The Neocons and the Holocaust®: Zionism’s Big Lie
Besides Al-Qaeda’s purported sponsorship of 9/11 and Saddam’s alleged “Weapons of Mass Destruction,” the neocons were intoxicated with a third monstrous myth: the holocaust story. Many of the most prominent Jewish neocons have acknowledged that their belief in the holocaust story lies at the very foundation of their Zionist fanaticism and lust for war with the perceived enemies of the Jews and Israel. Gal Beckerman, writing for the Jewish Forward, made note of the “holocaust consciousness” that enshrouds the thinking and worldview of Jewish neocons, writing:
“It was [Norman] Podhoretz, however, who gave neoconservatism its most explicitly Jewish cast. The August 1968 issue of Commentary featured Emil Fackenheim’s famous essay, “Jewish Faith and the Holocaust: A Fragment,” which included Fackenheim’s contention that after Auschwitz, Jews had a moral responsibility to defend Jewish interests so as not to hand Hitler a “posthumous victory.” By February 1972, Podhoretz himself wrote a piece titled, without irony, “Is It Good for the Jews?”
Holocaust consciousness was growing in the 1970s, as was a renewed sense of threat to Jews and a feeling that, as Podhoretz put it, the postwar “statute of limitations” on antisemitism had run out. Israel’s security, threatened in the Six Day War and the Yom Kippur War — both events that gave Jews existential pause — suddenly became a top American Jewish concern. Podhoretz came to identify more and more with the defense of Jews, and by the 1980s, half his articles on international affairs focused on Israel and threats to the Jewish people.” (“The Neoconservative Persuasion: Examining the Jewish roots of an intellectual movement,” The Forward, Jan. 06, 2006.)
The three prime engineers of the war in Iraq — Douglas Feith, Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz — have all conceded that it is the holocaust story that constitutes the engine that drives their calamitous policies of aggressive warfare. Speaking about what motivates his views on foreign policy, Richard Perle said:
“For those of us who are involved in foreign and defense policy today of my generation, the defining moment of our history was certainly the holocaust. It was destruction, a genocide of a whole people, and it was the failure to respond in a timely fashion to a threat that was clearly gathering. We don’t want that to happen again. When we have the ability to stop totalitarian regimes we should do so because when we fail to do so the results are catastrophic.” (“The War Party,” BBC)
A New York Times piece on Paul Wolfowitz noted his status as “one of Israel’s staunchest allies in the [Bush] administration” and explained that his worldview was,
“forged by family history… Brooklyn-born and raised in Ithaca, N.Y., Mr. Wolfowitz, 58, is the son of a Cornell University mathematician who escaped Poland after World War I. The rest of his father’s family perished in the Holocaust. ‘That sense of what happened in Europe in World War II has shaped a lot of my views,’ he said.” (Eric Schmitt, “The Busy Life of Being a Lightning Rod for Bush,” New York Times, April 22, 2002.)
Douglas Feith furnished some autobiographical material to explain why he is such a fervent promoter of war and death, telling journalist Jeffrey Goldberg:
“I had done a lot of reading, relative for a kid, about World War Two, and I thought about Chamberlain a lot. Chamberlain wasn’t popular in my house. What I was hearing from the antiwar movement, with which I had a fair amount of sympathy . . . were thoughts about how the world works, how war is not the answer. I mean, the idea that we could have peace no matter what anybody else in the world does didn’t make sense to me. It’s a solipsism. When I took all these nice-sounding ideas and compared it to my own little personal ‘Cogito, ergo sum,’ which was my understanding that my family got wiped out by Hitler, and that all this stuff about working things out-well, talking to Hitler to resolve the problem didn’t make any sense to me. The kind of people who put bumper stickers on their car that declare that ‘war is not the answer,’ are they making a serious comment? What’s the answer to Pearl Harbor? What’s the answer to the Holocaust? The surprising thing is not that there are so many Jews who are neocons but that there are so many who are not.” (“A Little Learning: What Douglas Feith knew, and when he knew it.,” The New Yorker, May 9, 2005.)
