. (“Dr. Sanjay Gupta: Bin Laden would need help if on dialysis,” CNN, Jan. 21, 2002.) That begs the question: how could OBL have survived all of these years in a desolate, isolated mountain hide-out with such chronic health issues that required constant medical attention and treatment? It is an impossibility!

The reality of OBL’s poor health and his eventual death in December of 2001 didn’t stop the despotic Bush administration and the Jewish-owned media from perpetuating the lie that OBL was still alive and still a ‘threat’ to America. The claim that the U.S. military and CIA were hunting down OBL and his group in Afghanistan is a giant sham that served as a convenient excuse to continue the military occupation of that country. Think about this: for over a decade the greatest military power in the history of the world, with all of its spy agencies, spy satellites, high-tech gadgets and listening devices, predator drones, F-15 and F-16 fighter jets, stealth aircraft and Apache helicopters, could not track down or kill one man!? This outlandish fable is simply not believable. The so-called “hunt for bin Laden” is a monstrous ruse to justify the “war on terror” hoax, which is in actuality a war of extermination targeting Israel’s enemies in the Middle East. The fact is that bin Laden died in December of 2001 — all intelligence agencies know this, but the popular image of OBL as an eternal ‘terrorist threat’ to America provides the Jewish-Zionist string-pullers controlling the U.S. Military Industrial Complex with a replenishing source of fear and paranoia to keep the ignorant masses of the West in line with their genocidal agenda for global supremacy.

OBL served as the ultimate patsy and fall-guy for the Jewish-Zionist conspirators behind 9/11. This point was expressed, although not directly, by veteran CIA agent Milt Bearden. On a CBS broadcast with Dan Rather the day after 9/11, Bearden stated: “This was a tremendously sophisticated operation against the United States—more sophisticated than anybody would have ascribed to Osama bin Laden.” (“CIA Talks About Bin Laden Being Trained By CIA on CNN,” YouTube) With regard to the widespread view that bin Laden was behind the attacks, he skeptically opined:

“I think Osama bin Laden has become the metaphor for the entire problem of terrorism involving Muslims with perceived grievances against the United States. I think it would be wrong to say this is a one-size-fits-all operation and to go after Bin Laden because an operation as sophisticated as [the one] carried out yesterday was an operation that was concealed from us for months… It happened without essentially a hitch except for one aircraft. And there is no reason to believe that these same people weren’t capable of covering their tracks somehow on the way out. Now I would go so far as to say that this group who was responsible for that, if they didn’t have an Osama bin Laden out there they’d invent one because he’s a terrific diversion for the rest of the world.” (Ibid.)

In interviews he has given to the press, OBL has often alluded to the dangerous reality of Jewish domination of the United States. He has said that the American imperial policy of occupation and destruction of Muslim countries is ferociously led by the Zionist Jews who control America through their malignant monopoly over the banking, media and political sectors of American society. Back in 1998, bin Laden issued a dire warning to the American people, suggesting that the death-grip of Organized Jewry on America is driving the country, and the world, towards hell on earth. Addressing the Jewish question, bin Laden said:

“The enmity between us and the Jews goes far back in time and is deep rooted. There is no question that war between the two of us is inevitable. The leaders in America and in other countries as well have fallen victim to Jewish Zionist blackmail. …

They have mobilized their people against Islam and against Muslims. Our mothers and daughters and sons are slaughtered every day with the approval of America and its support… And, while America blocks the entry of weapons into Islamic countries, it provides the Israelis with a continuous supply of arms allowing them thus to kill and massacre more Muslims.

The American government is leading the country toward hell. We say to the Americans as people and to American mothers, if they cherish their lives and if they cherish their sons, they must elect an American patriotic government that caters to their interests, not the interests of the Jews.” (Chris Bollyn, “What Does Bin Laden Really Want?,” American Free Press, Oct. 11, 2001.)

OBL-KILLED-NEWSIn 2011, the illegitimate U.S. president Barrack Obama attempted to perpetuate the myth of Osama bin Laden by staging a fake ‘assassination’ of an already dead OBL. The New York Times reported that “Osama bin Laden… was killed in a firefight with United States forces in Pakistan, President Obama announced on Sunday.” (“Bin Laden Is Dead, Obama Says,” New York Times, May 1, 2011.) OBL was supposedly camped “in a massive compound about an hour’s drive north from the Pakistani capital of Islamabad. He was hiding in the medium-sized city of Abbottabad, home to a large Pakistani military base and a military academy of the Pakistani Army.” (Ibid.) The suggestion that OBL could have been hiding out in this compound, which was located near a Pakistani military base, for years without anybody knowing about it is simply childish nonsense. An eyewitness to the event, who had lived on the same street as the compound where OBL was allegedly hiding, told Al Jazeera reporter Imtiaz Tyab flat out that the story was not true and that bin Laden had never been hiding in that house. The eyewitness said that he had walked by that house every night and even rented the house next door to his cousin, stating that he had not once seen Osama bin Laden or heard anything that would indicate OBL was residing in that house for an extended period of time. (“A witness account of Bin Laden’s death,” Al Jazeera English, May 2, 2011.)

Even more telling is the fact that OBL’s mythical ‘corpse’ was hastily “buried at sea” by the U.S. military before any impartial observers could identify the body — evidently because it was not the body of OBL if there even was a body at all. The U.S. government falsely claimed that this type of burial “complies with Islamic custom,” when in reality burial at sea is extremely uncommon for Muslims. (“Bin Laden’s body buried at sea,” The Guardian, May 2, 2011.) This means that the dramatic story of OBL’s alleged killing is based solely on the less-than-credible word of the U.S. government! In addition to these discrepancies, the official narrative of OBL’s assassination by U.S. forces was changed and altered by the Obama regime numerous times. They couldn’t even get their story straight — a tell-tale sign of fraud, cover-up and conspiracy. (“The killing of Osama bin Laden: how the White House changed its story,” The Guardian, May 4, 2011.) Brazen evidence of a hoax came right on the heels of the news of OBL’s alleged killing, when some mass media outlets quickly published a gruesome picture of a bloodied and presumably ‘dead’ OBL. The photograph was immediately exposed as a sloppy fake. The Guardian reported:

“An image apparently showing a dead Osama bin Laden broadcast on Pakistani television and picked up by British newspaper websites is a fake. The bloodied image of a man with matted hair and a blank, half-opened eye has been circulating on the internet for the past two years. It was used on the front pages of the Mail, Times, Telegraph, Sun and Mirror websites, though swiftly removed after the fake was exposed on Twitter.” (“Osama bin Laden corpse photo is fake,” The Guardian, May 2, 2011.)

To sum up, Osama bin Laden and ‘Al-Qaeda’ did not commit 9/11 and were not capable of doing so even if they wanted to. The popular image of bin Laden as the “arch-villain” and nemesis of the U.S. serves the same purpose for the American government that the “Emmanuel Goldstein” character did for the tyrannical regime depicted in George Orwell’s classic novel ‘1984’ — an artificial enemy manufactured by the state to rule the population with fear. OBL and ‘Al-Qaeda’ are not an actual threat, but merely a weapon of propaganda for the U.S. government and the Jewish agenda that drives it. The myth of Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda has been used to hoodwink the American public into supporting the imperial schemes of Zionism.

© 2013 Zander C. Fuerza

Download the complete book HERE

Posted in Masters of Deception Book | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Masters of Deception: Chapter Four

MASTERS OF DECEPTION COVER 1CHAPTER FOUR

The Hidden Hand of Zion Surfaces

In a miraculous display of Jewish “clairvoyance,” Israel’s preeminent spymaster Isser Harel — the founder of the Mossad and Shin Bet — predicted 9/11 with incredible accuracy. In 1979, Michael Evans, a Christian Zionist from the U.S., visited Isser Harel at his home in Israel wherein Harel proceeded to tell him over dinner that a terrorist attack upon New York City’s “tallest building” was imminent. Evans recounted this strange affair in this way:

“On Sept. 23, 1979, the founder of Israeli intelligence over dinner told me that America was developing a tolerance for terror. The gentleman’s name was Isser Harel, the founder of Mossad Israeli intelligence — he ran it from 1947 to 1963. He told me that America had developed an alliance between two countries, Israel and Saudi Arabia, and that the alliance with Saudi Arabia was dangerous and would develop a tolerance for terror among Americans. He said if the tolerance continued that Islamic fundamentalists would ultimately strike America. I said “Where?” He said, “In Islamic theology, the phallic symbol is very important. Your biggest phallic symbol is New York City and your tallest building will be the phallic symbol they will hit.” Isser Harel prophesied that the tallest building in New York would be the first building hit by Islamic fundamentalists 21 years ago.” (“Is America In Bible Prophecy?,” Belief Net, August 2004.)

ISSER HARREL 911As an Israeli spy master learned in the art of deception, Harel did his best to pull the wool over Evans’ eyes. Anyone knowledgeable in the topic of symbolism will tell you that the phallus is an important symbol in Masonic ideology, not “Islamic theology.” Freemasonry is fundamentally based on the rites and rituals of Judaism and the occult Kabbalah (Jewish mysticism). (Texe Marrs, “Masonic Jews Plot To Control World,” Power of Prophecy) Therefore, in truth — Harel’s attempt at deceit notwithstanding — it is Masonic Jews, not Islamic Arabs, who have an affinity for phallic symbols.

Zionist Jews have quite a knack for predicting future events. This is not because they have any kind of supernatural gift of foresight but because they are fond of subtly stating their evil plans before putting them into action. Call it arrogance, this twisted supremacist mentality affecting these Jewish schemers manifests in many unorthodox ways. What Isser Harel’s “prediction” represents is a subtle confession that the 9/11 plot was hatched in Israel. In his career as a Jewish terrorist, Harel spearheaded the Israeli strategy of terrorizing the West into submission by conducting false-flag operations as a method of coercion. He was involved in the Lavon Affair and was responsible for initiating “The Damocles Operation” of the early 1960s, which was a terror bombing and assassination campaign that targeted scores of German scientists to prevent them from helping Egypt develop its defense systems.

