CHAPTER SEVEN
The Myth of Osama bin Laden & the Nineteen Arab Oswalds
What evidence exists that nineteen Islamic fanatics directed by a man in a cave thousands of miles away were involved in 9/11? None. Nada. Zero. Not a shred. When pressed on the issue, the FBI quietly confessed that they have no evidence linking Osama bin Laden with 9/11. (Ed Haas, “The FBI admits: No Hard Evidence Connecting Bin Laden to 9/11,” Muckraker Report, July 25, 2009.) Shortly after 9/11, the Taliban offered to hand bin Laden over to the U.S. if the Bush administration would simply provide them with sufficient proof of his guilt. Bush and his cronies scoffed at the offer and continued dropping bombs on Afghanistan. (“Bush rejects Taliban offer to hand Bin Laden over,” The Guardian, Oct. 14 2001.)
If, as I contend, 9/11 was an Israeli plot, then who were these 19 men whose pictures and identities were flashed all over our TV screens within a few days of the attacks? (“FBI list of individuals identified as suspected hijackers,” CNN, Sept. 14, 2001.) Patsies. Dupes. Fall guys for the Mossad. The Mossad’s motto is: “By way of deception thou shalt do war.” It is the Mossad’s specialty to frame Arabs and Muslims for acts of terror that they commit themselves, just as it is generally the Jewish specialty to frame non-Jews for their own misdeeds and to fabricate the extent of non-Jewish persecution of Jews. As we learned earlier in this text, on 9/11 the Mossad tried to trick the NYPD into thinking Palestinians were going to bomb the Holland tunnel when in reality two Israelis attempted to explode a truck bomb on the George Washington Bridge. We also witnessed the Jewish-owned news media promulgate a fraudulent video clip purporting to show Palestinians celebrating the 9/11 attacks in the West Bank, when five Israelis were actually celebrating the attacks in New Jersey, right across the Hudson river! The brazen pattern of criminal Jewish manipulation of this event does not stop there.
The nineteen 9/11 “hijackers” have proved to be phantoms and dupes set up to take the blame for a crime they did not commit. (David Ray Griffin, “Was America Attacked by Muslims on 9/11?”) This is a standard component of a false-flag operation — Lee Harvey Oswald served this function in the JFK assassination conspiracy. How could these 19 men have been working for “Al-Qaeda” when that organization doesn’t even exist? (“BBC now admits al qaeda never existed,” YouTube) The term ‘Al-Qaeda’ has several translations, one of which is ‘the toilet’ and the other is ‘the base’. It is actually just a reference to the database of Arab and Islamic fighters and mercenaries financed, armed, trained and used by the CIA, the Saudis, the Pakistani ISI and the Mossad to wage an insurgency against the Soviets in the Afghan-Soviet war, which lasted nine years from December 1979 to February 1989. (Pierre-Henri Bunel, “Al Qaeda: The Database,” Global Research, May 12, 2011.) Osama bin Laden was the CIA’s/Mossad’s point man in Afghanistan in the 1980s, leading a segment of the Islamic Mujaheddin fighters against the Soviet occupiers. The CIA called this endeavor “operation cyclone,” the second largest covert operation in its history. In his book “The Other Side of Deception,” former Mossad officer Victor Ostrovsky acknowledged that this operation was under the direct supervision of Mossad. Bin Laden’s CIA/Mossad handlers would later turn him into a convenient scapegoat and scarecrow for international terrorism when it suited their purposes.
A large portion of the American government’s case against ‘Al-Qaeda’ rests on a series of amusingly implausible scenarios and highly dubious “discoveries” by U.S. “investigators.” One major claim of the official conspiracy theory that defies all possible logic, and even contradicts basic laws of physics, is the story that several of the alleged Muslim hijackers’ passports, and other flimsy items supposedly belonging to them, miraculously managed to survive the violently explosive plane crashes, conveniently falling into the hands of American government officials and used to “prove” their sham version of events.
According to the New York police commissioner Bernard Kerik, in what can only be described as the most asinine assertion of all time, the passport of Satam Al Suqami (who is claimed to have been one of the hijackers on Flight 11) miraculously survived the crash into the North Tower of the WTC and the subsequent fireball explosion, escaping the cabin of the plane, falling hundreds of feet to the ground, and was then picked up by some random passerby a few blocks away who turned it in to the NYPD. (“New arrest warrants issued in terrorism probe,” CNN, Sept. 17, 2001.) The passport appeared to be in pristine condition — remarkably unburned with no visible damage! It is extremely important to note that on August 26, 2001, NYPD chief Bernard Kerik made a four day trip to Israel to discuss “terrorism” related issues with Israeli security officials. (“Kerik Plans Mission To Israel,” NY Daily News, Aug 26, 2001.) In 2007, Kerik was indicted on 16 counts including fraud and conspiracy as well as taking and failing to report a $250,000 loan from billionaire Israeli tycoon Eitan Wertheimer, who spent time with Kerik on his trip to Israel in August of 2001. (“Kerik Loan Activity Is Brought to Light After Indictment,” New York Times, Nov. 24, 2007.) A Jewish marble and stone merchant from Brooklyn named Shimon Cohen was the intermediary for the loan transaction. Interestingly, the Wertheimer family’s vast holdings include companies that have contracts with the United States Department of Defense. (Ibid.) It is more than likely that this Jewish loan shark, Eitan Wertheimer, was Kerik’s handler and his trip to Israel shortly before 9/11 was where he received his instructions.
The official narrative gets even more ridiculous. According to the official story, Flight 93 is said to have crashed in a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, after the passengers stormed the ‘Al-Qaeda’ hijackers in the cockpit, bringing the plane down in an act of heroism. Many researchers have pointed out the complete lack of any recognizable debris in and around the cartoon cut-out impact crater that was present in that field in Shanksville, which is said to have been caused by the plane crash. The official propagandists have attempted to explain away this discrepancy like this:
“United Airlines Flight 93 slammed into the earth Sept. 11 near Shanksville, Somerset County, at more than 500 mph, with a ferocity that disintegrated metal, bone and flesh. It took more than three months to identify the remains of the 40 passengers and crew, and, by process of elimination, the four hijackers.”(Pittsburgh Post Gazette, Dec. 30, 2001.)