Expressing a deep hatred of gentiles and a desire to exterminate anyone who gets in the way of Jewish group interests, these three Zionist warmongers invoke nonsensical justifications in defense of their evil policies. The argument that they seem to be making, is that since some of their family members perished during the Second World War — along with the over 60 million others who also died in the war — a war instigated by the Jewish elite themselves — they now feel that they have an obligation to crush any possible ‘threat’ to Jewish world hegemony. Neocon crime boss Michael Ledeen also acknowledged the centrality of the holocaust story to his views. In an article entitled “The New Holocaust” (PJ Media, Dec. 22, 2010.) Ledeen writes that he has “spent a lot of time interviewing Holocaust survivors” and goes on to propagate the flaccid falsehood that:
“…unlike most of the Holocaust, the slaughter of contemporary Jews is not carried out in antiseptic gas chambers, but in the streets, markets, restaurants, airports, and skyscrapers of the modern world. These killers do not have the comforting distance that Nazi technology placed between killers and martyrs. The jihadis think of themselves as individual assassins, not deranged industrial managers, as did so many of Hitler’s men.”
Bradley Smith, the founder of the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust (CODOH), opined that this neocon obsession with, and blind belief in, the holocaust dogma of German WMD – the myth of the gas chambers – is what lies behind their sinister policies of open-ended aggression against the entire Arab and Muslim world, with the intention of bolstering Israeli military and economic supremacy in the Middle East. Smith writes:
“We are left to imagine how this uninformed (I choose to trust that Wolfowitz is not willfully ignoring revisionist work on the gas chamber fraud) view of what happened between Germans and Jews during World War II influences how he morally justifies the creation of a Jewish state on Muslim land in the Middle East, the ensuing US alliance with Israel, and the war against Iraq which helps to secure Israel as a homeland for Jews, in the short run.” (“Paul Wolfowitz: the Blind Leading the Blind,” Outlaw History Newsletter, Nov. 23, 2004.)
The official account of the ‘holocaust’ is divorced from reality on a multitude of levels. The veracity of the claims made about ‘homicidal gas chambers’ in German concentration camps during the Second World War has been scientifically debunked by chemists and engineers such as Fred Leuchter, Germar Rudolf, Dr. William B. Lindsey and Walter Lüftl. The orthodox holocaust story has been cut to pieces by rigorous analysis and research done by revisionist scholars such as Ernst Zündel, Robert Faurisson, Arthur Butz, Mark Weber, Fredrick Töben, Carlo Mattogno, Jürgen Graf, Bradley Smith, David Cole and many others (whose works can be read for free online at VHO.org). Raul Hilberg, a leading holocaust dogmatist, was obliged to confess on the witness stand at the Toronto kangaroo court of the first Ernst Zündel trial in 1985 that there is neither documentary evidence nor any scientific proof of the holocaust. (“No scientific proof Jews exterminated: witness,” The Montreal Gazette, Jan. 18, 1985.) The French Emperor Napoleon wisely said that authorized history is merely a made-up fable agreed upon by the victors of any battle or war. Thus the professional deceivers calling themselves neoconservatives are not only upholding old lies that were used to justify the Zionist seizure of Arab land, but are continually concocting new lies with which to sucker Westerners into fighting more wars of aggression to secure the Zionist dream.