In a shocking coincidence, The Washington Times published an article one day before 9/11 shedding light on a study that was conducted by the Army School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS) which devised a plan for enforcing a major Israeli-Palestinian peace accord that would require about 20,000 well-armed troops stationed throughout Israel and a newly created Palestinian state. The study calls Israel’s armed forces a “500-pound gorilla in Israel. Well armed and trained. Operates in both Gaza and the West Bank. Known to disregard international law to accomplish mission.” Of the Mossad, the Israeli secret service, the SAMS officers say: “Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.” (“U.S. troops would enforce peace under Army study,” The Washington Times, Sept. 10, 2001.) This stunning revelation was indicative of what was to come a day later — Israel would strike America and disguise it as an Arab act. To cover for themselves, the Mossad passed along an unspecific “general warning” to the CIA a month before 9/11 alleging that as many as two hundred terrorists were present on American soil and were preparing a major operation. The Mossad linked the plot to Osama bin Laden and told their CIA counterparts that there were “strong grounds for suspecting Iraqi involvement.” (“Israeli security issued urgent warning to CIA of large-scale terror attacks,” The Telegraph, Sept. 16, 2001.) This was by no means a legitimate “warning.” It was planted propaganda — a clever way for the Israelis to deflect suspicion away from themselves as perpetrators and onto their Arab enemies whom they have always ventured to set up as targets for U.S. military aggression. Victor Ostrovsky, in his two books “By Way of Deception” and “The Other Side of Deception,” demonstrates that the Mossad often gives out useless warnings as a way of making themselves look innocent when in fact the opposite is true.

Shortly after the 9/11 attacks, Zionist propagandists went straight to work. Aman, Israel’s central military intelligence service, immediately claimed that Iraq had been involved in the attacks. (Bamford, James. A Pretext for War: 9/11, Iraq, and the Abuse of America’s Intelligence Agencies. New York: Doubleday, 2004, p. 311.) Rafi Eitan, a delusional former head of Mossad, also laughably held that “the Iraqi dictator,” Saddam Hussein, was the “mastermind” of the attacks. (Dennis Eisenberg, “Ex-Mossad Chief, Iraq was Behind the Attacks,” Herald Sun (Australia), Sept. 23, 2001.) These baseless lies maligning Iraq emerged from the mouths of accusatory Zionist terrorist kingpins – the masters of deception – but these false accusations didn’t get very far. Instead, Israel’s dirty fingerprints which are all over this crime have made their way to the surface, despite intense Jewish efforts to suppress the truth.

In November of 2001, Fox News aired an explosive four part series detailing a secretive investigation that was being conducted by U.S. authorities into Israeli espionage in the United States. (Google users search: “Fox News Israeli 9/11 Spy Scandal”) The report revealed that around two hundred Israeli spies had been arrested by American authorities — the largest spy ring to be uncovered in U.S. history. One hundred and forty of the Israelis had been taken into custody just prior to 9/11 and the remaining sixty had been apprehended shortly thereafter in connection with the ongoing investigation into the attacks. In the first part of the series, Fox News Correspondent Carl Cameron reported:

Since Sept. 11, more than 60 Israelis have been arrested or detained, either under the new patriot anti-terrorism law, or for immigration violations. A handful of active Israeli military were among those detained, according to investigators, who say some of the detainees also failed polygraph questions when asked about alleged surveillance activities against and in the United States.

. . . investigators suspect that the Israelis may have gathered intelligence about the [9/11] attacks in advance, and not shared it. A highly placed investigator said there are “tie-ins.” But when asked for details, he flatly refused to describe them, saying, “evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It’s classified information.”

Fox News has learned that one group of Israelis, spotted in North Carolina recently, is suspected of keeping an apartment in California to spy on a group of Arabs who the United States is also investigating for links to terrorism. Numerous classified documents obtained by Fox News indicate that even prior to Sept. 11, as many as 140 other Israelis had been detained or arrested in a secretive and sprawling investigation into suspected espionage by Israelis in the United States.

Investigators from numerous government agencies are part of a working group that’s been compiling evidence since the mid ’90s. These documents detail hundreds of incidents in cities and towns across the country that investigators say, “may well be an organized intelligence gathering activity.”

The first part of the investigation focuses on Israelis who say they are art students from the University of Jerusalem and Bazala Academy. They repeatedly made contact with U.S. government personnel, the report says, by saying they wanted to sell cheap art or handiwork.

Documents say they, “targeted and penetrated military bases.” The DEA, FBI and dozens of government facilities, and even secret offices and unlisted private homes of law enforcement and intelligence personnel. The majority of those questioned, ‘stated they served in military intelligence, electronic surveillance intercept and or explosive ordinance units.’

foxnews-911-israelIn the closing segment of the first broadcast, Fox News anchor Brit Hume and Carl Cameron talked about Israeli prior knowledge of 9/11. Cameron was careful not to directly implicate the Israelis, but quoted investigators who posed the question, “How could they [the Israelis] not have known [that 9/11 was going to happen]?” Carl Cameron then cited a defense intelligence report which spoke of Israel’s “voracious appetite for information.” The report further stated that the Israelis “are motivated by strong survival instincts which dictate every possible facet of their political and economical policies. It aggressively collects military and industrial technology and the U.S. is a high priority target.” Also highlighted in this series were the intrigues of two Israeli telecommunications companies, Amdocs Ltd. and Comverse Infosys, who, investigators say, were engaged in spying and illegal wiretapping of American phones, including those of U.S. government employees. Amdocs Ltd. handled all of the call records and billing for the 25 largest American phone companies, meaning virtually every telecom record in the USA was routed through Amdocs. Information obtained through these companies was being used by the Israelis to undermine the efforts of U.S. investigators looking into Israeli organized crime and drug trafficking operations. In regard to 9/11, these companies were being used to undermine the work of honest officials in the FBI and other U.S. agencies who had been tracking the movements of several of the Arab patsies whom the Israelis were preparing to frame for their false-flag attack on 9/11.

Fox News and ABC News, the two mainstream media outlets that actually covered the Israeli 9/11 spy ring scandal, were pressured to drop any further coverage and to remove all previous references to the case from their archives. Journalist Christopher Ketcham made note of this Zionist censorship campaign:

“Media outlets that run stories even mildly critical of Israel often find themselves targeted by organized campaigns, including form-letter e-mails, the cancellation of subscriptions, and denunciations of the organization and its reporters and editors as anti-Semites. Cameron, for example, was excoriated by various pro-Israel lobbying groups for his exposé [of Israel's 9/11-connected spy ring]. … In a December interview with Salon, CAMERA’s associate director, Alex Safian, said that several “Jewish/Israeli groups” were having “conversations” with representatives of Fox News regarding Cameron’s piece. … Oddly, four days after the Cameron investigation ran, all traces of his report — transcripts, Web links, headlines — disappeared from the Foxnews.com archives. … (when you entered the old URL, a Fox screen appeared with the message “This story no longer exists”).” (“The Israeli “art student” mystery,” Salon, May 7, 2002.)

Coincidentally, in the third part of the series on Israeli espionage Carl Cameron reported that “investigators within the DEA, INS and FBI have all told Fox News that to pursue or even suggest Israeli spying . . . is considered career suicide.” In light of this evidence about a massive Israeli espionage ring amounting to two hundred or so Israeli operatives conducting spying, surveillance, and possibly even more sinister activities in the U.S. before 9/11, it appears that the Mossad’s phony “warning” to the CIA that two hundred Arab terrorists were moving throughout the country and preparing a major attack is just a projection of what the Israelis were actually doing. Veteran Anti War staff writer, Justin Raimondo, commented on the significance of what Carl Cameron and Fox News had reported about the Israeli spy ring, stating:

“What is striking about Fox News Reporter Carl Cameron’s portrait of Israel’s spy network in the U.S. is the sheer vastness of his subject. The broad scope of the Israeli spy operation, with its many fronts and activities conducted coast to coast… In the months leading up to 9/11, Cameron claimed, Israel was waging a covert war against its principal ally and benefactor, the United States.” (“The Terror Enigma: Israel and the September 11 Connection,” Chronicles Intelligence Assessment, August 2003)

It took no time at all for the Zionist hand to emerge from the smoking ruins of the World Trade Center on September 11th, 2001. The first suspects arrested on 9/11 in connection to the attacks were not Muslims with links to Al-Qaeda, but Israelis with ties to the Mossad. The New York Times reported that a group of five men had set up video cameras “aimed at the Twin Towers prior to the attack… and were seen congratulating one another afterwards.” (“One Arrested, Others Detained at NY Airports,” Fox News, Sept. 14, 2001.) Police received several calls from upset New Jersey residents claiming “Middle Eastern men” with a white van were videotaping the disaster with shouts of joy and mockery. The suspicious men had also gone to extreme lengths to photograph themselves with the Twin Towers burning in the backdrop. A New Jersey homemaker named Maria witnessed three of the men standing on top of a white van in the parking lot of her apartment building shortly after the first plane struck the North Tower. She told reporters: “They seemed to be taking a movie…  They were like happy, you know … They didn’t look shocked to me. I thought it was very strange.” (“The White Van: Were Israelis Detained on Sept. 11 Spies?,” ABC News 20/20, June 21, 2002.) On September 12, 2001, journalist Paulo Lima of The Record N.J. News reported on the arrest of the jubilant ‘high-fivers’ who turned out to be Israelis. Here is an excerpt of his report:

About eight hours after terrorists struck Manhattan’s tallest skyscrapers, police in Bergen County detained five men who they said were found carrying maps linking them to the blasts.

The five men, who were in a van stopped on Route 3 in East Rutherford around 4:30 p.m., were being questioned by police but had not been charged with any crime late Tuesday. The Bergen County Police bomb squad X-rayed packages but did not find any explosives, authorities said. However, sources close to the investigation said they found other evidence linking the men to the bombing plot. “There are maps of the city in the car with certain places highlighted,” the source said. “It looked like they’re hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park.”

Sources also said that bomb-sniffing dogs reacted as if they had detected explosives, although officers were unable to find anything. The FBI seized the van for further testing, authorities said. Sources said the van was stopped as it headed east on Route 3, between the Hackensack River bridge and the Sheraton hotel. …

Sources close to the investigation said the men said they were Israeli tourists, but police had not been able to confirm their identities. Authorities would not release their names. East Rutherford officers stopped the van after the FBI’s Newark Field Office broadcast an alert asking surrounding police departments to look for a white Chevrolet van, police said.

“We got an alert to be on the lookout for a white Chevrolet van with New Jersey registration and writing on the side,” said Bergen County Police Chief John Schmidig. “Three individuals were seen celebrating in Liberty State Park after the impact. They said three people were jumping up and down.”

The East Rutherford officers summoned the county police bomb squad, New Jersey state troopers, and FBI agents, who waited alongside the van as prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney’s Office tried to obtain a warrant to search the van late Tuesday, Schmidig said.