Other defenders of the official story have postulated that Flight 93 crashed so horribly that the entirety of it was buried dozens of feet underground, leaving absolutely no visible debris on the surface. These explanations are simply not believable and are quite preposterous. Every other major plane crash site in history left a highly visible trail of wreckage. The Flight 93 debris field covered between five and eight square miles, which is more consistent with a mid-air explosion or a shoot-down rather than an ordinary crash. (“Flight 93 Crash Site,” 911 Research WTC-7 Website) Moreover, satellite images of the same field where Flight 93 is alleged to have crashed taken by the U.S.G.S. (United States Geological Survey) in 1994 undeniably proves that the crater which authorities claim was caused by the impact of Flight 93 was already present in that field for years before 9/11 happened — although it appears to have been slightly modified for 9/11. (Chris Bollyn, “The Shanksville Deception of 9-11,” Bollyn Website, Feb. 4, 2010.)
What totally undermines these feeble attempts at writing off the lack of plane debris in and around that phony crater is that the FBI also claims to have recovered from the wreckage of Flight 93 the passport of alleged hijacker Ziad Jarrah, the passport of alleged hijacker Saeed Al Ghamdi, an Islamic “martyrdom note,” as well as a red bandana, which authorities claim the hijackers were wearing. Three of the items were not burned or damaged in any way, and luckily most of the face is visible on the indestructible passport of Ziad Jarrah. (See picture) So we are being asked to believe that three paper documents and a piece of cloth material magically survived the same impact that steel-titanium jet engines could not. These items are an obvious fabrication of the government to prop up the “Arab hijackers” fable.
This fairy tale actually gets better. The official story says that Mohammed Atta was the ringleader of the 9/11 attackers and precision piloted Flight 11 into the North Tower of the WTC. The official story also ludicrously asserts that Atta brought luggage with him on his suicide flight containing these items: a Boeing 757 training video, a flight data recorder, a Quran, a switch blade, pepper spray, and a written letter containing his last will with instructions to the other ‘Muslim hijackers,’ including their names. What’s more incredible is that Atta’s luggage, the official story attests, did not get loaded onto the plane and fell right into the hands of the FBI! (“Koran and plane video found in flight bag,” The Telegraph, Sept. 12, 2001.) Indeed, a former FBI agent says that Atta’s bag, and the bizarrely incriminating items found within it, literally “made their case” against ‘Al-Qaeda’:
“A former FBI agent and a former federal prosecutor who helped direct the New England investigation of the Sept. 11 attacks told Newsday that one bag found in Boston contained far more than what the commission report cited, including the names of the hijackers, their assignments and their al-Qaida connections.
“It had all these Arab-language papers that amounted to the Rosetta stone of the investigation,” former FBI agent Warren Flagg said. The former federal prosecutor, who declined to be identified publicly, supported Flagg’s account.
“How do you think the government was able to identify all 19 hijackers almost immediately after the attacks?” Flagg asked. ‘They were identified through those papers in the luggage. And that’s how it was known so soon that al-Qaida was behind the hijackings.’” (Michael Dorman, “An untold story of 9/11,” Newsday, April 17, 2006.)
Sounding like a script of a bad Hollywood action film, these nonsensical claims raise a few logical questions. Firstly, why would these ‘Muslim hijackers’ bring passports on domestic flights when they are not needed? Secondly, why would Atta pack luggage for a suicide mission where it is just going to get destroyed in the crash anyway? More importantly, why fill this bag with a plethora of highly incriminating material that would surely get one detained at the security check-in, needlessly jeopardizing the entire mission!? And these people are supposed to have been geniuses who outsmarted the most sophisticated military-defense system in the history of the world!? When you take a close look at the alleged hijackers and the circumstances surrounding their movements and activities in the United States prior to the attacks, this fable begins to fall apart at the seams. There is no shortage of illogical fallacies which shatter the myth of the 19 Arab Oswalds. If you are not already convinced that the official story concerning 9/11’s “Muslim hijackers” is a bogus fairy tale, then you will be soon enough.
The official story also contends that the day before 9/11 Mohammed Atta and Abdul Alomari drove to Portland, Maine, stayed overnight, and then caught a connecting flight back to Boston the next morning, allegedly boarding and then hijacking Flight 11 at Boston’s Logan Airport. What would be the point of this unnecessary and needlessly risky trip to Portland? The only known airport security video in which Atta appears to be boarding a flight is from Portland, not Boston. (“Mohamed Atta: Terrorist, Patsy, or Scapegoat?,” What Really Happened) These brilliant ‘terrorists’ obligingly left numerous clues behind to incriminate themselves, such as Arabic language flight training manuals that are said to have been discovered in a rented white Mitsubishi Mirage found at Boston’s Logan Airport on the evening of 9/11. (Naftali Bendavid, “Officials scour U.S. for clues,” The Baltimore Sun, Sept. 13, 2001.) Agents allegedly found a 1989 Pontiac Grand Prix at Logan Airport in Boston as well, which purportedly belonged to Atta. (Ibid.) How can this be if Atta drove to Portland with Alomari the night before 9/11 and took a connecting flight back to Boston in the morning? That would require two cars. Why would Atta leave a car containing incriminating evidence at Boston’s Logan Airport, rent a second car in Boston to drive to Portland, and then fly back to Boston again? The incompetent authors of this farcical script obviously did not think things through. They were counting on the ignorance of the American public when they conceived this hoax knowing that most people are too lazy and apathetic to think critically about these things or even take the time to analyze these critical details.