At the root of the holocaust deception lies the Zionist desire to conquer what was Arab-held Palestine and form a Jewish ‘homeland’ in its place. This nefarious Zionist conspiracy was articulated in plain English by a prominent American-Jewish rabbi named Stephen S. Wise, an influential adviser to numerous U.S. Presidents, including Woodrow Wilson and Franklin D. Roosevelt. In 1900 — fourteen years before World War One and thirty-nine years before World War Two — rabbi Wise spoke of “6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism,” unveiling the kabbalistic ‘6,000,000’ figure in the context of a Zionist public relations effort to use perceived persecution of Jews as a way of garnering world sympathy for the creation of a Jewish state. (“ZIONISTS’ MASS MEETING: Rabbi Wise’s Address,” New York Times, June 11, 1900.) The grand exaggerations and fabrications of the holocaust story are indeed a critical component of this whole narrative, but the intricacies of the holocaust fraud is a subject for another book. Considering the vastness of the subject, I will simply mention a few examples of the previous attempts by Jews to submerge unsuspecting non-Jewish populations underneath a tidal wave of Jewish persecution stories, invoking the kabbalistic ‘six million’ figure with an obsessive, religious passion. This was usually done as an attempt to divert the world’s attention away from Jewish-inflicted atrocities, like the heinous murders that were being perpetrated by Jewish Bolsheviks in Russia and elsewhere in Europe. It was also intended to elicit public sympathy and support for Jewish political causes, primarily Zionism. Here are a few examples:
1) In 1902, the tenth edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica references “six million Jews” of Rumania and Russia being “systematically degraded.”
2) In 1905, the New York Times released a report on the social situation of the Jews in Russia, claiming that, “From 1890 to 1902 he [Constantine Petrovich Pobiedonostizeff] caused 6,000,000 Jewish families to be expelled from Russia.” (“POBIEDONOSTIZEFF RESIGNS.,” New York Times, Nov. 1, 1905.)
3) In 1906, a German-Jewish publicist named Dr. Paul Nathan disseminated claims about the mistreatment of “6,000,000 Jews” in Russia, alleging that the Russian government had set in motion a “solution to the Jewish question” which amounted to a policy of “systematic… murderous extermination.” (“Dr. Paul Natan’s View of Russian Massacre,” New York Times, Mar. 25, 1906.)
4) In 1910, the American Jewish Committee’s annual report claimed that since the year 1890 Russia “adopted a deliberate plan to expel or exterminate” 6,000,000 Jews. (“The American Jewish Yearbook,” American Jewish Committee, Sept. 23 1911 to Sept. 11 1912, p. 15.)
5) In 1911, at the tenth Zionist Congress in Basle, Switzerland, the co-founder of the World Zionist Organization Max Nordau made a startling prediction that “6,000,000 Jews” would soon be annihilated by European governments. (Hecht, Ben. Perfidy. New York: Messner, 1961. p. 254.)
6) In 1914, the New York Times made reference to “6,000,000 Jews” in the context of being in danger of becoming consumed in the ensuing world war. (“Appeal For Aid For Jews,” New York Times, Dec. 2, 1914.)
7) In 1915, about a year into World War One, Jewish leader Louis Marshall makes a dire proclamation alleging that the lives of “6,000,000 Jews” are at stake and that they are being “subjected to every manner of suffering and sorrow.” (“Jews’ Indifference to War Aid Rebuked,” New York Times, Jan. 14, 1915.)
8) On the 31st of October 1919, shortly after World War One had ended, the Governor of New York at the time, Martin H. Glynn, published an article in the American Hebrew Magazine entitled “The Crucifixion of Jews Must Stop” in which he speaks of the imminent destruction of “six million Jewish men and women,” calling it a “holocaust of human life.”
9) In 1919, the New York Times published a frantic article alleging that 6,000,000 Jews in Ukraine and Poland were being targeted to be “completely exterminated” in pogroms. (“Ukrainian Jews Aim To Stop Pogroms,” New York Times, Sept. 8, 1919.)
10) In 1921, another New York Times article alleges that 6,000,000 Jews in Russia “are facing extermination by massacre.” (“Begs America Save 6,000,000 In Russia,” New York Times, July 20, 1921.)
11) In 1936, Zionist kingpin Chaim Weizmann, in an effort to lobby the British government to permit mass Jewish immigration to Palestine, expressed the view that 6,000,000 Jews had “neither hope nor future” in Europe. (“Before The Royal Commission,” Jewish Western Bulletin, Dec. 11, 1936 / “The Jewish Case: Dr. Weizmann Before Royal Commission,” The London Times, Nov. 26, 1936.)