By 10 p.m., members of the bomb squad were picking through the van and X-raying packages found inside, Schmidig said. Sources said the FBI alert, known as a BOLO or “Be On Lookout,” was sent out at 3:31 p.m. It read: “Vehicle possibly related to New York terrorist attack. White, 2000 Chevrolet van with ‘Urban Moving Systems’ sign on back seen at Liberty State Park, Jersey City, NJ, at the time of first impact of jetliner into World Trade Center. “Three individuals with van were seen celebrating after initial impact and subsequent explosion. FBI Newark Field Office requests that, if the van is located, hold for prints and detain individuals.”

Business records show an Urban Moving Systems with offices on West 50th Street in Manhattan and on West 18th Street in Weehawken. Telephone messages left at the businesses Tuesday evening were not immediately returned. Business records show the owner as Dominik Suter of Fair Lawn.…” (“Five men detained as suspected conspirators,” The Record N.J. News, Sept. 12, 2001.)

After being pulled over by the NYPD, the driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, told the officers, “We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem.” (“The White Van: Were Israelis Detained on Sept. 11 Spies?,” ABC News 20/20, June 21, 2002.) The other passengers were his brother Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner and Omer Marmari. The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious when they found maps of the city with certain places highlighted, $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and foreign passports. (Ibid.) The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of which shows Sivan Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the smouldering ruins of the WTC in an apparently celebratory gesture. (Doug Saunders, “U.S. arrests of Israelis a mystery,” The Globe and Mail, Dec. 17, 2001.) After their arrest, the five dancing Israelis were not cooperative with U.S. authorities, refusing to answer questions about their suspicious activities. They were asked to take polygraph tests but refused to take them. After weeks of silence, the five Israelis finally agreed to take polygraph examinations, and failed them miserably. Pretending to be tourists on a working holiday, the Israelis’ cover was blown when the FBI confirmed that at least two of the five dancing Jews were registered agents of the Mossad and that Urban Moving Systems, the ostensible employer of the five Israelis, was a front operation for Israeli Intelligence. (Christopher Ketcham, “High-Fivers and Art Student Spies: What Did Israel Know in Advance of the 9/11 Attacks?,” Counter Punch, March 07, 2007.) The Israelis were held in custody for 71 days before being quietly released. A former CIA counterterrorism officer told journalist Christopher Ketcham:

“There was no question but that [the order to close down the investigation of the dancing Israelis] came from the White House. It was immediately assumed at CIA headquarters that this basically was going to be a cover-up so that the Israelis would not be implicated in any way in 9/11.” (Ibid.)

FiveDancingIsraelisAfter returning home to Israel, three of the five dancing Israelis appeared on a popular Israeli talk show to discuss their ordeal in America. One of the Israelis, presumably Oded Ellner, stated: “The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event.” (“Five Dancing Israelis Arrested on 9/11,” YouTube) A private American citizen recently obtained FBI and NYPD reports relating to the five dancing Israelis incident by filing a Freedom of Information Act request, and published the documents on the internet. These reports confirm many of the reputed occurrences surrounding the five dancing Israelis and their prior knowledge of what was to come on 9/11. (See: “The official 2001 FBI docs on Urban Moving Systems and the 9-11-2001 Dancing Israelis incident,” My Big Fat Anti-Zionist Life Blogspot, Aug. 17, 2011 / “The “Dancing Israelis” FBI Report – Debunked,” Take Our World Back Website) To cover for the Israelis the documents have been heavily redacted, but they confirm, for example, that the five dancing Israelis were already observing the World Trade Center disaster from the Doric Apartment complex’s parking lot less than five minutes after the first plane struck the North Tower and that they were filming, cheering and celebrating before the second plane hit the South Tower.

It must be pointed out that when the first plane struck the North Tower nobody quite understood exactly what had happened. Most innocent bystanders who witnessed the event initially assumed that it was just a tragic accidental plane crash, not a terror attack. It wasn’t until the second plane hit the South Tower when everybody realized that this was a premeditated and coordinated terrorist attack. Why would these Israelis go to such extreme lengths to “document” what was initially thought to be an ordinary plane crash when they could have just learned from the media what had happened later in the day? More importantly, why were they so happy, joyful and celebratory over what was thought to be an accidental plane crash? What kind of sick-minded people would celebrate, laugh and joke about a plane crash? The only logical conclusions that can be drawn from the bizarre behavior of the Israelis are:

1) Upon the impact of the first plane they were immediately cognizant that this was indeed a terrorist attack, not an accidental plane crash, before anyone could have known for sure that that was the case. This reveals that they most certainly had advanced prior knowledge of the date, time, place and nature of attacks.

2) They were celebrating because they were pleased with the outcome of the greatest Israeli spy operation in history, where Arabs would be blamed for an unprecedented terror attack on American soil resulting in a full-scale U.S. invasion and occupation of several Arab/Islamic States in the Middle East, whom Israel has long sought to weaken and destroy. More broadly, this event would ignite a “clash of civilizations” between the West and the Islamic World for the benefit of Israel and International Jewry.

The previously cited FBI report confirms that the dancing Israelis took 76 photographs of themselves, all of which show them to be “visibly happy.” The report also recounted some of the self-incriminating statements attributed to several of the dancing Israelis after being taken into custody. Oded Ellner confessed to being happy because he believed “that the United States will [now] take steps to stop terrorism in the world.” Omer Marmari is quoted in the report as having said that, “Israel now has hope that the world will now understand us.” Why would they think that? And how did they know that these attacks would benefit Israel before anybody had the faintest clue as to who perpetrated them? These brazen statements by Oded Ellner and Omer Marmari — taken in conjunction with the proclamations of Ehud Barak and Ariel Sharon on 9/11 that the USA should initiate and lead a new “global war on terror” — are dead giveaways as to Israel’s motive for committing 9/11: leading America by the nose on an endless path of war against their enemies in the Middle East!

An American employee of Urban Moving Systems, the Israeli Intelligence front company where the five dancing Israelis also worked, said that the majority of his co-workers were Israelis and were joking on the day of the attacks. He told The Record of New Jersey: “I was in tears. These guys were joking and that bothered me. These guys were like, ‘Now America knows what we go through.’” (Scott DaVault, “Urban Moving Systems and Detained Israelis,” What Really Happened) Other strange happenings at Urban Moving Systems headquarters in Weehawken, New Jersey, were unveiled in the FBI’s report. For instance, a former Urban Moving Systems employee later contacted the Newark Division of the FBI with information indicating that he had quit his job at the company due to a high amount of anti-American sentiment present among Urban’s employees. The former employee stated that an Israeli employee of Urban had even once remarked: “Give us twenty years and we’ll take over your media and destroy your country.” He also told the FBI that Dominik Suter, the Israeli owner of the dubious front company Urban Moving Systems, was a sleazy crook who would constantly cheat his customers out of money and that Suter constantly spoke badly of the United States. Also mentioned by the former employee was that the Jewish/Israeli workers always spoke Hebrew in his presence and that they had frequent meetings in the company’s office which he and the other non-Jewish employees were never invited to attend.

Urban Moving Systems is more than likely the hub wherein Israel’s Mossad coordinated their false-flag operation against America on 9/11. The Israeli owner of this Mossad front company, Dominik Otto Suter, set up his phony business with a small loan of nearly $500,000 from the U.S. government itself. (“Urban Moving Systems: the US-Israeli 9/11 Financial Nexus,” Under The Radar Media Blogspot, June 19, 2008.) Soon after the attacks, Suter was questioned by the FBI but was evasive. When the FBI returned to question him again he was gone, having abruptly fled the country back to Israel. ABC News reported:

“… sources told ABCNEWS . . . that the FBI believed Urban Moving may have been providing cover for an Israeli intelligence operation. After the five men [the dancing Israelis] were arrested, the FBI got a warrant and searched Urban Moving’s Weehawken, N.J., offices. The FBI searched Urban Moving’s offices for several hours, removing boxes of documents and a dozen computer hard drives. The FBI also questioned Urban Moving’s owner [Dominik Otto Suter]. His attorney insists that his client answered all of the FBI’s questions. But when FBI agents tried to interview him again a few days later, he was gone. Three months later 2020′s cameras photographed the inside of Urban Moving, and it looked as if the business had been shut down in a big hurry. Cell phones were lying around; office phones were still connected; and the property of dozens of clients remained in the warehouse. The owner had also cleared out of his New Jersey home, put it up for sale and returned with his family to Israel.” (“Were Israelis Detained on Sept. 11 Spies?,” ABC News 20/20, June 21, 2002.)

The blatantly guilty demeanor of Suter and the five dancing Israelis makes it quite obvious that they were heavily involved in the attacks. Recall the suggestive remarks of dancing Mossad agent Sivan Kurzberg that, “We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem.” This statement clearly illustrates the intention of the Israelis to frame Palestinians and other Arabs for terrorism against America in an effort to demonize their Middle Eastern adversaries and draw the U.S. into a conflict with the opponents of Israeli imperialism. In doing so, the treacherous Israelis endeavored to bring American public opinion in line with expansionist Israeli foreign policy objectives. This reality manifested on the evening of September 11, 2001, when Israeli operatives attempted to detonate a truck bomb on the George Washington Bridge, which they intended to have blamed on Palestinians, in what amounts to a classic false-flag operation. The Jerusalem Post reported that a white van packed with explosives was stopped by police as it approached the George Washington Bridge:

“American security services overnight stopped a car bomb on the George Washington Bridge connecting New York and New Jersey. The van, packed with explosives, was stopped on an approach ramp to the bridge. Authorities suspect the terrorists intended to blow up the main crossing between New Jersey and New York, Army Radio reported.” (“Car bomb found on George Washington Bridge,” The Jerusalem Post, Sept. 12, 2001.)

911-GWBRIDGE-TRUCK-BOMB-FOX-NEWSFOX News reported:

“…two suspects are in FBI custody after a truckload of explosives was discovered around the George Washington Bridge … The FBI … says enough explosives were in the truck to do great damage to the George Washington Bridge.”