The abandoned rental cars containing Arabic flight manuals, Atta’s magical luggage and the indestructible passports of several of these 9/11 patsies, are obvious concoctions of the Mossad and its Zionist helpers in the FBI. All of these illogical oddities, irrational absurdities and fictitious fabrications unveil an incompetent storyline authored by beguiling Zionist scriptwriters. We have also been led to believe that these alleged hijackers were devout Muslims motivated by an extreme interpretation of their religion. However, the activities of these individuals in the year leading up to 9/11 contradict that assertion. The San Francisco Chronicle reported that Atta and other alleged hijackers had made at least six trips to Las Vegas where they had “engaged in some decidedly un-Islamic sampling of prohibited pleasures,” including heavy drinking, cavorting with lap dancers, and bringing call girls to their rooms. (Kevin Fagan, “Agents of terror leave their mark on Sin City,” San Francisco Chronicle, Oct. 4 2001.) The night before 9/11, three men were witnessed in a bar making loud anti-American statements and spoke of impending bloodshed, according to John Kap, the manager of the Pink Pony and Red Eyed Jack’s Sports Bar in Daytona Beach. The unidentified men conveniently left a Holy Quran behind at the bar! (“Manager: Men spewed anti-American sentiments,” USA Today, Sept. 14, 2001.)
The real Mohammed Atta was indeed a very religious man. This was confirmed by Dittmar Machule, Mohammed Atta’s thesis advisor in Hamburg, who described him as “a very nice young man: polite, very religious and with a highly developed critical faculty.” (Joel Achenbach, “‘You Never Imagine’ A Hijacker Next Door,” The Washington Post, Sept. 16 2001.) This description of him is vastly at odds with the personality of the “Mohammed Atta” living and going to flight school in Florida, according to the testimony of his former girlfriend Amanda Keller, an American stripper and lingerie model. According to Keller’s testimony, the Florida Atta “loved to party… He was out with Keller nearly every night they were together… He was a heavy drinker, snorted coke, was a stylish dresser and wore expensive jewelry.” (“Mohamed Atta loved pork chops, and 49 other things you may not know,” Democratic Underground, April 18, 2004.) Keller also said that Atta, or the person claiming to be him, loved porkchops, spoke fluent Hebrew and associated with people connected to the Mafia. Moreover, six nights before the attack, at a bar called Shuckums in Ft Lauderdale, Atta and two companions got “wasted” and then Atta blasphemed, yelling “Fuck God” out loud, according to Tony Amos and bartender Patricia Idrissi. All of this is documented in a book called “Welcome to Terrorland” by Daniel Hopsicker. The outrageous activities of these “devout Muslims” are not consistent with religious fanatics about to perform a martyrdom operation but are consistent with Israeli imposters mixing business with pleasure. Sophisticated terrorists certainly wouldn’t leave a mile-wide trail of evidence behind them for the FBI to follow, almost as if they wanted to get caught. On the other hand, Israeli Mossad assets trying to establish a ‘legend’, a back-story, which could then be played up by the Jewish-owned media to implicate Muslims for 9/11, certainly would have engaged in this type of attention-seeking behavior to fulfill their ‘role’ impersonating the 19 Arab Oswalds.
Within a few weeks of the attack reports surfaced showing that several of the named 9/11 terrorists were actually alive and well in the Middle East, apparent victims of identity theft! (“Hijack ‘suspects’ alive and well,” BBC News, Sept. 23, 2001 / “At Least 7 of the 9/11 Hijackers are Still Alive,” What Really Happened) Among those found alive were: Abdul Aziz al-Omari, Salem al-Hamzi, Saeed al-Ghamdi, Ahmed al-Nami, Wail al-Shehri, Waleed M. al-Shehri, and Mohand al-Shehri. (“MANY 9-11 “HIJACKERS” ARE STILL ALIVE.,” Guardian 150m Website) Abdul Aziz al-Omari told reporters he was an engineer who had no clue how to fly a plane and that “his passport was stolen when his apartment in Denver, Colorado, was burgled in 1995.” (David Harrison, “Revealed: the men with stolen identities,” UK Telegraph, Sept. 23, 2001.) The picture used on the FBI suspects’ list for Abdul Aziz al-Omari was that of another person, also alive, named Abdul Rahman al-Omari, a Saudi Airlines pilot who went to the U.S. embassy in Jeddah demanding to know why he was being declared a dead terrorist. (Robert Fisk, “‘Suicide hijacker’ is an airline pilot alive and well in Jeddah,” The Independent, Sept. 17, 2001.) In 1999, while living in Germany, Mohammed Atta and two of his alleged accomplices reported their passports had been stolen. (“Investigating Terror People: Mohammad Atta,” BBC News) Ziad Jarrah, who is alleged to have been the lead hijacker on Flight 93, was not religiously or politically inclined, according to his Lebanese family and his German flight school roommate Thorsten Biermann. In a stunning revelation, the New York Times reported that Ziad Jarrah’s Lebanese Muslim cousin, Ali al-Jarrah, was a paid spy for Israel, serving the Mossad for more than two decades! Under the cover of a supporter of the Palestinian cause, Ali al-Jarrah was conducting spying operations for Israel against Palestinian groups and the Lebanese resistance movement Hezbollah. (Robert F. Worth, “Lebanese in Shock Over Arrest of an Accused Spy,” New York Times, Feb. 18, 2009.) Commenting on this intriguing discovery, journalist Michael Collins Piper opined:
“The gratuitous Times suggestion that the two cousins “do not appear to have known each other well” is intriguing, inasmuch as it is an admission that they did, in fact, know one another. And that could be very telling, for there are those who are now suggesting that the older cousin may indeed have recruited his younger cousin as an asset for Israeli intelligence.” (“Mossad Link Found to One of Key 9-11 Hijackers,” American Free Press, March 2009.)