12) Also in 1936, a desperate appeal for the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine appeared in the New York Times. The article spoke of the “sufferings of millions of persecuted Jews” in “the European holocaust.” Zionists yearned for England to “throw open the gates of Palestine and let in the victimized and persecuted Jews escaping from the European holocaust,” asserting that “the restoration of the land of Israel to the children of Israel is the guiding star in this great struggle for a better world.” (“Americans Appeal For Jewish Refuge,” New York Times, May 31, 1936.) World War Two would not begin for another three years.
13) In 1938, seven years before the end of World War Two, Jews claim exactly six million Jews are victims of “governmental anti-Semitism and persecution.” (“Persecuted Jews Seen On Increase,” New York Times, Jan. 9, 1938.)
14) In 1939, a Jewish publication called The Jewish Criterion predicts that “the coming world war would be the annihilation of six million Jews in East and Central Europe.” (“Review of Events,” The Jewish Criterion (Pittsburgh), Oct. 13, 1939.)
15) In 1941, Nahum Goldmann, the president of the World Jewish Congress at the time, makes an ominous prediction that if the National Socialist Germans are to achieve final victory “6,000,000 Jews in Europe are doomed to destruction.” (“Doom of European Jews Seen If Hitler Wins,” The Palm Beach Post, June 25, 1940.)
16) In November and December of 1944, with a full six months left of the war still to be fought, articles began appearing in Jewish publications already alleging that exactly 6,000,000 Jews had been killed. “Six Million Jews Listed Slaughtered” was the heading of an article published in the November 28, 1944, edition of the Pittsburgh Post. On the same day, the Palestine Post ran the heading “Six Millions Murdered”. These stories were all based on the preposterous claims of Ilya Ehrenburg, a Jewish-Soviet communist propagandist who, in March of 1945, several months before fighting would cease, again prematurely announced that “the world now knows that Germany has killed six million Jews.” (Soviet War News, Mar. 15, 1945.)
That is just a small sample of Jewish persecution propaganda, alleging an imminent “holocaust of six million Jews,” emanating from Zionist media sources. What it shows is that Zionist Jews have been promoting the kabbalistic fable of “six million Jews on the brink of extermination” as a foregone conclusion bound to happen for many years before, during and after World War One. This is documented more thoroughly by Don Heddesheimer in his book “The First Holocaust: Jewish Fundraising Campaigns With Holocaust Claims During and After World War One”. Even as far as the official account is concerned, the figure of ‘six million’ Jewish deaths in their claimed ‘holocaust’ during World War Two was laid to rest long ago. Historian Mark Weber has noted that the “Auschwitz story has changed drastically over the years.” In 1990, the Auschwitz state museum officially revised the alleged death toll there from the absurd figure of 4 million — which was uncritically accepted as ‘fact’ for decades — to 1 or 1.5 million. Other prominent historians have said the total amount of deaths in Auschwitz may be as low as 500,000, whereas revisionists calculate that somewhere between 150,000 and 350,000 Jews and non-Jews died in Auschwitz from all causes, mainly disease and starvation. (Mark Weber, “Auschwitz: Myths and Facts,” Institute for Historical Review, Sept. 2009.) Majdanek, a German concentration camp in Poland, was claimed to be the resting place of 1.5 million murdered victims until, in recent years, the official authorities there drastically reduced the number multiple times, now arriving at a modest figure of 79,000, a bare fraction of its former magnitude. Revisionist historians have arrived at an even lower number. (Jürgen Graf, “A Revisionist Analysis of Majdanek Concentration Camp,” Revisionist History) The 1963 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica speaks of “2,000,000 people, mostly Jews” who were allegedly done to death by the Germans in Mauthausen, a concentration camp in Austria. Establishment sources were forced to concede that this figure is yet another grotesque exaggeration, now placing the Jewish death toll at that camp somewhere around 14,000. (“Mauthausen,” United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Website)