GWBRIDGE-VAN-EXPLOSIVES-WCBS-REPORTWCBS News reported:

“… Most of New York City’s rescue operations and their police and fire departments have been concentrating their actions down in lower Manhattan where two planes hit the two towers of the World Trade Center. But some very … intelligent and aggressive cops also stopped another terrorist attack from happening on the George Washington Bridge. CBS2 has learned exclusively that two men are in custody after being arrested at the George Washington Bridge with an entire truckload of explosives. Now I’m told that those explosives could have been enough to blow up the entire span [of the bridge] and all the cars and the people that were on it.” (“9/11 George Washington Bridge – Truck Full Of Explosives And Two Suspects In Custody (Rare WCBS),” YouTube)

The existence of this truck bomb was independently reported by CNN, Fox News, ABC News, CBS News, and other major media outlets. (See: “Mossad Truck Bombs on Sept 11,” YouTube) The ethnicity and nationality of the two terror suspects was conveniently withheld from all of the media reports, for the obvious reason that the would-be bombers were Jewish Israelis and not Islamic Arabs. If they were Arabs or Muslims, the Jewish-owned press would have made a huge deal out of it. Pretty soon after the arrest of the two Israeli terrorists, media reporting on the attempted bombing of the George Washington Bridge abruptly stopped and previous reports on this incredible incident began vanishing. A desperate and conspicuous attempt was being made by the Jewish media bosses to sweep this blatant episode of Jewish terrorism under the rug. In a sloppy attempt to pre-frame Palestinians for this would-be truck bomb explosion on the G. W. Bridge, two Jewish sayans placed anonymous calls to the NYPD claiming to have spotted a group of “Palestinians” constructing a bomb in a van, and that they were headed towards the Holland tunnel. Here’s the transcript from NBC News:

Dispatcher: Jersey City police.

Caller 1: Yes, we have a white van, 2 or 3 guys in there, they look like Palestinians and going around a building.

Caller 2: There’s a minivan heading toward the Holland tunnel, I see the guy by Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh uniform.

Dispatcher: He has what?

Caller: He’s dressed like an Arab.

(Source: “911 Tapes Tell Horror Of 9/11, Part 2, Tapes Released For First Time,” NBC TV, June 17, 2002 / “Core of Corruption – Film 1 – In the Shadows – Part 10,” YouTube)

The callers gave themselves away as Zionist Jews when they said that these alleged bomb-makers “look like Palestinians” and were dressed in “sheik uniform.” First of all, how would the caller have known that these “Arabs” were Palestinian as opposed to some other kind of Arab like Iraqi, Syrian, Saudi, Lebanese, and so on? Secondly, Palestinians usually dress in western-style clothes, not “sheik uniform.” Who other than Zionists have an axe to grind with Palestinians specifically to make a false 9-1-1 frame-up call of this nature? The mystery caller led the police to believe that the truck bomb was headed towards the Holland tunnel when in actuality it was stopped approaching the George Washington Bridge — a classic misdirection ploy. Fortunately for New Yorkers it was unsuccessful — the Israelis were caught red-handed trying to blow up a New York City bridge and have it blamed on their Palestinian enemies. The Jewish terrorists were fortunate in that their Zionist allies who control the American government and news media covered up their misdeeds and have made grand efforts to erase this incident from the historical record. Certainly, very few Americans even know that it took place. This goes to show the hypnotic power of the mass media, which is under the control of criminal Zionist Jews who were complicit with Israel in the attacks.

911-DANCING-PALESTINIANS-FAKETo draw attention away from the fact that two Israeli agents tried to bomb the George Washington Bridge, and to further bury the explosive story of the five celebrating Israeli Mossad operatives who were arrested in New Jersey, the Jewish-owned news media — in a premeditated incitement to genocide — repeatedly aired a dubious video clip of Palestinians supposedly celebrating the 9/11 attacks in the West Bank. (See: “Muslims “Palestinians” Celebrating 9/11 (CNN – Fox),” YouTube) The video, which was later exposed as a fraud, served the agenda of the Zionist masterminds behind 9/11 expertly, as it portrayed the Palestinians as supporters of terrorism. Israel immediately capitalized on the dehumanizing effect of this duplicitous anti-Palestinian propaganda video. Within ten minutes of the first plane striking the North Tower on 9/11 Israel launched ethnic cleansing operations into the occupied Palestinian territories. This incredible fact was divulged by Noam Chayut, a former Israeli soldier, in an interview with Alternate Focus. (“Burning Conscience: Israeli Soldiers Speak Out,” YouTube) The New York Times also reported on the murderous Israeli incursions into the West Bank village of Jenin that was initiated on the heels of 9/11:

“A surge of violence punctuated by an Israeli tank thrust into a West Bank town left eight Palestinians dead today, including a 9-year-old girl, as well as an Israeli settler shot dead by Palestinian gunmen. After a day of intense violence, Palestinian officials accused the Israelis of stepping up military actions while international attention was focused on the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington. “The Israelis are exploiting the world’s preoccupation with events in the U.S. to carry on with their crimes against the Palestinian people,” said Yasir Abed Rabbo, a senior aide to Yasir Arafat, the Palestinian leader…” (Joel Greenberg, “8 Palestinians and an Israeli Settler Killed in a Surge of Violence,” New York Times, Sept. 13, 2001.)

Moreover, at 9:34 am on 9/11 Abu Dhabi television reported that it received a call from the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine, a left-wing faction of the PLO, claiming responsibility for crashing two planes into the WTC. (“America’s day of terror: Timeline,” BBC News, Sept. 12, 2001.) This claim was immediately denied by the DFLP leader Qais abu Leila who said it had always opposed “terror attacks on civilian targets, especially outside the occupied territories.” (“World shock over U.S. attacks,” CNN, Sept. 11, 2001.) Common sense dictates that this “claim of responsibility” was simply another lame hoax by Israel to frame Palestinians for the 9/11 attacks. A short time after 9/11, Israel’s Mossad was caught red-handed by Palestinian authorities trying to create a phony ‘Al-Qaeda terrorist cell’ in Gaza in order to justify new Israeli attacks and aggression against the Palestinians. (“Israel ‘faked al-Qaeda presence’,” BBC News, Dec. 8, 2002.)

On 9/11, the Zionist terrorist network behind the attacks put their sick and twisted mentality on full display. Probably the most shocking and unusual event of the day came in the form of another white van that was stopped by NYPD officers in between 6th and 7th Avenue on King Street. Police recordings that have been released to the public indicate that this van had a mural/painting on its side that literally depicted a remote controlled plane crashing into the World Trade Center and exploding! Here is a portion of the police transmission detailing this bizarre incident:

officer: [inaudible] … on air?

officer: The plane… [inaudible] … explosives on King and 6th Avenue.

officer: King and 6th Avenue you said?

officer: One of those remote-controlled planes filled with explosives.

officer: 10-5 … that plane message.

officer: 5 the message about the remote-controlled plane.

officer: Central, clear the air for the message about the plane.

officer: Central, we need the bomb squad and ESU over at King and…

officer: Central I got a message on that, uh, plane. It’s, it’s a, it’s a big truck with a mural painted of a, of an airplane diving into New York City and exploding. We don’t know what’s in the truck… the truck is in between 6th and 7th on King Street.

officer: All right. 10-4. I’ll send ESU and the bomb squad there, forthwith Kay.

officer: 10-5 that last message.

officer: with a mural painted… uh… airplane diving into New York blowin up. Two men got out of the truck — ran away from it — we got those two under.

officer: We have both suspects under, Kay… We have the suspects who driv… drove in the van, THE VAN EXPLODED, we have both of them under, Kay, let’s get some help over here.

officer: What location?

officer: King Street between 6th and 7th.

(To listen to the recording, see: “Remote Controlled planes NYPD Recording on 9/11,” YouTube)

The existence of the mural van was corroborated by a report put out by the Norman Y. Mineta International Institute for Surface Transportation Policy Studies (MTI) entitled “Saving City Lifelines: Lessons Learned in the 9-11 Terrorist Attacks”. On page 28 of the report it states:

“There were continuing moments of alarm. A panel truck with a painting of a plane flying into the World Trade Center was stopped near the temporary command post. It proved to be rented to a group of ethnic Middle Eastern people who did not speak English. Fearing that it might be a truck bomb, the NYPD immediately evacuated the area, called out the bomb squad, and detained the occupants until a thorough search was made. The vehicle was found to be an innocent delivery truck.”

The MTI report — while confirming that there was indeed a van with a painting on its side astonishingly depicting the events that were unfolding just blocks away — attempts to hide the fact that the mural van subsequently exploded, which was stated multiple times by NYPD officers in the aforementioned police radio recording. The MTI report affirms that the mural van was rented to “ethnic Middle Eastern people who did not speak English.” Say, if these Middle Easterners were Arabs don’t you suppose that the mainstream media would have been having a field day over this incident and wouldn’t it have been highlighted in the official 9/11 Commission Report? Strangely, it was completely ignored and forgotten by both the media and the U.S. government. Common sense dictates that if these two Middle Eastern suspects were Muslim Arabs — who had rented a delivery truck and painted the 9/11 attack scenario on the side of it and then parked it near the WTC on 9/11 — than it would have been plastered all over the television and printing press as proof of an “Arab/Al-Qaeda conspiracy,” which the Jewish media was keen on promoting from the outset. It would have coincided perfectly with the ‘Al-Qaeda’ narrative being trumpeted by Ariel Sharon, Ehud Barak and America’s Jewish-run mass media. Since the mural van incident was deliberately hidden from the public, the only logical conclusion that can be extracted from this information is that these “ethnic Middle Easterners” were Jewish Israelis, not Islamic Arabs. The preposterous conclusion of the MTI report that the 9/11 mural van turned out to be nothing more than an “innocent delivery truck” is so absurd that further comment would be superfluous.

More proof of Israeli and Jewish foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks was revealed by a Jewish resident of New Jersey who was a former Israeli soldier and veteran of the Yom Kippur War of 1973. In October 2000, approximately 11 months prior to September 11, 2001, the Jewish man was collecting English Ivy cuttings at the Gomel Chesed Jewish Cemetery located at Mccellan and 245 Mount Olive Avenue, New Jersey, when he overheard a conversation spoken in Hebrew in which two persons were talking about an imminent terrorist attack upon New York City’s World Trade Center Towers that would involve airplanes. The witness reported seeing two men leaning against a wall and a third person arrive in a Lincoln Town Car. He overheard one of the men say: “The Americans will learn what it is to live with terrorists after the planes hit the twins in September.” Later, one of the men expressed a certain amount of concern regarding the upcoming presidential election between Bush/Cheney and Gore/Lieberman, which he believed might interfere with their terrorist plans. The person who arrived in the town car quelled the doubts by stating: “Don’t worry, we have people in high places and no matter who gets elected, they will take care of everything.” The witness informed U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft and the FBI of what he had overheard, but absolutely nothing was done with the information. John Ashcroft and the FBI completely ignored it for the obvious reason that Jews were implicated and not Arabs. As dedicated servants of Zionism, Ashcroft and the FBI take their orders from the Jewish Lobby, not the American people. (See: Ed Haas, “Prior knowledge of 9/11 attacks overheard in Hebrew,” Muckraker Report, Dec. 1, 2006 / “Chasing down Gomel Chesed Cemetery,” Muckraker Report, Jan. 4, 2007.)