In February of 2000, Jarrah lost his passport while waiting for a visa to go to the U.S. Furthermore, it has been established that the photograph which appears on Ziad Jarrah’s passport that was allegedly recovered from the wreckage of Flight 93 is not the real Jarrah. (“Photographic Evidence Showing Ziad Jarrah Was Not a 9/11 Hijacker,” What Really Happened) In an investigative article titled “The Two Jarrahs,” which can be viewed on the ‘From The Wilderness’ website, Paul Thompson conclusively demonstrates that there were two “Ziad Jarrahs”. While many of the details are sketchy, Thompson shows that there was another person named Ziah Jarrah living in the United States prior to the Lebanese Jarrah ever arriving in the country. In 1995, writes Thompson, “a person named Ziad Jarrah rented an apartment in a three-family house on East Third Street in Brooklyn, New York. … Landlords there identified his photograph as being the same as that of the 9/11 hijacker.” The Jarrah accused of participating in 9/11 didn’t arrive in the U.S. until June of 2000. Confirmation of the existence of this second, identical-looking Jarrah came on January 30, 2001, when a man named Ziad Jarrah was questioned for several hours at the Dubai International Airport in the United Arab Emirates at the behest of the CIA, who suspected he was involved in terrorist activities. During questioning, this Jarrah acknowledged having spent the previous two months in Pakistan and Afghanistan. (“September 11 hijacker questioned in January 2001,” CNN, Aug. 1, 2002.) The problem with this story is that the real Ziad Jarrah was somewhere else at the time, a Florida Flight Training facility where he had been studying for the previous six months. Paul Thompson observed that,
“These two examples are just the most glaring clues of many that someone was posing as Ziad Jarrah for years. The story of Jarrah in New York in 1995 is truly amazing, because that would have happened presumably before the 9/11 plot was even conceived, and before Mohamed Atta or most of the other 9/11 terrorists even joined al-Qaeda. Additionally, it was before Jarrah had moved to Germany so he couldn’t possibly have had come into contact with any al-Qaeda operatives yet. Yet, not only is there another Ziad Jarrah, but two looked similar enough for people in Brooklyn to confuse the two.”
A plausible conclusion that can be drawn from this information is that the Ziad Jarrah who was accused of hijacking United Airlines Flight 93 was framed by a Doppelgänger with a similar appearance. Mossad is known for such elaborate schemes. Ziad Jarrah was not the only one that was the victim of a frame-up. Initially a sloppy attempt was made to frame two Arab brothers, Adnan and Ameer Bukhari. Their names were tied to a silver-blue Nissan Ultima found in Portland, Maine. Investigators initially listed the brothers as hijackers who boarded Flight 11. Authorities even said that Adnan’s name appeared on the passenger manifest of Flight 11. (“Saudi flight engineer no longer part of investigation,” Associated Press, Sept. 14, 2001.) The information found in the rental car led authorities to a house in Vero Beach, Florida, that had allegedly been rented by these two brothers. Inside it were two pilot’s certificates in the names of Adnan Bukhari and his brother, Ameer Abbas Bukhari. (“Evidence trails lead to Florida,” BBC News, Sept. 13, 2001.) This ridiculous sham completely fell apart when it surfaced that Adnan Bukhari was still alive and his brother Ameer had died in a small plane crash a year earlier! (“Feds think they’ve identified some hijackers,” CNN, Sept. 13, 2001.) In 2002, British intelligence reported that the so-called Al-Qaeda cells blamed for the 9/11 attacks had been controlled and directed by Israeli Mossad agents posing as Islamic radicals. This revelation was uncovered by Wayne Madsen who wrote:
“British intelligence reported in February 2002 that the Israeli Mossad ran the Arab hijacker cells that were later blamed by the U.S. government’s 9/11 Commission for carrying out the aerial attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon. WMR has received details of the British intelligence report which was suppressed by the government of then-Prime Minister Tony Blair.
A Mossad unit consisting of six Egyptian and Yemeni-born Jews infiltrated “Al Qaeda” cells in Hamburg (the Atta-Mamoun Darkanzali cell), south Florida, and Sharjah in the United Arab Emirates in the months before 9/11. The Mossad not only infiltrated cells but began to run them and give them specific orders that would eventually culminate in their being on board four regularly-scheduled flights originating in Boston, Washington Dulles, and Newark, New Jersey on 9/11.
The Mossad infiltration team comprised six Israelis, comprising two cells of three agents, who all received special training at a Mossad base in the Negev Desert in their future control and handling of the “Al Qaeda” cells. One Mossad cell traveled to Amsterdam where they submitted to the operational control of the Mossad’s Europe Station, which operates from the El Al complex at Schiphol International Airport. The three-man Mossad unit then traveled to Hamburg where it made contact with Mohammed Atta, who believed they were sent by Osama Bin Laden. In fact, they were sent by Ephraim Halevy, the chief of Mossad.
The two Mossad teams sent regular coded reports on the progress of the 9/11 operation to Tel Aviv via the Israeli embassy in Washington, DC. WMR has learned from a Pentagon source that leading Americans tied to the media effort to pin 9/11 on Arab hijackers, Osama Bin Laden, and the Taliban were present in the Israeli embassy on September 10, 2001, to coordinate their media blitz for the subsequent days and weeks following the attacks. It is more than likely that FBI counter-intelligence agents who conduct surveillance of the Israeli embassy have proof on the presence of the Americans present at the embassy on September 10. Some of the Americans are well-known to U.S. cable news television audiences.
In mid-August, the Mossad team running the Hamburg cell in Boston reported to Tel Aviv that the final plans for 9/11 were set. The Florida-based Mossad cell reported that the documented “presence” of the Arab cell members at Florida flight schools had been established. […]
WMR previously reported that the Mossad cell operating in the Jersey City-Weehawken area of New Jersey through Urban Moving Systems was suspected by some in the FBI and CIA of being involved in moving explosives into the World Trade Center as well as staging “false flag” demonstrations at least two locations in north Jersey: Liberty State Park and an apartment complex in Jersey City as the first plane hit the World Trade Center’s North Tower. One team of Urban Moving Systems Mossad agents was arrested later on September 11 and jailed for five months at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. Some of their names turned up in a joint CIA-FBI database as known Mossad agents, along with the owner of Urban Moving Systems, Dominik Suter, whose name also appeared on a “Law Enforcement Sensitive” FBI 9/11 suspects list, along with the names of key “hijackers,” including Mohammed Atta and Hani Hanjour, as well as the so-called “20th hijacker,” Zacarias Moussaoui.” (“British Intelligence Reports Mossad Ran 9/11 “Arab” Hijacker Terrorist Operation,” Wayne Madsen Report, Jan. 27, 2011.)