In a rare display of honesty, the Israeli author Tom Segev revealed that the oft-repeated figure of five million non-Jewish victims of Hitler and National Socialism is a tissue of lies. In his book “Simon Wiesenthal: The Life and Legends,” Segev explained that Simon Wiesenthal, the infamous ‘Nazi Hunter’ whose boisterous penchant for fraudulent and exaggerated claims are legend, conjured this figure out of thin air as a marketing ploy to elicit non-Jewish interest in holocaust lore — it has no basis in reality. (Deborah E. Lipstadt, “Simon Wiesenthal and the Ethics of History,” Jewish Review of Books) When taken together, the official reductions of ‘holocaust’ death figures — including the five million gentile victims invented by Wiesenthal — amounts to over 11,000,000 fabricated victims of the Germans! On top of that, there are millions of Jews who claim to be “survivors” of the holocaust. On page 81 of his book “The Holocaust Industry,” Jewish scholar Norman Finkelstein recalled a question that his mother used to ask: “If everyone who claims to be a [holocaust] survivor actually is one, then who did Hitler kill?” Evidently, Hitler did not order the killing of very many Jews at all. His policy all along was never one of extermination, but rather forced deportation.
Yet why, despite these official admissions and astonishing discoveries that have made a gargantuan dent in the sacrosanct “six million dead Jews” figure, are people still being taught in school that this many Jews perished in the Second World War? Why do the media, like trained parrots, endlessly repeat this number? A clue as to why this is was disclosed by the ‘holocaust’ pope Raul Hilberg. Speaking about the Jewish fixation on the ‘six million’ number he said, “call it religious if you like.” (“The war on truth,” The Guardian, Mar. 12, 2001.) Indeed, the holocaust story itself is not a matter of history but a matter of religion — a synthetic mythos designed to pacify the gentiles, paving the way for the creation of Israel and Jewish world dominion. Ian J. Kagedan, a top official of the Jewish-Masonic group B’nai B’rith, let slip the Jewish supremacist agenda underpinning the widespread promotion of the holocaust myth. In 1991, Kagedan said that memorializing the holocaust story “is central to the new world order” and that achieving their “quest of a “new world order” depends on our learning the Holocaust’s lessons.” (Toronto Star, Nov. 26, 1991.) This “New World Order” of global Jewish domination was promised to the leaders of American Jewry by the dedicated Zionist servant Arthur Greenwood, a member of the British War Cabinet during the Second World War. In a vocal pledge of servitude to World Jewry, Greenwood proclaimed that upon Hitler’s defeat in the war Jews everywhere would be given an opportunity to “make a distinctive and constructive contribution in the rebuilding of the world.” (“New World Order Pledged To Jews,” New York Times, Oct. 8, 1940.)
This analysis would not be complete without mentioning the lies that fomented the first Gulf War and their holocaust connection. Most people are unaware of the circumstances that facilitated the first Gulf War between the United States and Iraq. When Saddam Hussein moved his military forces into Kuwait on August 2, 1990, the Zionist Lobby was itching to use this action as an excuse to bomb Iraq and remove Saddam Hussein from power. The American public, however, was not eager to go to war with Saddam and did not feel obliged to get involved in inter-Arab squabbles in the Middle East. To counter the anti-war sentiment, a scheming Jewish-Zionist official in the U.S. government orchestrated a colossal propaganda hoax with which to demonize Iraq and drive the U.S. into war against Saddam and his forces. A short time after Saddam’s occupation of Kuwait, Tom Lantos, the late Jewish democratic Senator from California, created a phony ‘human rights’ organization called the “Congressional Human Rights Foundation”. The group was a front for the Jewish-run public relations firm Hill & Knowlton, which shared the same office building as Lantos’ organization. In October of 1991, Lantos organized a totally scripted conference called the “Congressional Human Rights Caucas” in which Kuwaiti actors posing as ‘downtrodden victims’ of Saddam’s aggression against Kuwait were paid to give false testimony. (“To Sell A War,” CBC News: The Fifth Estate) The star of this Zionist-produced show was a young 15-year-old Kuwaiti girl who appeared at the hearing using the assumed name “Nayirah.” She gave a tearful testimony about how she witnessed atrocities committed by Iraqi soldiers in Kuwait with her own eyes, stating:
“While I was there, I saw the Iraqi soldiers come into the hospital with guns, and go into the room where . . . babies were in incubators. They took the babies out of the incubators, took the incubators, and left the babies on the cold floor to die.” (Ibid.)