Evidence that Israelis had been forewarned of the 9/11 attacks several hours before it happened surfaced at an Israeli instant messaging service called Odigo. The company’s headquarters were located just two blocks from the WTC in New York City, with additional offices in Herzliya, Israel, coincidentally where Mossad’s headquarters are also located. It was reported that two of Odigo’s Israel-based employees received a warning in the form of an instant message predicting the attacks would happen, but the two recipients of the warning claim not to have known the sender. (Yuval Dror, “Odigo says workers were warned of attack,” Haaretz, Sept. 26, 2001.) Odigo’s service includes a feature called ‘People Finder’ that allows users to find and contact others based on certain interests or demographics, such as Israeli nationality. The vice president of sales and marketing at Odigo, Alex Diamandis, said it was possible that the attack warning was broadcast to other Odigo members, but that the company had not received reports of other recipients of the message. (“Instant Messages To Israel Warned Of WTC Attack,” Washington Post, Sept. 28, 2001) According to Odigo, the warning did not specifically mention the WTC, but the company refused to divulge what was specified, claiming, “Providing more details would only lead to more conjecture.” (Brian McWilliams, “Odigo Clarifies Attack Messages,” Newsbytes, Sept. 28, 2001.) Is it not peculiar that Odigo refused to reveal what was said in the message fearing that the content being disclosed would lead to “conjecture”? Conjecture about what, exactly? Logically speaking, keeping something secret would elicit more “conjecture” than something that is fully disclosed to the public. If the message was non-specific, as Odigo claims, then what would they have to worry about by releasing the contents of the message to the public? Later, Alex Diamandis hinted at the contents of the message, stating, “The messages said something big was going to happen in a certain amount of time, and it did—almost to the minute.” The IP address of the sender was given to the FBI, but as usual nothing was done, and the matter was quickly forgotten. (“September 11, 2001: Two Hours Before Attacks, Israeli Company Employees Receive Warnings,” History Commons) Evidently the FBI does not investigate terrorism when Israelis or Jews are implicated. The FBI is only concerned about “terrorism” when Muslim and Arab patsies can be set up and framed so that the Zionist media can portray them as psychotic plotting villains.

Keeping this information in mind, it would be wise to broach the issue of how many Israeli citizens actually died in the 9/11 attacks and how it relates to the Odigo story as well as to other evidence that has already been detailed herein of Israeli/Jewish prior knowledge of what was to come on 9/11. One day after 9/11, The Jerusalem Post reported that 4000 Israelis were missing in the attack on the WTC and Pentagon: “The Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem has so far received the names of 4,000 Israelis believed to have been in the areas of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon at the time of the attack.” (“Hundreds of Israelis missing in WTC attack,” The Jerusalem Post, Sept. 12, 2001.) Jerusalem’s Foreign Ministry compiled the number from Israeli relatives and families who, in the first few hours after the attack, contacted the Israeli Foreign Ministry and gave the names of Israeli friends and/or relatives who worked in the WTC or who had business scheduled in it or in its adjacent buildings at the time of the attack. Considering that New York City is the capital of world Jewish financial power, with the World Trade Center as its epicenter, one would expect to find many thousands of Israeli citizens working in the WTC. So how many Israelis actually died in the Towers on 9/11? Well, if you are the gullible type you might believe the figure spouted by President George W. Bush in a speech he delivered before Congress a short time after the attacks. Bush, in his infinite wisdom, made the claim that 130 Israelis perished in the attacks. (“Transcript of President Bush’s address,” CNN, Sept. 21, 2001.) This absurd figure was later revealed to be as a gross, and most certainly deliberate, exaggeration. In reality, only five Israelis died on 9/11, two of whom were supposedly aboard two of the allegedly hijacked planes. (“Five Israeli victims remembered in capital,” The Jerusalem Post, Sept. 11, 2002.) So, in truth, only three Israelis died in the WTC Towers on 9/11, where thousands were known to have worked! This is nothing short of a statistical impossibility.

One of the Israelis who is said to have been killed on 9/11 was Daniel Lewin. The official story attests that Lewin was aboard United Airlines Flight 11 and became embroiled in a struggle with one of the ‘Muslim hijackers’ resulting in his murder. Originally the story was that Lewin was shot and killed by Satam al-Suqami with a gun, but this was later changed to being stabbed to death with a knife. This slip-up is surely not the result of confusion because it is nearly impossible to mistake a knife for a gun. Rather, it shows that the 9/11 story was being crafted around the fabricated ‘Muslim hijackers’ narrative and that the Jewish-owned press was revising the story as they saw fit. It would not be very believable to assert that the hijackers managed to smuggle a gun and ammunition on a flight, so they changed it to a knife which would have been easier to slip past security. What is most intriguing about this story is that Lewin was not your average Israeli — he was once a captain in the Israeli Occupation Army and an officer of Israel’s elite commando unit known as ‘Sayerat Matkal,’ the “world’s most elite anti-hijacking team” that specializes in aircraft takeovers and assassinations. (“Friends think Flight 11 Israeli was ‘executed,’” World Net Daily, Mar. 1, 2002.) Yehuda Schwartzberg, a childhood friend of Lewin, told World Net Daily that “Danny was an officer in a secret unit of the Israeli army called ‘sayeret matkal’… My guess is that he did something in some way to stand up against the hijackers, and was executed because of it… Anyone who knows Danny knows that it was not his nature to go down without a fight… Maybe this [FAA] (memo) shows that he died a hero.” (Ibid.) The Zionist authors behind this fictional script revealed their hand by attempting to weave a hero’s tale around this Israeli commando, presenting him as the “very first victim of 9/11.” What actually happened on Flight 11 and the three other doomed flights remains a mystery, but the unmistakable fingerprint of Zion was unveiled with the presence of Daniel Lewin, a probable Mossad agent, aboard one of the 9/11 flights.

Some of the other foreign nationals who suffered casualties on 9/11, according to Wikipedia, included 68 Brits, 47 Dominicans, 41 Indians, 28 South Koreans, 24 Japanese, 24 Canadians, 17 Colombians, 16 Mexicans, and even 14 citizens of Trinidad and Tobago. All of these foreign nations had a much higher death toll than Israel even though the WTC was primarily comprised of international finance, trade, banking and brokerage firms — the kinds of businesses where Israeli Jews are traditionally over-represented. With this in mind, it is highly probable that many Israelis, other than the two employees of Odigo, were forewarned of the attacks, which accounts for such a miniscule Israeli death toll on 9/11.

President Bush is known for his rather dull intellect and his poor grasp of the English language. With his inability to express his own thoughts coherently, it is obvious that he did not write his own speeches – he just recited them like a trained parrot. As Bush’s principal speechwriter, the man actually responsible for the gargantuan exaggeration of 130 Israeli deaths on 9/11, when it was only five, was David Frum. Frum’s obvious goal in inflating the number of Israeli casualties in the attacks was to elicit public sympathy for Israel. Frum was looking to manipulate the American people by promoting Israel as America’s new “partner” who are now united in this bogus “war on terror.” Frum injected egregious propaganda into Bush’s speech, asserting that America was attacked on 9/11 by people who merely “hate us for our freedoms.” Frum coined the Orwellian phrase “Axis of Evil” to denote a number of countries that the Zionists do not like. He co-authored a venomous book of Zionist deceit entitled, “An End To Evil: How To Win The War On Terror”, with another warmonger of the highest caliber, Richard Perle. Journalist Robert Novak exposed Frum as a raving Zionist extremist and fanatical Jewish supremacist who was transfixed by his own Jewishness, making constant reference to it. Novak noted:

“While Frum calls himself “a not especially observant Jew,” he repeatedly refers to his Jewishness. It is hard to recall any previous presidential aide so engrossed with his own ethnic roots. Frum is more uncompromising in support of Israel than any other issue, raising the inescapable question of whether this was the real reason he entered the White House.” (Axis of Ego,” The American Conservative, March 24, 2003.)

Noam Chayut, the former Israeli soldier who was interviewed by Alternate Focus, stated that an official of the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs told him that “the public opinion of the U.S. is the most powerful weapon that Israel has.” (“Burning Conscience: Israeli Soldiers Speak Out,” YouTube) Because of the 9/11 attacks world public opinion abruptly shifted from Palestinian sympathies to Israeli sympathies. As a result of 9/11, and the subsequent global Jewish media propaganda blitz to demonize and dehumanize Arabs and Muslims, World Zionism triumphed. For the past decade the Zionist regime has had a free hand to commit countless atrocities against the Palestinians, the people of Lebanon, and other Arab and Islamic peoples and nations. Jewish supremacists have utilized the momentum of 9/11 to successfully drive the USA, and other Western powers, into a litany of aggressive, illegal wars against their enemies with no end in sight.

© 2013 Zander C. Fuerza

Download the complete book HERE

Posted in Masters of Deception Book | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Masters of Deception: Chapter Three

MASTERS OF DECEPTION COVER 1CHAPTER THREE

Media Manipulation: Zionist Jews Pointing Fingers On 9/11

pointing-fingersAndreas von Bülow, a former German politician and author, pointed out that the primary motivation of the perpetrators of false-flag attacks is to bomb or assassinate for the express purpose of molding public opinion against their enemy. This is one method for terrorists to elicit public support for their political objectives. Thus a large part of the operation, besides the actual attack, is focused on shaping the media broadcasts to immediately disseminate the prescripted narrative that has been designed to turn the public against the enemies of those actually committing the atrocity. Recall Netanyahu’s serpentine pronouncement that 9/11 “swung American public opinion in [Israel's] favor,” as well as the callous remarks of Ehud Sprinzak that 9/11 from the perspective of Israeli Jews “was the most important public relations act ever committed in our favor.”