Madsen’s report dovetails nicely with two other important facts. The hundreds of detained Israeli spies fronting as “art students” had been following and living “within hundreds of yards” of the Arab patsies who were later blamed for 9/11. Keith Phucas, writing for The Times Herald, reported:
“A memorandum sent to the 9/11 Commission, and Senate and House intelligence committees in September 2004, suggests that young Israelis who canvassed dozens of U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) offices in 2000 and 2001 trying to sell paintings to federal workers, may have been spying not only on the DEA, but also on Arab extremists in the United States – including the Sept. 11 hijackers who were living in Florida and New Jersey. The Israeli “art student” story, which first surfaced in 2001 in news reports, has yet to be explained by U.S. authorities. Curiously, the 9/11 Commission did not venture to connect the myriad of dots to solve the mystery. […]
In 2001, a Fox News report by Carl Cameron laid out the Israeli spy scenario, however, the story was short-lived, and Shea was told by a representative at the news organization that there was outside pressure to kill the story. Several publications, including The Forward, Insight and the French newspaper, Le Monde, picked up the story in 2002. All indicated there was extreme reluctance by U.S. officials – and practically anyone else – to discuss the matter publicly. […]
One of the memorandum’s most fascinating revelations puts the Israelis and would-be 9/11 hijackers in close proximity geographically in the months prior to the terrorist attacks in Florida, Oklahoma and New Jersey. As the DEA was compiling its report in June 2001, 15 or the 19 plotters of the Sept. 11 attacks were living in the Hollywood, Fla., area, according to Shea’s research, and more than 30 of the young Israelis also lived in the same area during this time period.
According to the memorandum, some of the Israelis and hijackers in Florida lived “within hundreds of yards” of each other. Besides Hollywood, the Israelis and hijacker lived within about five miles of one another in other southern Florida towns, including Coral Springs, Plantation, Fort Lauderdale, Miami and Coral Gables.” (“Sept. 11 riddles remain,” The Times Herald, Aug. 08, 2005.)
These two reports paint a clear picture of Israeli malfeasance. The Israelis, impersonating Muslim radicals, were creating a legend that was utilized by their kinsmen in the media and their stooges in the American government to propagate the ‘Al-Qaeda’ narrative. The second meaningful connection to all of this that must be noted is the foul intrigues of the corrupt Washington lobbyist Jack Abramoff. Abramoff is an Orthodox Jew and an avid reader of the Talmud. He has been described as “a fierce supporter of Israel — “a super-Zionist,” one associate says.” (Michael Isikoff, “Fund-Raising: Take It to the (West) Bank,” Newsweek, May 2, 2006.) In his career as a professional lobbyist, Abramoff was neck-deep in, as writer Justin Raimondo opined, “payoffs, phony nonprofit foundations, and other criminal activities up to and including murder.” (“Abramoff and the Israeli Connection,” Anti War, Jan. 12, 2006.) Using a phony charity called the Capital Athletic Fund, Abramoff funneled fraudulently obtained funds from Indian tribes to subsidize the murderous activities of fanatical Jewish settlers in the West Bank, such as a paramilitary outfit based in the ultra-Orthodox settlement of Beitar Illit. (Ibid.) Michael Isikoff, reporting on Abramoff’s illegal fundraising activities on behalf of Jewish colonizers in occupied Palestine, noted:
“More than $140,000 of foundation funds were actually sent to the Israeli West Bank where they were used by a Jewish settler to mobilize against the Palestinian uprising. Among the expenditures: purchases of camouflage suits, sniper scopes, night-vision binoculars, a thermal imager, and other material described in foundation records as ‘security’ equipment.” (“Fund-Raising: Take It to the (West) Bank,” Newsweek, May 2, 2006.)
Abramoff, who once referred to Palestinians as “dirty rats,” had extensive ties to the Jewish-Zionist world. The Jewish Telegraphic Agency admitted:
“While Abramoff has been portrayed as a man willing to do nearly anything to further his political goals and wallet, he also has been an idiosyncratic player in the Jewish community of the nation’s capital, starting several short-lived, money-losing ventures to fill religious gaps he saw in the city’s Jewish world. He also used his largess to further Israeli businesses and charities that appealed to his conservative worldview. Specifically, Abramoff is accused of using money from a Washington charity he oversaw to fund military-type programs in the West Bank. Indian tribes donated money to tax-exempt charities, believing they were supporting anti-gambling foundations, but the money was redirected to help a “sniper school” in the West Bank, operated by a friend of Abramoff. According to congressional documents, Abramoff sought night-vision goggles and a vehicle for the sniper-training facility.” (“Abramoff’s Jewish ties in spotlight,” Jewish Telegraphic Agency, Jan. 09, 2006.)
In 2006, Abramoff and his criminal cohort Adam Kidan were convicted of multiple counts of fraud, corruption, conspiracy, and tax evasion. Both of them were sentenced to 70 months in Federal prison, but Abramoff’s lawyers lobbied authorities to “place their client in a low-security prison with special facilities for observant Jews.” (Philip Shenon, “Abramoff Sentenced to Nearly 6 Years in Prison in Fraud Case,” New York Times, Mar. 29, 2006.) Abramoff only served 43 months of his sentence before being released on December 3, 2010. Abramoff had a certain suspicious connection to the 9/11 patsies discussed at length in this section. SunCruz Casinos was a company fraudulently acquired by Abramoff and Kidan from “Gus” Boulis, who was later gunned down Mafia-style in his car on February 6, 2001. (“More Guilty Pleas From Abramoff,” CBS News, May 3, 2010.) Several of the Arab patsies who were blamed for 9/11 reportedly boarded one of Abramoff’s SunCruz gambling boats in a still-unexplained visit on September 5th of 2001. (“SunCruz Casinos turns over documents in terrorist probe,” Associated Press, Sept. 26, 2001 / Daniel Hopsicker, “The Secret World of Jack Abramoff: Terrorists, Torpedos and Republican ‘Muscle’,” Mad Cow Morning News, June 21, 2005.) What possible thrill could gambling offer men getting ready to die in less than a week? And why would “fanatical Muslims” whose religion harshly condemns gambling as immoral be doing on a casino boat owned by a Zionist Jew? The Take Our World Back website, in its extensive report entitled “9/11 For Reality Deniers,” posited the following plausible scenario regarding this incident:
“Some of the alleged “9/11 hijackers” were reportedly seen on a SunCruz gambling boat shortly before 9/11. Any Arab patsies whom the 9/11 perpetrators needed to eliminate could have been lured into an ambush with the promise of “something special” such as a poker game where the patsies would be told they could “make a killing”.”