Author John R. MacArthur observed that, “Of all the accusations made against the dictator [Saddam Hussein] none had more impact on American public opinion than the one about Iraqi soldiers removing 312 babies from their incubators and leaving them to die on the cold hospital floors of Kuwait City.” (“How PR Sold the War in the Persian Gulf,” PR Watch) It was later revealed that “Nayirah” was a member of the Kuwaiti Royal Family, the daughter of Saud Nasir al-Sabah, Kuwait’s Ambassador to the U.S. She spoke perfect American English without an accent, having lived in the U.S. her whole life. She had been given her lines and trained in the art of acting by the public relations firm Hill & Knowlton. (Ibid.) Her story was a complete fabrication, a lie from A to Z. Nayirah’s false testimony was trumpeted around the world by mainstream media outlets and phony ‘human rights’ groups, and even at the UN by lying Kuwaiti officials seeking Western support in their struggle against Iraq. This fabricated story was the single most critical piece of propaganda that turned the tides of American public and government opinion in favor of war against Saddam. President George H. W. Bush and his top Jewish adviser, the notorious war criminal Henry Kissenger, used it as the casus belli for their policy of aggression in the Gulf.
During the hearing, Lantos and some of his paid stooges incessantly made comparisons between Saddam Hussein and Adolf Hitler, and Iraq and Nazi Germany. Lantos, a Jew of Hungarian origin, claims to be one of the countless millions of ‘holocaust survivors,’ so he is well versed in the art of lying for a political cause. At the heart of his agenda to instigate an American attack against Iraq was certainly his commitment to the cause of Zionism, seeking the destruction of one of Israel’s main adversaries in the Middle East, Iraq and Saddam Hussein. Lantos, who thankfully is now deceased, was one of the featured stars of Steven Spielberg’s egregious holocaust hoax documentary “The Last Days”. The utter fraudulence of Spielberg’s film and the testimony of the interviewees featured in it was exposed in a counter-documentary called “The Last Days of the Big Lie”.
To top off all of this disgraceful deception on the part of Jewish supremacists and their evil minions, there is another piece of information worth drawing attention to. In a stunning example of the Jewish propensity to spread malicious lies about their enemies, a ridiculous display of anti-Iraqi propaganda was featured in the New York-based Jewish Press, then calling itself “the largest independent Anglo-Jewish weekly newspaper,” which had on its title page on February 21, 1991: “IRAQIS HAVE GAS CHAMBERS FOR ALL JEWS”. Moreover, the front cover announcement of volume 12, number 1 (spring 1991), of Response, a periodical published by the Jewish Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles, was: “GERMANS PRODUCE ZYKLON B IN IRAQ (Iraq’s German-made gas chamber)”. Nobody took these claims seriously, and they were patently untrue, but it goes to show that Jews are not very inventive when it comes to war propaganda, simply repeating lame anti-German canards from the Second World War.