Accomplishing this task undoubtedly required an absolute death-grip on America’s media, both television and print. Only one group on earth wields the kind of influence over the American mass media that was essential to achieve this propaganda feat: Zionist Jews. To illustrate the reality of Jewish media control in America, all one has to do is quote what Jews themselves have said about it. For example, a Jewish journalist named Joel Stein wrote an article entitled “How Jewish is Hollywood?” (Los Angeles Times, Dec. 19, 2008) in which he arrogantly boasts about Jewish domination of Hollywood and the news media, stating:

“I have never been so upset by a poll in my life. Only 22% of Americans now believe “the movie and television industries are pretty much run by Jews,” down from nearly 50% in 1964. … It just shows how dumb America has gotten. Jews totally run Hollywood.

… How deeply Jewish is Hollywood? When the studio chiefs took out a full-page ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by: News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish). If either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would have not only the power to shut down all film production but to form a minyan with enough Fiji water on hand to fill a mikvah.

The Jews are so dominant, I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies. When I called them to talk about their incredible advancement, five of them refused to talk to me, apparently out of fear of insulting Jews. The sixth, AMC President Charlie Collier, turned out to be Jewish.

As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. … I don’t care if Americans think we’re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.”

hollywoodjewsBen Stein, a famous television personality of Jewish background, is rather proud that Hollywood is run lock, stock and barrel by his tribe. When the legendary actor Marlon Brando appeared on Larry King Live and said that “Hollywood is run by Jews, it’s owned by Jews,” Stein penned an article in response with the condescending title of “Do Jews Run Hollywood? You Bet They Do — And What of It?”. In the article Stein affirmed Brando’s assertion that Jews reign supreme in the entertainment business. The famed Hollywood movie director of Jewish extraction, Oliver Stone, himself said that Jews dominate the mass media in the U.S. (“Oliver Stone: Jewish control of the media is preventing free Holocaust debate,” Haaretz, July 27, 2010.) Stone was certainly in a position to know this to be true as one of Hollywood’s biggest directors, which makes his comments rather uncontestable. He was consequently pressured to apologize and retract his truthful remarks fearing that the Zionist Jews who run the media and Hollywood would destroy his career. A chauvinistic Jewish writer named Elad Nehorai authored a remarkably frank article for the Times of Israel (July 1, 2012) with the rather blunt title of “Jews DO Control The Media”. In a display of overcharged braggadocio, Nehorai gloats about Jewish control of the media, Hollywood, and the American government in a program akin to the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, and openly expressed his supremacist attitude that the Jews are a superior people who have a divine right to lead the world in a direction of their choosing.

Now, you might be thinking that Hollywood and the news media are two distinctly different things. The sad reality is that there is not much of a difference between the two industries seeing as our ‘news’ is shaped by cunning propagandists who value political expediency far above historical truth. Much of what is presented as ‘factual news’ is actually purely contrived fiction and fantasy fashioned around a political or economic agenda. John Swinton, an American journalist who lived during the 1800s, harshly criticized the thoroughly corrupted nature of his profession, stating:

“There is no such thing as an independent press. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinions out of the paper I am connected with. … The business of the journalist is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell the country for his daily bread. We are the tools and vassals of the rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.” (Richard O. Boyer and Herbert M. Morais. Labor’s Untold Story. United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America, NY, 1955/1979.)

Regardless of the slight difference between Hollywood and news industry, Jews most certainly own and control the news media too! Brother Nathanael Kapner, a former Jew who became an outspoken activist against Organized Jewry, aptly documented that Jews run much of the American mass media on his website Real Jew News. In his April 11, 2010, article “Who Owns The Media?”, Brother Nathanael made note of the small army of Zionist Jews sitting atop America’s major media companies. Some of these Jewish media barons include:

… Jeff Zucker, a Jew, was appointed the CEO of NBC Universal, of which, Comcast is now in charge. The owner of Comcast is the Jew, Brian Roberts, whose supporting staff includes a host of Jewish media functionaries. The Executives of NBC Universal, now a division of Comcast, is also, like its parent company, predominated by a cadre of Jews.

Sumner Redstone — a Jew, born Murray Rothstein — took controlling interest in Westinghouse Broadcasting’s CBC television. The merger between Redstone’s Viacom and Westinghouse Broadcasting’s CBS network installed a new Board of Directors at CBS, mostly Jews, with Redstone as Chairman. Redstone, probably the richest man in America, is currently the Chairman of both CBS Corporation and Viacom.

Rounding out the list of Jewish media moguls, we find Jews in HIGH propaganda places, such as: ABC, CNN, Newsweek, Time, Washington Post, NY Times, Wall Street Journal, and US News & World Report.

ABC is owned by the Walt Disney Company, with the Jew, Robert Iger, installed as President. Sidney Bass, a Jew, along with his brothers, are the largest shareholders of The Walt Disney Company. CNN is a holding of Time-Warner, of which, the Jewish Bronfman family has controlling interest. Time Magazine is also owned by Bronfmans’ Time Warner Corporation. Newsweek and the Washington Post are owned by the Eugene Isaac Meyer “Graham” family. … Rupert Murdoch, a full-fledged Zionist, whose origins are Jewish, is the owner of News Corporation, whose holdings include the Fox News Channel and the Wall Street Journal.

The New York Times is owned by the powerful Jewish Sulzberger family, the major influence behind Columbia University. Arthur Sulzberger Jr is the current Chairman of the newspaper. US News & World Report is owned by the real estate mogul, Mortimer Zuckerman….”

In another article detailing the Jewish ownership of the news media, Brother Nathanael informs us that in addition to national news outlets, Jews have completely taken over most of the ‘local’ newspapers of America! Writing in “Newhouse Family: A Zionist Media Empire” (Real Jew News, June 19, 2008), Kapner observed that,

“Jews have taken over the “local newspaper” in America. One might think that because of the large number of local newspapers across America a safeguard against Jewish control would be in place. However most “local newspapers” are owned by companies controlled by Jews whose offices are hundreds of miles away. The Newhouse Empire of the Jewish brothers Samuel, Donald, & Theodore Neuhaus (surname changed to Newhouse) illustrates the insatiable appetite that Zionists have for opinion control. Today the Newhouse Empire, under the parent corporation of Advance Publications, (owned by descendents of Samuel & Donald Newhouse), owns 40 “local newspapers” across the USA. These include the Newark Star Ledger, the Cleveland Plain Dealer, & the Portland Oregonian.”

Author Texe Marrs writing in his exposé of Jewish media influence entitled “Do the Jews Own Hollywood and the Media?” noted:

“And who, pray tell, is the current owner of the Tribune Company [which owns 23 television stations, a baseball team, and many major newspapers, including the Chicago Tribune and the Los Angeles Times]? Why, that would be Jewish billionaire Sam Zell. Zell is a major donor to Israeli, Zionist and Jewish causes. His own rabbi proudly reports that Zell is ‘a committed Zionist, a generous supporter of Israel, and a member in good standing of the synagogue.’”

It is vital to highlight who owns the media because the media played an important role in the function of propagating the official 9/11 script to an extremely dumbed-down and credulous American public. Undeniably, Jews own and control America’s media — both television and print — essentially forming a pervasive media monopoly in the most powerful nation on earth. This explains why the media is so slanted in favor of Jews and Israel, and so brutally biased against the historical and present-day adversaries of Jewish supremacism. Through this death-grip on the press and television news industry, Zionist Jews promulgated a series of lies, distortions and falsehoods that were intended to mislead the American people — and the people of the world for that matter — about the true nature of the events of 9/11 and the actual culprits behind them. Within the mainstream media broadcasts on the very day and evening of the September 11 attacks, we find plenty of substantial clues that are strongly suggestive as to who the true authors of this conspiracy really were. The former Pakistani spy chief Hamid Gul eloquently explained that,

“Within 10 minutes of the second twin tower being hit in the World Trade Center CNN said Osama bin Laden had done it. That was a planned piece of disinformation by the real perpetrators. It created an instant mindset and put public opinion into a trance, which prevented even intelligent people from thinking for themselves.” (United Press International, Sept. 26, 2001.)

On 9/11, in what was assuredly a pre-scripted propaganda campaign designed to hypnotize and mesmerize the American people, mainstream media talking heads across all the major networks were — in unison — chanting the name “Osama bin Laden” over and over again. The time-tested technique of repetition was utilized expertly by the Jewish media to reduce the masses of America into a trance-like state of abject gullibility. Soon enough, the sleeping masses of America would be repeating — like parrots — the name of “Osama bin Laden” and “Al-Qaeda”. Within a few days of 9/11 the media whipped up such a lunatic frenzy with their relentless propaganda onslaught against bin Laden that a majority of Americans were already hungrily demanding that revenge be exacted upon the entire Muslim world.

When individuals frivolously point their finger at others, loudly and aggressively making accusations and casting blame in every direction other than on to themselves, it is usually because they are guilty of something and are trying to project their own guilt onto someone else. This is precisely what Jewish supremacists did on 9/11 and what they have always done in the past. Thus, it should come as no surprise to the reader that the first individual to point the finger at Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda as the parties responsible for what happened on 9/11 was none other than Ehud Barak, a prominent member of Israel’s government and military establishment since the very early days of the Zionist state.