We have seen that most of these Arab patsies had reported that their passports had been lost or stolen in the years preceding the attack on 9/11. Stealing and forging passports to use on covert missions is a classic Mossad technique. Spy expert Gordon Thomas revealed that the Mossad “have a unit, a special team, who are trained in lifting passports.” (“Gordon Thomas, Mossad expert, on Dubaigate,” Euro News, Mar. 15, 2010.) In his book “By Way of Deception,” Victor Ostrovsky revealed that the Mossad has a factory in the illegal settlement of Petah Tikva dedicated specifically to producing fake passports for its spies and operatives. Back in 1997, Israel was forced to apologize to Canada after “two Mossad agents, using fake Canadian passports, failed in a bid to assassinate the Hamas leader Khalid Meshal in Amman, the Jordanian capital.” (Fred Lingel, “Israeli Agents Arrested in Plot To Forge Passports,” American Free Press, July 23, 2004.) In 2004, two reckless Mossad agents named Uriel Kelman and Eli Cara were convicted and jailed for six months for fraudulently attempting to obtain a New Zealand passport in the name of a tetraplegic man in order to create a false identity for another Mossad agent named Zev Barkan. (“‘Mossad spies’ jailed over New Zealand passport fraud,” The Guardian, July 16, 2004.) In 2010, a cadre of bloodthirsty Mossad assassins used dozens of false EU passports to travel to Dubai in order to kill Hamas commander Mahmoud al-Mabhouh. (“Arrest head of Mossad, Dubai police chief says,” The Telegraph, Feb. 18, 2010.) It should now be rather obvious to the reader what is really going on here.
All of these facts, occurrences and circumstances are consistent with, and highly indicative of, a typical Mossad false-flag provocation. That was the conclusion of Mohammed Atta’s own father, Muhammad Al Amir Atta, a semi-retired lawyer who lives in Cairo, Egypt. In a press conference shortly after the attacks, Atta’s father said that he spoke with his son on September 12th, the day after 9/11, and had a “normal conversation” with him. When asked about his son’s alleged involvement in the 9/11 attacks, the elder Atta frankly stated: “Mossad and Israel are who benefits the most from this… They want to try to hang this on the Arab world. When America learns that Mossad did it, they won’t be able to say anything.” (Ashraf Khalil, “Muhammad Atta Sr is in the center of the media storm,” Cairo Times, Volume 5, Issue 29, 27 Sept. – 3 Oct., 2001.) Based on all of these incredible facts and observations we can confidently surmise that Mohammed Atta, Ziad Jarrah, and by extension their seventeen alleged Arab-Muslim co-conspirators, are innocent victims of a Mossad conspiracy – a highly sophisticated frame-up operation on a scale that even Mossad had never before attempted in its long history of false-flag terrorism.
A significant part of the U.S. government’s version of events also rests on the comical “confessions” of the alleged masterminds of the atrocity – Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM) and Osama bin Laden (OBL). It has been widely acknowledged that all of the information and claims of responsibility that came from KSM were extracted through torture, and are thus completely useless and unreliable. (Richard Esposito, “How the CIA Broke the 9/11 Attacks Mastermind,” ABC News, Sept. 13, 2007 / “CIA waterboarded al-Qaida suspects 266 times,” The Guardian, April 20, 2009.) The New York Times reported that,
“C.I.A. officers used waterboarding at least 83 times in August 2002 against Abu Zubaydah, according to a 2005 Justice Department legal memorandum. Abu Zubaydah has been described as a Qaeda operative. …The 2005 memo also says that the C.I.A. used waterboarding 183 times in March 2003 against Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the self-described planner of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.” (Scott Shane, “Waterboarding Used 266 Times on 2 Suspects,” New York Times, April 19, 2009.)
KSM’s “confessions” were such an obvious farce that even former U.S. intelligence officers were openly doubting the credibility of his torture-induced claims of responsibility. (“March 15-23, 2007 and Shortly After: Media and Terrorism Analysts Respond to KSM Confession with Scepticism,” History Commons) On top of that, there is the issue of the dubious “bin Laden confession tape” which was touted by Zionist media pundits and American government officials as the ultimate proof of bin Laden’s and Al-Qaeda’s presumed guilt. (“Tape ‘proves Bin Laden’s guilt’,” BBC News, Dec. 14, 2001.) The tape was magically “discovered” in an abandoned house in Jalalabad, Afghanistan, by U.S. intelligence officials in December 2001, according to the official story. This ‘fortunate find’ doesn’t pass the smell test. The likelihood of finding such a small tape in a large city with a lot of buildings is astronomically low. Were squads of video watchers sent in to view every tape found just in case one showed Osama confessing? Top Bush administration officials have actually asserted that since bin Laden allegedly “confessed” to planning 9/11 on this tape they don’t have to prove his involvement in the attacks with tangible evidence. How convenient! U.S. Senator Ron Wyden, a Jew, revealed a distinct Zionist motivation behind the release of the video, stating that he’d hoped it would “remove suspicions in countries such as Pakistan that the 11 September attacks were an Israeli plot aimed at drawing the US into a war with Islamic countries.” (Ibid.) And that was the purpose the video ultimately served.