The lesson to be learned from all of this is that Jews love to tell atrocity tales involving young children as the victims. This type of propaganda is very effective at inflaming public opinion because nobody, other than Zionist Jews, likes to see innocent children suffer and die. While Jewish propagandists promulgate phony tales of Germans and Iraqis slaughtering children, the Israeli army actually guns down little Palestinian children in the streets of Gaza and the West Bank on a daily basis, having deliberately murdered tens of thousands of innocent children since the earliest days of the Zionist takeover of Palestine led by the Irgun and Stern gangs. In “Operation Cast Lead,” Israel’s barbaric and lethal siege against the people of Gaza in 2008/09, about one quarter of the nearly 1400 Palestinian casualties were children; of the 5300 injured, 1606 were children. (“Operation Cast Lead, 27 Dec. ’08 to 18 Jan. ’09,” B’tselem, Jan. 01, 2011.) Journalist Stephen Lendman reported that “[s]ince the September 2000 Second Intifada, Israeli forces killed 1179 children, including 865 in Gaza as part of a decades-long policy of collectively punishing millions of Palestinians in the Occupied Territories, mostly civilian men, women, and children.” (“Israeli War Crimes Against Children During Operation Cast Lead,” Global Research, June 12, 2009.) The Jewish lust for the blood of innocent children was perfectly epitomized in an unnerving interview featuring Madeleine Albright, the Secretary of State under Bill Clinton. In an interview with CBS 60 Minutes, the Zionist Jew Albright was asked if the inhuman economic sanctions imposed on Iraq by the U.S. government after the first Gulf War, which caused the deaths of over 500,000 Iraqi children, was “worth the price.” With a sick look in her eyes, Albright coldly responded: “I think this is a very hard choice, but we think the price was worth it.” (“Punishing Saddam,” CBS News 60 Minutes, May 12, 1996.) These facts reveal who the real child-killers are in this world.
Why are Jews such prolific peddlers of lies and falsehoods? The Jewish religion actually advocates lying to and deceiving non-Jews. In his scholarly study “The Truth About the Talmud,” revisionist historian Michael Hoffman noted that in Baba Kamma 113a of the Babylonian Talmud it condones the use of lies and subterfuges to “circumvent a Gentile.” Rabbi Joseph Telushkin plainly admitted that “Jewish tradition is tolerant of those who bend the truth… Jewish law is remarkably tolerant of ‘white lies.’” (“White Lies,” My Jewish Learning Website) Each year, religious Jews undergo a ritual in which they pledge themselves to be recklessly dishonest, relinquishing all future oaths and promises. This ritual, called the “Kol Nidre,” is considered the holiest of Jewish prayers. Critics, however, have called the prayer a license to lie and cheat. (Rev. Ted Pike, “Kol Nidre: Judaism’s License To Lie,” Truth Tellers, Nov. 17, 2008.) On the eve of the ‘Day of Atonement,’ Jews recite these words:
“All vows, obligations, oaths, and anathemas, whether called ‘ḳonam,’ ‘ḳonas,’ or by any other name, which we may vow, or swear, or pledge, or whereby we may be bound, from this Day of Atonement until the next (whose happy coming we await), we do repent. May they be deemed absolved, forgiven, annulled, and void, and made of no effect; they shall not bind us nor have power over us. The vows shall not be reckoned vows; the obligations shall not be obligatory; nor the oaths be oaths.” (“KOL NIDRE,” Jewish Encyclopedia, 1906.)