EHUD-BARAK-BBCOn the morning of the September 11 attacks, very shortly after the Twin Towers had collapsed, Barak appeared in person at the BBC’s London studio where he proceeded to present a narrative to the public. The core message of this Israeli war criminal was that Osama bin Laden is responsible for the attacks and that a “global war on terror,” led by the United States, must be launched in response to it. Specifically, Barak said:

“The world will not be the same from today on, it’s an attack against our whole civilization…. if it is the kind of Bin Laden organization, even if it’s something else, I believe that this is the time to deploy a globally concerted effort led by the United States, UK, Europe and Russia, against all sources of terror. …

It’s going to be a tough struggle. There will be many tough and painful moments along the way, but I believe that if we will coordinate diplomatic, operational, intelligence and economic activities that will not let them land at any airport and will isolate automatically any nation that is ready to host terror or support them. And by doing this consistently along six or ten years we will reduce automatically this challenge to our whole way of life… We have no way but to stand firm facing terror otherwise all our way of life will be threatened. …

And to stand firm means to isolate from the world every nation that is hosting them and calling every terror thug with the accurate name and be ready with all the pain that comes with it, to act upon our observations. … It’s time for action, facing such as attack we cannot but act and these terror thugs and rogue leaders are highly skillful in identifying the slightest cracks in the power of will in the leaders of the free world. … It’s a time to launch an operational, complete war against terror even if it takes certain pains from the routine activities of our normal society. … I believe that the world intelligence community in a concerted effort can identify within few months the sources of this terror. It can identify the places where they are deployed on earth. Every such a place within certain country. The, ehh, Bin Laden sits in Afghanistan[We should act pre-emptively against] five states, they are Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea… these kind of states should be treated as rogue states.” (“A chief architect of 9-11, Ehud Barak, interviewed on BBC an hour after attacks,” YouTube)

911-SHARON-WAR-ON-TERROR-CNNImmediately assigning blame to your enemy is a tell-tale sign of a false-flag in action. Lo and behold, later in the day another Israeli war criminal would duplicate Barak’s finger pointing initiative. Israel’s Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, who described 9/11 as a “Hanukkah miracle” for his rogue nation, held a press conference on 9/11 in which he too blamed Islamists for the assault and called for an “international war on terror,” stating:

“The war against terror is an international war. A war of a coalition of the free world against all of the terror groups…This is a war between the good and the bad, between humanity and those who are bloodthirsty. The criminal attack today on innocent civilians in the United States, is a turning point in war against international terror. Even if the war against terror is long and even if the terror will try to raise its head again there won’t be any room in the world in which terrorists, their assistants and those who send them to be able to find a shelter or a refuge… The fight against terror is an international struggle of the free world against the forces of darkness who seek to destroy our liberty and our way of life. I believe that together we can defeat these forces of evil…” (“9/11 Ariel Sharon “Turning Point on Terror” Press Conference 5:00 pm,” YouTube)

On 9/11, the BBC aired an evening program called Newsnight which featured as commentators Ehud Barak in the studio and Jewish neocon kingpin Richard Perle on the phone. During the broadcast Barak and Perle unleashed a carefully choreographed Zionist propaganda blitz, brazenly outlining their Jewish war agenda by forcefully advocating American military strikes against Iraq, Iran, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, Hezbollah and Hamas — coincidentally all of whom are enemies of Israel and World Zionism! These Zionist ideologues made it a point to stress that the “states that sponsor terrorism” must be dealt with by brute force. (See: “BBC – Zionists pointing fingers on 911,” YouTube) The two greatest state-sponsors of terror, Israel and the United States, were strangely absent from their bogus list of nations that supposedly “sponsor terrorism.” On September 12, 2001, The Jerusalem Post quoted Israeli Likud zealot Benjamin Netanyahu as stating that the Palestinian Authority should be considered an “enemy” — not only of Israel but the entire world! Netanyahu also added that the so-called ‘international community’ (i.e., nations who serve Jewish interests) should join forces with Israel to wipe out all groups and nations in the Middle East that Netanyahu has deemed an “enemy.” (“Netanyahu: Designate PA ‘enemy’,” The Jerusalem Post, Sept. 12, 2001.) Netanyahu firmly believes that the Jews are destined to rule the world, and thus an enemy of the Jews is an enemy of the world in his twisted Talmudic mind. A video from 1990 features Netanyahu meeting and speaking with Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the revered Jewish supremacist “Lubavitcher Rebbe,” who pleads with Netanyahu to hasten the coming of the Jewish “King Messiah.” (“Benjamin Netanyahu Ordered to Hasten Jewish Messiah’s Coming,” YouTube) Netanyahu agreed to Schneerson’s delusional demands, and plans to do this by creating cataclysmic events like 9/11 and blaming them on the enemies of Jewry.

In another media broadcast on the morning of 9/11, a truly mind-boggling exchange took place between a Zionist Jew named Jerome Hauer and CBS’s Dan Rather. The Orwellian implications of Hauer’s statements are difficult to describe in words, but for the sake of brevity let’s just call this interview “self-incriminating” to say the least. The conversation went as follows:

Dan Rather: Based on what you know, and I recognize we’re dealing with so few facts, is it possible that just a plane crash could have collapsed these buildings, or would it have required the, sort of, prior positioning of other explosives in the, uh, in the buildings? I mean, what do you think?

Jerome Hauer: No, I, uh, my sense is just the velocity of the plane and the fact that you have a plane filled with fuel hitting that building, uh, that burned, uh, the velocity of that plane, uh, certainly, uh, uh, had an impact on the structure itself, and then the fact that it burned and you had that intense heat, uh, probably weakened the structure as well, uh, and I think it, uh, was, uh, simply the, uh, the planes hitting the buildings…causing the collapse.

Dan Rather: What perspective can you give us? I mean, there have been these repeated reports that, well, yes, Osama Bin Laden, but some think he’s been over-emphasized as, as responsible for these kinds of events. I know many intelligence, uh, people at very high levels who say, listen, you can’t have these kinds of attacks without having some state, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Syria, somebody involved. Put that into perspective for us.

Jerome Hauer: Yeah, well I’m not sure I agree that, umm, this is necessarily state-sponsored. Umm, it, as I mentioned earlier, certainly has, umm, the, uh, fingerprints of somebody like Bin Laden.

(See: “Meet Jerome Hauer, 9/11 Suspect Awaiting Indictment,” Winter Patriot Blogspot, Feb. 26, 2007 / “The 9-11 Solution -How the myth was sold,” YouTube)

As the reader has just witnessed, Jerome Hauer went on national television trying to convince Dan Rather, and the rest of us, that the intense heat from the jet-fuel fires and the impact of the planes had magically caused the free-fall collapses of the towers — forcefully ruling out the possibility of explosives. Moreover, he asserted without any evidence whatsoever that the attack had the “fingerprints of somebody like Bin Laden.” Hauer promulgated what would become the entire official cover story of 9/11 on the day that it happened! Perhaps he knew all of this because he penned the official script himself with his Zionist colleagues Barak, Sharon and Perle? After observing these Orwellian pronouncements one after the other, their significance cannot escape an intelligent person. These four Jewish criminal personalities laid bare on national television the entire Zionist agenda for war and destruction in the Middle East. Callously calling for a “war on terror” and the decimation of the Islamic world, this team of Israeli imperialists got ahead of themselves, giving away their malignant intent to manipulate and deceive. As these revealing quotations illustrate with such overt clarity, the sordid Zionist snakes who uttered these heinous words and phrases are the originators and progenitors of the colossal scam known to the world as the “war on terror,” not George W. Bush or Dick Cheney, who merely served as window dressing for the Jewish crime network running the show from behind the curtain.

However, neither Ehud Barak nor Ariel Sharon was the first to employ the term ‘war on terror.’ That Orwellian phrase was originally coined in the 1980s by their partner in crime Benjamin Netanyahu — the leader of Israel’s ruling Likud Party, which is literally the birth child of the infamous 1940s Jewish terror gang known as the Irgun. In 1987, Netanyahu published a book titled “Terrorism: How the West Can Win” containing a number of essays and transcribed speeches from like-minded Jewish-Zionist gangsters which outlined a political blueprint for a global campaign — led by the “Western democracies” — of relentless pre-emptive warfare against anyone that the Jewish supremacists label as “terrorists.” A “terrorist” is Zionist code-speak for non-Jews who resist Jewish terrorism, Zionist supremacy and the “Greater Israel” project. If you resist the Jewish theft of your land, you’re a “terrorist.” If you resist the Jewish takeover of your country, you’re a “terrorist.” If you resist the Jewish slaughter of your people, you’re a “terrorist.” If you resist the Jewish control of your media, government and banking system, you’re a “terrorist.” If you resist total Jewish supremacy, you’re a “terrorist.” This is what occurs when we let Jewish supremacists define terms for us. The sadistic Jewish policy of physically exterminating their enemies in the Middle East, under the flaccid veneer of “fighting terrorism,” became the USA’s official foreign policy after 9/11, as the attack was intended to accomplish.

This coalition of Jewish-Zionist psychopaths, conspicuously eager to place blame on Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda, were exposed for the loathsome liars and dreadful deceivers that they are by bin Laden himself! In an interview with the Pakistani daily Ummat, published in Karachi on September 28, 2001, bin Laden categorically denied having anything to do with the 9/11 attacks. He went on to allege that a Jewish-Zionist terror network operating at the highest levels of the governments of Israel and the U.S. were the true culprits, and intimated that Zionist Jews rule America using it as a proxy force to make slaves out of countries that are not subservient to Zionism and the Jewish financial elite. Here are a few excerpts from the interview:

Ummat: You have been accused of involvement in the attacks in New York and Washington. What do you want to say about this? If you are not involved, who might be?

Osama bin Laden: … I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children, and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children, and other people.

… Such a practice is forbidden ever in the course of a battle. It is the United States, which is perpetrating every maltreatment on women, children, and common people of other faiths, particularly the followers of Islam. All that is going on in Palestine for the last 11 months is sufficient to call the wrath of God upon the United States and Israel.

The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; the people who are a part of the US system, but are dissenting against it. Or those who are working for some other system; persons who want to make the present century as a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity so that their own civilization, nation, country, or ideology could survive. …Then you cannot forget the American Jews, who are annoyed with President Bush ever since the elections in Florida and want to avenge him.

Then there are intelligence agencies in the US, which require billions of dollars worth of funds from the Congress and the government every year. This funding issue was not a big problem till the existence of the former Soviet Union but after that the budget of these agencies has been in danger.

They needed an enemy. So, they first started propaganda against Usamah and Taleban and then this incident happened. You see, the Bush administration approved a budget of 40bn dollars. Where will this huge amount go? It will be provided to the same agencies, which need huge funds and want to exert their importance. Now they will spend the money for their expansion and for increasing their importance.

I will give you an example. Drug smugglers from all over the world are in contact with the US secret agencies. These agencies do not want to eradicate narcotics cultivation and trafficking because their importance will be diminished. The people in the US Drug Enforcement Department are encouraging drug trade so that they could show performance and get millions of dollars worth of budget. General Noriega was made a drug baron by the CIA and, in need, he was made a scapegoat. In the same way, whether it is President Bush or any other US president, they cannot bring Israel to justice for its human rights abuses or to hold it accountable for such crimes. What is this? Is it not that there exists a government within the government in the United States? That secret government must be asked as to who made the attacks.

Ummat: The losses caused in the attacks in New York and Washington have proved that giving an economic blow to the US is not too difficult. US experts admit that a few more such attacks can bring down the American economy. Why is al-Qa’idah not targeting their economic pillars?

OBL: I have already said that we are not hostile to the United States. We are against the system, which makes other nations slaves of the United States, or forces them to mortgage their political and economic freedom. This system is totally in control of the American Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States. It is simply that the American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced to live according to the principles and laws laid by them. So, the punishment should reach Israel. In fact, it is Israel, which is giving a blood bath to innocent Muslims and the US is not uttering a single word. (“Interview with Osama bin Laden. Denies his Involvement in 9/11,” Global Research, May 9, 2011.)