The ‘confession tape’ is of very poor audio and visual quality, and the words being spoken by those seen on screen are barely audible. The authenticity of the tape has been seriously questioned by video experts. (“The Fake 2001 bin Laden Video Tape,” What Really Happened) In fact, a German television program investigated the matter and determined that the translation of the tape provided by the Pentagon was false. The show consulted two independent translators and an expert on oriental studies who analyzed the tape and found that the White House’s translation was not merely inaccurate but manipulative. (Craig Morris, “Mistranslated Osama bin Laden Video – the German Press Investigates,” Dec. 30, 2001.) One of the translators, Arabist Dr. Abdel El M. Husseini, stated: “I have carefully examined the Pentagon’s translation. This translation is very problematic. At the most important places where it is held to prove the guilt of Bin Laden, it is not identical with the Arabic.” (Ibid.) Gernot Rotter, a professor of Islamic and Arabic Studies at the Asia-Africa Institute at the University of Hamburg, explained: “The American translators who listened to the tapes and transcribed them apparently wrote a lot of things in that they wanted to hear but that cannot be heard on the tape no matter how many times you listen to it.” (Ibid.) I previously quoted from an interview conducted by the Pakistani daily Ummat with OBL that was published in Karachi a few weeks after the attacks in which he vehemently denies being behind 9/11, stating that people should investigate Israel and Zionism to trace the authorship of this crime as they were the only beneficiaries of such an event. Why would he initially deny involvement only to go on to take credit for it a few months later? If bin Laden was truly responsible for 9/11 he would have immediately and proudly acknowledged that fact.
Since 9/11 we have been inundated with a barrage of poor quality video and audio tapes purporting to be messages from Osama bin Laden, none of which have been authenticated or proven legitimate in the slightest degree. All of these were released at the most opportune times for the Bush administration. For example, in 2004, during Bush’s campaign for re-election, another OBL video surfaced at a time when Bush seemed to be falling in the polls. (“The Fake 2004 Bin Laden Video Tape,” What Really Happened) After the video was continuously aired and re-aired on all the mass media outlets, Bush’s approval rating quickly rose above that of his opponent John Kerry, leading to his re-election. Unsurprisingly, the video was proven to be a digitally created fake — a political ploy to help Bush win the election. (“Osama bin Laden: A Weapon of Mass Convenience,” What Really Happened)
It shouldn’t come as much of a surprise to learn that two former CIA officials have admitted to creating a fake video in which “darker-skinned” intelligence officers dressed up as Osama bin Laden and his associates in an effort to defame and discredit the Islamic leader throughout the Middle East. A former Army Intelligence case officer named Jeff Stein outlined the details in a Washington Post article. Stein revealed that during the planning of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the CIA’s Iraq Operations Group tossed around the idea of creating a fake video depicting Saddam Hussein having sex with a young teenage boy, and flooding copies of the tape throughout Iraqi cities to discredit and embarrass the Iraqi leader amongst his people. This dirty project never came to fruition, but Stein’s sources told him that the agency did previously concoct at least one fake bin Laden video:
“The agency actually did make a video purporting to show Osama bin Laden and his cronies sitting around a campfire swigging bottles of liquor and savoring their conquests with boys, one of the former CIA officers recalled, chuckling at the memory. The actors were drawn from “some of us darker-skinned employees,” he said.” (Jeff Stein, “CIA unit’s wacky idea: Depict Saddam as gay,” The Washington Post, May 25, 2010.)
Another reason to dismiss the legitimacy of these bin Laden tapes is that a preponderance of evidence indicates that OBL died in December of 2001. Sources in Pakistan and Afghanistan have confirmed this. In 2002, Pakistan’s President Pervez Musharraf and the Afghan President Hamid Karzai both stated that Bin Laden was “probably dead.” (“Karzai: bin Laden ‘probably’ dead,” CNN, Oct. 7, 2002 / “Pakistan’s Musharraf: Bin Laden probably dead,” CNN, Jan. 18, 2002.) A Taliban leader announced that OBL had “died a peaceful death due to an untreated lung complication” in December of 2001 in the vicinity of the Tora Bora Mountains and that thirty of OBL’s close followers and associates laid him to rest in a traditional Wahabi Muslim funeral. (“Report: Bin Laden Already Dead,” Fox News, Dec. 26, 2001.) An Egyptian newspaper carried a report on the funeral which was held in mid-December of 2001. (“News of Bin Laden’s Death and Funeral 10 days ago,” al-Wafd, Vol 15, No 4633, Dec. 26, 2001.)
Prior to 9/11, OBL had often been reported to be in poor health. It was reported that two months before September 11, OBL flew to Dubai for 10 days for treatment at the American hospital where he was visited by the local CIA agent. (“CIA agent alleged to have met Bin Laden in July,” The Guardian, Nov. 1, 2001.) In 2000, Le Figaro reported that OBL ordered a mobile dialysis machine to be delivered to his base at Kandahar in Afghanistan in order to treat his failing kidneys. (Ibid.) CNN’s medical correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, confirmed that OBL was most likely suffering from chronic kidney failure which requires dialysis treatment. Dialysis machines require electricity, clean water, and a sterile setting — without those things it is not likely that a person with this condition could survive for more than a few days. (“Dr. Sanjay Gupta: Bin Laden would need help if on dialysis,” CNN, Jan. 21, 2002.) That begs the question: how could OBL have survived all of these years in a desolate, isolated mountain hide-out with such chronic health issues that required constant medical attention and treatment? It is an impossibility!
The reality of OBL’s poor health and his eventual death in December of 2001 didn’t stop the despotic Bush administration and the Jewish-owned media from perpetuating the lie that OBL was still alive and still a ‘threat’ to America. The claim that the U.S. military and CIA were hunting down OBL and his group in Afghanistan is a giant sham that served as a convenient excuse to continue the military occupation of that country. Think about this: for over a decade the greatest military power in the history of the world, with all of its spy agencies, spy satellites, high-tech gadgets and listening devices, predator drones, F-15 and F-16 fighter jets, stealth aircraft and Apache helicopters, could not track down or kill one man!? This outlandish fable is simply not believable. The so-called “hunt for bin Laden” is a monstrous ruse to justify the “war on terror” hoax, which is in actuality a war of extermination targeting Israel’s enemies in the Middle East. The fact is that bin Laden died in December of 2001 — all intelligence agencies know this, but the popular image of OBL as an eternal ‘terrorist threat’ to America provides the Jewish-Zionist string-pullers controlling the U.S. Military Industrial Complex with a replenishing source of fear and paranoia to keep the ignorant masses of the West in line with their genocidal agenda for global supremacy.
OBL served as the ultimate patsy and fall-guy for the Jewish-Zionist conspirators behind 9/11. This point was expressed, although not directly, by veteran CIA agent Milt Bearden. On a CBS broadcast with Dan Rather the day after 9/11, Bearden stated: “This was a tremendously sophisticated operation against the United States—more sophisticated than anybody would have ascribed to Osama bin Laden.” (“CIA Talks About Bin Laden Being Trained By CIA on CNN,” YouTube) With regard to the widespread view that bin Laden was behind the attacks, he skeptically opined:
“I think Osama bin Laden has become the metaphor for the entire problem of terrorism involving Muslims with perceived grievances against the United States. I think it would be wrong to say this is a one-size-fits-all operation and to go after Bin Laden because an operation as sophisticated as [the one] carried out yesterday was an operation that was concealed from us for months… It happened without essentially a hitch except for one aircraft. And there is no reason to believe that these same people weren’t capable of covering their tracks somehow on the way out. Now I would go so far as to say that this group who was responsible for that, if they didn’t have an Osama bin Laden out there they’d invent one because he’s a terrific diversion for the rest of the world.” (Ibid.)
In interviews he has given to the press, OBL has often alluded to the dangerous reality of Jewish domination of the United States. He has said that the American imperial policy of occupation and destruction of Muslim countries is ferociously led by the Zionist Jews who control America through their malignant monopoly over the banking, media and political sectors of American society. Back in 1998, bin Laden issued a dire warning to the American people, suggesting that the death-grip of Organized Jewry on America is driving the country, and the world, towards hell on earth. Addressing the Jewish question, bin Laden said:
“The enmity between us and the Jews goes far back in time and is deep rooted. There is no question that war between the two of us is inevitable. The leaders in America and in other countries as well have fallen victim to Jewish Zionist blackmail. …
They have mobilized their people against Islam and against Muslims. Our mothers and daughters and sons are slaughtered every day with the approval of America and its support… And, while America blocks the entry of weapons into Islamic countries, it provides the Israelis with a continuous supply of arms allowing them thus to kill and massacre more Muslims.
The American government is leading the country toward hell. We say to the Americans as people and to American mothers, if they cherish their lives and if they cherish their sons, they must elect an American patriotic government that caters to their interests, not the interests of the Jews.” (Chris Bollyn, “What Does Bin Laden Really Want?,” American Free Press, Oct. 11, 2001.)
In 2011, the illegitimate U.S. president Barrack Obama attempted to perpetuate the myth of Osama bin Laden by staging a fake ‘assassination’ of an already dead OBL. The New York Times reported that “Osama bin Laden… was killed in a firefight with United States forces in Pakistan, President Obama announced on Sunday.” (“Bin Laden Is Dead, Obama Says,” New York Times, May 1, 2011.) OBL was supposedly camped “in a massive compound about an hour’s drive north from the Pakistani capital of Islamabad. He was hiding in the medium-sized city of Abbottabad, home to a large Pakistani military base and a military academy of the Pakistani Army.” (Ibid.) The suggestion that OBL could have been hiding out in this compound, which was located near a Pakistani military base, for years without anybody knowing about it is simply childish nonsense. An eyewitness to the event, who had lived on the same street as the compound where OBL was allegedly hiding, told Al Jazeera reporter Imtiaz Tyab flat out that the story was not true and that bin Laden had never been hiding in that house. The eyewitness said that he had walked by that house every night and even rented the house next door to his cousin, stating that he had not once seen Osama bin Laden or heard anything that would indicate OBL was residing in that house for an extended period of time. (“A witness account of Bin Laden’s death,” Al Jazeera English, May 2, 2011.)
Even more telling is the fact that OBL’s mythical ‘corpse’ was hastily “buried at sea” by the U.S. military before any impartial observers could identify the body — evidently because it was not the body of OBL if there even was a body at all. The U.S. government falsely claimed that this type of burial “complies with Islamic custom,” when in reality burial at sea is extremely uncommon for Muslims. (“Bin Laden’s body buried at sea,” The Guardian, May 2, 2011.) This means that the dramatic story of OBL’s alleged killing is based solely on the less-than-credible word of the U.S. government! In addition to these discrepancies, the official narrative of OBL’s assassination by U.S. forces was changed and altered by the Obama regime numerous times. They couldn’t even get their story straight — a tell-tale sign of fraud, cover-up and conspiracy. (“The killing of Osama bin Laden: how the White House changed its story,” The Guardian, May 4, 2011.) Brazen evidence of a hoax came right on the heels of the news of OBL’s alleged killing, when some mass media outlets quickly published a gruesome picture of a bloodied and presumably ‘dead’ OBL. The photograph was immediately exposed as a sloppy fake. The Guardian reported:
“An image apparently showing a dead Osama bin Laden broadcast on Pakistani television and picked up by British newspaper websites is a fake. The bloodied image of a man with matted hair and a blank, half-opened eye has been circulating on the internet for the past two years. It was used on the front pages of the Mail, Times, Telegraph, Sun and Mirror websites, though swiftly removed after the fake was exposed on Twitter.” (“Osama bin Laden corpse photo is fake,” The Guardian, May 2, 2011.)
To sum up, Osama bin Laden and ‘Al-Qaeda’ did not commit 9/11 and were not capable of doing so even if they wanted to. The popular image of bin Laden as the “arch-villain” and nemesis of the U.S. serves the same purpose for the American government that the “Emmanuel Goldstein” character did for the tyrannical regime depicted in George Orwell’s classic novel ‘1984’ — an artificial enemy manufactured by the state to rule the population with fear. OBL and ‘Al-Qaeda’ are not an actual threat, but merely a weapon of propaganda for the U.S. government and the Jewish agenda that drives it. The myth of Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda has been used to hoodwink the American public into supporting the imperial schemes of Zionism.
© 2013 Zander C. Fuerza
Download the complete book HERE
Masters of Deception by Zander C. Fuerza 