The communist doctrine — the spawn of Jewish supremacist ideologues — also championed the use of lies and subterfuge to accomplish political objectives. The communist idol and first Soviet dictator Vladimir Lenin, a monstrous Jewish criminal who founded the Cheka, the genocidal secret police apparatus of the Soviet regime, once said that “a lie told often enough becomes the truth.” (M. Kumar. Dictionary of Quotations. APH Publishing: New Delhi, India, 2008. p. 134) Promises, Lenin surmised, “are like pie-crusts—made to be broken.” (LIFE Magazine, Dec. 23, 1957.) Extolling the virtues of deception, Lenin instructed his underlings to “utilize all possible cunning and illegal methods, deny and conceal the truth.” (“The present stage of Soviet global expansion: sources, goals and prospects,” U.S. Army Institute for Advanced Russian and East European Studies, p. 29.) In contrast, compare the maniacal teachings of Judaism and its birth-child Bolshevism with that of National Socialism. The ideology of Adolf Hitler and his National Socialist German Workers’ Party (NSDAP) is exactly the opposite of Judaism and Bolshevism, preaching honor, integrity, loyalty, pride and truth. (Gottfried Feder, “Programme of the Party of Hitler, the NSDAP and its General Conceptions,” Zentralverlag der NSDAP, 1932.) National Socialism is the most vilified political philosophy on earth due to its staunch opposition to Jewish domination. Despite the deliberate distortions and hatred surrounding Hitler and his movement, the true facts of the time paint quite a drastically different picture of the man and the philosophy he espoused. Unlike Bolshevism and its father, Judaism, National Socialism practiced a rather benevolent strategy when it came to propaganda. The NSDAP’s “Handbook On Propaganda” itself states on page 5:
“… we are not propagandizing lies and untruths as England did during the War, but rather we are preaching freedom and prosperity, socialism and patriotism to our confused people. Our struggle and our propaganda have one supreme principle: to take truth and only truth as the foundation of our propaganda.”
The National Socialist propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels, dubbed a “big liar” by the Jewish-dominated press, always held that the best propaganda is that which does no more than serve the truth. In 1935, at a Nuremberg rally, Goebbels righteously explained that, “Good propaganda does not need to lie … It has no reason to fear the truth. … A propaganda that lies proves that it has a bad cause. It cannot be successful in the long run.” (“Goebbels at Nuremberg — 1934,” Calvin German Propaganda Archive) The late Jacques Ellul, a French professor of history and sociology at the University of Bordeaux and a former anti-German partisan during World War Two, conceded that Goebbels “never stopped battling for propaganda to be as accurate as possible.” (Garth S. Jowett and Victoria O’Donnell. Readings in Propaganda and Persuasion: New and Classic Essays. SAGE, 2006, p. 48, note 47) Hitler, in his autobiography ‘Mein Kampf,’ repeated a phrase coined by the German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer that the Jews are the ‘Great Master of Lies,’ explaining that “[f]rom time immemorial … the Jews have known better than any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited.” (Mein Kampf, Murphy Translation, p. 134) Hitler harshly condemned the use of “big lies” in political propaganda and identified Jewish supremacists and their tool of Marxism as the source of this technique. (Ibid.) Hitler stressed that those who are too foolish or dimwitted to recognize the deceitful nature of supremacist Jews will “never be able to lend a hand in helping truth to prevail.” (Ibid.)
Hitler’s profound wisdom came through in his extraordinary speeches and writings. He was vastly knowledgeable and possessed expert reasoning abilities. He was a tremendously skillful logical thinker and had the uncanny gift of foresight. Writing about the Jewish lust for a ‘homeland’ in Palestine, Hitler sniffed out the insincerity of this Zionist endeavor, suggesting that the Jews did not actually want a state of their own for the purpose of living there. The real aim of Zionism, Hitler theorized, was to establish a “central organization for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.” (Mein Kampf, Chapter XI: Nation and Race) In much the same way that Osama bin Laden described the desire of Jewish supremacists to control and subjugate their foes, Hitler once stated that the modus operandi of International Jewry is to “exploit nations and make them the slaves of their international guild of criminals.” (Adolf Hitler, and Max Domarus. The Essential Hitler: Speeches and Commentary. Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers, Illinois. 2007. pp. 406-412.)
Undoubtedly, the Zionist propaganda of the past is propelling the Zionist propaganda of the present. In essence, these atrocious lies are designed to drive a wedge between the Christian world and the Muslim world, railroading gentiles into a third world war in which the only real victor will be World Jewry and their fabricated nation-state of Israel. Most importantly, the religious creed of these neoconservative warmongers is the holocaust fable – it is the backbone of neocon thinking. This dangerous convergence of historical untruths, and the blind acceptance of these falsehoods by the majority of the masses of people, is leading the entire planet toward perpetual hostilities and bloodshed.
© 2013 Zander C. Fuerza
Download the complete book HERE