Amazingly, the true executors of 9/11 revealed themselves in the media broadcasts where one sees Zionist Jews standing in the foreground as instigators, rabble-rousers and slave-drivers! These pathologically insane calls for global conflict and upheaval trumpeted by the Jewish masters of deception Ariel Sharon, Ehud Barak and Richard Perle, on 9/11, is reminiscent of the psychotic Jewish campaign to plunge Western nations into war against their nemesis Adolf Hitler and National Socialist Germany beginning in 1933, when Organized Jewry initiated their “Holy War” against the Third Reich. (See: “THE JEWS DECLARE WAR ON GERMANY (1933),” Guardian 150m Website) Unconcerned with the incalculable loss of human life, Jewish supremacists have consistently instigated wars and conflicts around the world when it has suited their interests.

© 2013 Zander C. Fuerza

Download the complete book HERE

Posted in Masters of Deception Book | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Masters of Deception: Chapter Two

MASTERS OF DECEPTION COVER 1CHAPTER TWO

Cui Bono — Who Benefits?

netanyahu-towersThe foremost question that must always be asked following an event of huge historical importance is: “who benefits from this?” The answer to that question with regard to 9/11 emerged the following day from the lips of the fanatical Zionist Jew who heads Israel’s militant Likud Party, Benjamin Netanyahu. The New York Times published an article on September 12, 2001, with the revealing title, A DAY OF TERROR: THE ISRAELIS; Spilled Blood Seen as Bond That Draws Two Nations Closer, which reported:

“Israelis took cold comfort in concluding that Americans now share more of their fears. … Israeli leaders, who chafed at American criticism of their measures against Palestinians, said the day’s attacks would awaken the United States to the threat of global terrorism.”

The article further reported that when asked what the attack meant for U.S.-Israeli relations, Netanyahu joyfully proclaimed: “It’s very good…Well it’s not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy [for Israel's cause].” Netanyahu then predicted that the attack would “strengthen the bond between our two peoples, because we’ve experienced terror over so many decades, but the United States has now experienced a massive hemorrhaging of terror.” Years later, Netanyahu continued to boast mockingly about how beneficial the attacks were for Israel and its war against the Palestinians and the Arab world in general. Israel’s Haaretz newspaper quoted the cold-blooded Israeli leader as having sadistically said: “We [Israelis] are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq… [The 9/11 attacks] swung American public opinion in our favor.” (“Report: Netanyahu Says 9/11 Terror Attacks Good for Israel,” Haaretz, April 16, 2008.) Israel’s Prime Minister on 9/11 was the former Haganah terrorist, Ariel Sharon. Shortly after the attacks, the infamous war criminal and his terrorist colleagues in the Israeli military-intelligence establishment were overjoyed, concluding that the events of 9/11 were nothing less than a “Hanukkah miracle” of good fortune for Israel. Israeli journalist Aluf Benn described the jubilant reaction of Israel’s political and military leadership to 9/11, writing:

“The Israeli political-security establishment is coming to the conclusion that the terror attacks on September 11 were a kind of “Hanukkah miracle” for Israel, coming just as Israel was under increasing international pressure because of the ongoing conflict with the Palestinians.

Osama bin Laden’s September 11 attacks placed Israel firmly on the right side of the strategic map with the U.S., and put the Arab world at a disadvantage as it now faces its own difficult decisions about its future. That’s the impression left by the speeches given by Mossad chief Ephraim Halevy and National Security Council chairman Maj. Gen. Uzi Dayan, at this week’s Herzliya conference on national security.

Dayan said yesterday that the global reality resulting from September 11 gives Israel and the U.S. “the chance for victory over a common enemy.” Halevy spoke about “a world war different from all its predecessors” and about global agreement that “combined all the elements of Islamic terror into one clear and identifiable format,” creating ‘a genuine dilemma for every ruler and every state in our region. Each one must reach a moment of truth and decide how he will position himself in the campaign.’” (“Israel Strives to Import America’s War on Terror,” Haaretz, Dec. 18, 2001.)

SHARON DAGAN HALEVYOpen celebration of the September 11 mass murder was commonplace among Israel’s leaders. This was even confirmed by a former high-ranking Israeli Intelligence official. In an interview with the French daily Le Monde, Ami Ayalon, the former chief of Israel’s internal security service Shabak, or Shin Bet, from 1996-2000, informed us that “[s]ince September 11, our leaders have been euphoric. With no more international pressures on Israel, they think, the way is open.” (“An unconditional withdrawal from the territories is urgently needed,” Le Monde, Dec. 22, 2001.) Israel’s leading “academics” were also jumping for joy. Ehud Sprinzak, a prominent Israeli professor who specializes in the subject of terrorism, boastfully announced: “From the perspective of the Jews, it [9/11] is the most important public relations act ever committed in our favour.” (Alan Philips, “Lost Sympathy Worries Arafat,” The Telegraph, Sept. 13, 2001.) The picture here couldn’t really get any clearer: the Jewish supremacist elite benefited tremendously from the 9/11 attacks. 9/11 was an Israeli victory – this reality was articulated by Israel’s leaders with exuberant grins on their faces.

Reveling over the deaths of nearly three thousand innocents reveals that these hardened Jewish psychopaths are infected with a supremacist and inhuman mindset. Considering that Judaism teaches its adherents of the inferiority of non-Jews (the Goyim), who are said to be worthless cattle whose only purpose on earth is to serve the Jews as slaves, it is hardly surprising to see Jewish supremacists celebrate murder and death when it benefits their agenda. Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, the spiritual leader of Israel’s third largest political party “Shas,” obnoxiously articulated this supremacist view in a sermon that he delivered in 2010, blurting out:

“Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel. … In Israel, death has no dominion over them… With gentiles, it will be like any person – they need to die, but [God] will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one’s donkey would die, they’d lose their money. This is his servant… That’s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew. …Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat. That is why gentiles were created.” (“Yosef: Gentiles exist only to serve Jews,” The Jerusalem Post, Oct. 18, 2010.)

Rabbi Yosef did not really say anything out of the ordinary. He was merely expressing the supremacist doctrines of his insidious religion – a set of abhorrent principles that all devoted religious Jews adhere to. (Christopher Jon Bjerknes, “The Universal Enslavement of the Non-Jew, Part 2: Jewish Supremacism in the Torah Proper,” Jewish Racism Blogspot, Dec. 6, 2008.) This kind of rhetoric is prevalent among World Jewry’s most revered rabbis and sages. Take, for instance, Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liadi (1745-1812), the founder of the extremist Jewish sect “Chabad Lubavitch,” who said: “Gentile souls are of a completely different and inferior order. They are totally evil, with no redeeming qualities whatsoever… All Jews are innately good, all Gentiles are innately evil.” (Foxbrunner, A. Roman. Habad: the Hasidism of R. Shneur Zalman of Lyady. University of Alabama Press, 1992, p. 108) Rabbi Kook the Elder, a prominent and revered fundamentalist Jewish spiritual leader, proclaimed: “The difference between a Jewish soul and souls of non-Jews—all of them in all different levels—is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the souls of cattle.” (Shahak, Israel & Mezvinsky, Norman. Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel. London: Pluto Press, 1999, p. 176)

The mass murder of non-Jews is enthusiastically celebrated by Jews every year in their ludicrous revenge holiday of Purim – a commemoration of the massacre of 75,000 Persians which Jews organized several thousand years ago, according to the book of Esther in the Old Testament. During the festival of Purim, Jews prepare triangular baked pockets and chopped meat which represents the ears and beaten flesh of Haman, the ancient Persian Prime Minister who had fallen victim to Jewish terrorism. All of this symbolizes Jewish revenge upon their perceived enemies. (See: David Duke’s videos “The Purim Celebration of Hate” and “Purim II Promoting Genocide”) It shouldn’t come as a surprise that Manis Friedman, a leading Chabad rabbi, flagrantly advocated the slaughter of non-Jews like cattle, including women and children. He coldly stated that “[t]he only way to fight a moral war is the Jewish way: Destroy their holy sites. Kill men, women and children (and cattle).” (“Chabad rabbi: Jews should kill Arab men, women and children during war,” Haaretz, June 9, 2009.) Another prominent rabbi in Israel, Yitzhak Shapira, published a book entitled The King’s Torah which has been described as “230 pages on the laws concerning the killing of non-Jews, a kind of guidebook for anyone who ponders the question of it and when it is permissible to take the life of a non-Jew.” In the book, Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira says:

“Non-Jews are uncompassionate by nature,” and should be killed in order to, “curb their evil inclinations. …If we kill a gentile who has violated one of the seven commandments… there is nothing wrong with the murder. … There is justification for killing babies if it is clear that they will grow up to harm us, and in such a situation they may be harmed deliberately, and not only during combat with adults.” (Max Blumenthal, “How to Kill Goyim and Influence People: Israeli Rabbis Defend Book’s Shocking Religious Defense of Killing Non-Jews,” Alternet, Aug. 30, 2010.)

Killing non-Jews is, of course, advocated in the Babylonian Talmud which commands the slaying of “the best of the Gentiles.” (Michael Hoffman, “The Truth About the Talmud,” Revisionist History) The aforementioned rabbi, Ovadia Yosef, publicly announced his bloodthirsty dreams of genocide when he called for the annihilation of all Arabs, stating that “[i]t is forbidden to be merciful to them. You must send missiles to them and annihilate them… The Lord shall return the Arabs’ deeds on their own heads, waste their seed and exterminate them, devastate them and vanish them from this world!” (“Rabbi Calls for Annihilation of Arabs,” BBC News, April 10, 2001.) Another supremacist rabbi, Yaacov Perrin, once said, “One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.” (NY Daily News, Feb. 28, 1994, p.6)

These disturbing Jewish quotes will be shocking to many reading this considering that they are never, ever publicized by the Jewish-occupied media of the West. It is of the utmost importance to shine a light on the demented things that these Jewish supremacists have said openly in order to delineate the ruthless mindset and ethnic supremacy of many Jews, most especially Jewish leaders, who care nothing for innocent human life if it is non-Jewish. This all goes to show that an attack on the USA (blamed on Arabs) was very much welcomed and desired by many powerful Jews in Israel and America, as it served to benefit and advance their pernicious agenda of war and destruction exponentially.

© 2013 Zander C. Fuerza

Download the complete book HERE

Posted in Masters of Deception Book | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments